RESUMO
Purpose: To compare the surgical and clinical outcomes of 27-gauge vitrectomy and 23-gauge vitrectomy. Methods: We conducted a single-center, prospective, randomized study. Fifty-three patients affected by vitreoretinal interface disorders (epiretinal membranes and macular holes) were randomly scheduled to undergo 27-gauge (28 patients) or 23-gauge (25 patients) pars plana vitrectomy. The presence of any potential factor of increased baseline inflammation or eye anatomy influencing the surgery was criteria for exclusion. The time of surgery, postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP), state of sclerotomy wounds, rate of complications, postoperative pain, and indicators of inflammation were studied. We also introduced a new parameter to compare intraocular inflammation after surgery, given by the change in the number of intraretinal hyperreflective foci (HRF). Results: The 27-gauge vitrectomy was 1.28 min longer than 23-gauge vitrectomy (P < 0.05). The day after surgery, the mean IOP value was significantly higher in the 27-gauge group (16.12 mmHg versus 13.04 mmHg in the 23-gauge group,P < 0.05), but this difference disappeared in successive follow-ups and the sclerotomy wounds closed after 2 weeks in the both groups. The rate of postoperative hypotony did not significantly differ in the two groups (10.71% in the 27-gauge group and 8% in the 23-gauge group the day after the surgery,P = 0.94). Less postoperative eye redness was seen in 27-gauge eyes (value 1 on the scale) compared to 23-gauge (value 2 on the scale) (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in intraocular inflammation (cells, Tyndall, and number of HRF,P > 0.05 for all). Conclusions: The 27-gauge vitrectomy may have better outcomes in terms of IOP maintenance and cause less redness after the surgery but with a slightly prolonged surgery time and no other differences under other parameters (inflammation, rate of complications, postoperative pain, visual gain, and closure of the sclerotomy wounds).
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To compare the clinical findings and outcomes of vitrectomy for lamellar macular holes (LMH) versus epiretinal membrane foveoschisis (ERMF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 36 eyes of 35 patients with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) parameters and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were analyzed preoperatively and postoperatively. RESULTS: The 19 (52.8%) ERMF and 17 (47.2%) LMH were included. Preoperatively, eyes with LMH were characterized by a lower central foveal thickness (CFT) (102.18 ± 31.44 µm vs 159.37 ± 25.25 µm, p < 0.001) and a greater incidence of outer retinal disruption (p < 0.001). Primary anatomical success was achieved in 34/36 eyes (94.4%). Preoperative BCVA was better in ERMF (0.16 - IQR 0.09 - logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (LogMAR) - 20/28 Snellen) than LMH (0.40 - IQR 0.30 - LogMAR, 20/50 Snellen) (p = 0.008). At 6 months after surgery, BCVA significantly improved in the ERMF group (p < 0.001), but showed insignificant change in LMH (p = 0.125). Two cases, both in the LMH group, developed full thickness macular hole after surgery. CONCLUSION: Eyes with LMH showed visual stabilization after surgery, whereas the eyes in the ERMF group were susceptible to functional improvement. These differences in BCVA outcomes may be the consequence of a higher damage in the outer retina in the LMH group; an accurate SD-OCT examination is a fundamental step when deciding to proceed or not to the surgery.
