Humoral and cellular responses after a third dose of SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 vaccine in patients with lymphoid malignancies.

Patients with hematological malignancies have impaired immune response after two doses of BNT162b2 (Pfizer/BioNTech) vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. Here, in this observational study (registration number HDH F20210324145532), we measure SARS-CoV-2 anti-Spike antibodies, neutralizing antibodies and T-cell responses after immune stimulation with a third dose (D3) of the same vaccine in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (n = 13), B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 14), and multiple myeloma (n = 16)). No unexpected novel side effects are reported. Among 25 patients with positive anti-S titers before D3, 23 (92%) patients increase their anti-S and neutralizing antibody titer after D3. All 18 (42%) initially seronegative patients remain negative. D3 increases the median IFN-γ secretion in the whole cohort and induces IFN-γ secretion in a fraction of seronegative patients. Our data thus support the use of a third vaccine dose amongst patients with lymphoid malignancies, even though some of them will still have vaccine failure.

Azacitidine-Induced Interstitial Pneumonitis.

Azacitidine is a demethylating and cytotoxic drug for the treatment of adult patients with (1) myelodysplastic syndromes, (2) chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, and (3) acute myeloid leukemia who are not eligible for induction treatment or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Widely described in the literature, the main adverse events are hematotoxicity, digestive toxicity, asthenia, cutaneous toxicity, and infections such as neutropenic sepsis and pneumonia. The pivotal phase III comparative and supporting studies did not point out interstitial pneumonitis as a significant adverse event. Rare clinical data from literature report interstitial lung disease secondary to azacitidine administration, which should therefore be considered as a serious potential adverse event. We, herein, report a case of an 86-year-old white woman with acute myeloid leukemia and azacitidine-induced interstitial pneumonitis.

Sustained response with gemcitabine plus Nab-paclitaxel after folfirinox failure in metastatic pancreatic cancer: report of an effective new strategy.

INTRODUCTION: Folfirinox has shown a benefit in terms of survival and quality of life in first line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer. However, efficacy of second line chemotherapy after folfirinox is still limited. Gemcitabine plus Nab-paclitaxel have been recently validated as first line treatment with an increased overall survival compared to gemcitabine. This combination has never been studied as second-line after folfirinox. CASE REPORT: A metastatic pancreatic cancer was diagnosed in a 60-year-old patient with a performance status of 0. After 10 cycles of folfirinox, and an initial objective response, we objectively noted progressive disease according to the RECIST 1.1 criteria together with an increased carbohydrate antigen 19-9. The multidisciplinary team decided to use gemcitabine plus Nab-paclitaxel as second line palliative chemotherapy. After 2 months, we obtained an objective response. After 6 months, this response was maintained with an acceptable tolerability. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine plus Nab-paclitaxel, as second line palliative chemotherapy, after failure of folfirinox, could be a good strategy for patients with a performance status of 0 and 1. Obviously, this data has to be confirmed in larger patients series and in future comparative clinical studies.