Distribution of HLA-DRB1 genes in patients with sporadic ankylosing spondylitis in the south of Spain.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between the presence of different HLA-DRB1 genes and predisposition to develop a sporadic form of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in a demographically well-defined population. METHODS: One hundred fifteen selected patients with sporadic (non-familial) forms of AS from six different cities and 748 bone marrow donors as control group. All individuals were typed for HLA-B27 by flow cytometry with monoclonal antibodies and PCR -SSP, as well as for HLA-DRB using the Dynal ELI SSO HLA-DRB Test (Dynal AS, Oslo, Norway). The Inno-Lipa DRB Decoder (Innogenetics NV Zwijndrecht, Belgium), was used for high-resolution HLA-DRB typing. RESULTS: The presence of the DRB1*01 antigen in the studied population is significantiy higher in B27 positive healthy individuals (bone marrow donors) than in B27 positive AS patients; also, DRB1*01 is higher in B27 negative AS patients than 827 negative controls. The frequency of DRB1*03 is higher in B27 negative controls than B27 negative AS patients. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that DRB1*01 antigens might be involved in the development of sporadic forms of ankylosing spondylitis in HLA-B27 negative individuals in the studied area.

Can some cases of 'possible' spondyloarthropathy be classified as 'definite' or 'undifferentiated' spondyloarthropathy? Value of criteria for spondyloarthropathies. Spanish Spondyloarthropathy Study Group.

OBJECTIVES: When evaluating patients for spondyloarthropathy, clinicians use the 'possible spondyloarthropathy' category to indicate that they are unsure about the diagnosis. We sought to determine whether Amor's criteria or the European Spondyloarthropathy Study Group (ESSG) criteria could lift thi uncertainty. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During a Spanish study designed to validate criteria for spondyloar thropathies, 102 patients were classified in the 'possible spondyloarthropathy' category. We divided these patients into subgroups based on whether or not they met criteria for spondyloarthropathy. We compare baseline characteristics (N = 102) and five-year outcomes (N = 52) in these subgroups. RESULTS: The following features were significantly more common in the subgroups of patients who met Amor's criteria for spondyloarthropathy: oligoarthritis, heel pain, uveitis, balanitis, family history of spondyloarthropathy, an presence of the HLA B27 antigen. No differences were found for age at symptom onset, disease duration, buttock pain, gender, dactylitis, diarrhea, or psoriasis. Of the 52 patients followed up for five years, 17 me Amor's criteria at baseline and 13 were subsequently found to have definite spondyloarthropathy, whic was undifferentiated in six cases. There were only three cases of spondyloarthropathy among the 2 patients who did not meet Amor's criteria at baseline. Of the 28 patients who met ESSG criteria at baseline, 13 had spondyloarthropathy versus three of the 17 patients who did not meet ESSG criteria at baseline CONCLUSION: Amor's criteria or the ESSG criteria allow early classification of most patients with 'possible spondyloarthropathy' and early identification of undifferentiated spondyloarthropathy corresponding to minimal-symptom or incipient disease. In this study, Amor's criteria performed better than the ESSG criteria.