Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Imaging ; 85: 106-114, 2022 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35278869

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To determine the incidence and clinical predictors of intrathoracic complications in COVID-19 patients, and the association with outcomes. METHODS: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, we included 976 patients (age 61 ± 17 years, 62% male) who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 between March 3-April 4, 2020 and underwent chest imaging. 3836 radiographs from 976 patients and 105 CTs from 88 patients were reviewed for intrathoracic complications, including pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, pneumopericardium, lobar collapse, pleural effusion, and pneumatocele formation. RESULTS: There was a high rate of intrathoracic complications (197/976, 20%). Pleural effusion was the most common complication (168/976, 17%). Pneumothorax (30/976, 3%) and pneumatoceles (9/88, 10%) were also frequent. History of hypertension and high initial CXR severity score were independent risk factors for complications. Patients with any intrathoracic complication during admission had an over 11-fold risk of ICU admission (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 11.2, p < 0.0001) and intubation (aOR 12.4, p < 0.0001), over 50% reduction in successful extubation (aOR 0.49, p = 0.02) and longer length of stay (median 13 versus 5 days, p < 0.0001). There was no difference in overall survival between patients with and without any complication (log-rank p = 0.94). CONCLUSION: In COVID-19 patients who underwent chest imaging, 1 in 5 patients have an intrathoracic complication, which are associated with higher level of care and prolonged hospital stay. Hypertension history and high CXR severity score confer an increased risk of complication. SUMMARY: Intrathoracic complications in COVID-19 are common and are predictive of ICU admission, need for intubation, less successful extubation, and longer length of stay but are not predictive of mortality.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório , Adulto , Idoso , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol ; 51(4): 524-528, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34974882

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether thoracic radiologist review of computed tomography-detected incidental pulmonary nodules initially reported by non-thoracic imagers would change management recommendations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Radiology Consultation Service identified 468 computed tomography scans (one per patient) performed through the adult emergency department from August 2018 through December 2020 that mentioned the presence of a pulmonary nodule. Forty percent (186/468) were read by thoracic radiologists and 60% (282/468) were read by non-thoracic radiologists. The Radiology Consultation Service contacted all patients in order to assess risk factors for lung malignancy. Sixty-seven patients were excluded because they were unreachable, declined participation, or were actively followed by a pulmonologist or oncologist. A thoracic radiologist assessed the nodule and follow up recommendations in all remaining cases. RESULTS: A total of 215 cases were re-reviewed by thoracic radiologists. The thoracic radiologist disagreed with the initial nodule recommendations in 38% (82/215) of cases and agreed in 62% (133/215) of cases. All discordant cases resulted in a change in management by the thoracic radiologist with approximately one-third (33%, 27/82) decreasing imaging utilization and two-thirds (67%, 55/82) increasing imaging utilization. Nodules were deemed benign and follow up eliminated in 11% (9/82) of discordant cases. DISCUSSION: Our study illustrates that nodule review by thoracic radiologists results in a change in management in a large percentage of patients. Continued research is needed to determine whether subspecialty imaging review results in increased or more timely lung cancer detection.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Nódulos Pulmonares Múltiplos , Nódulo Pulmonar Solitário , Adulto , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Nódulos Pulmonares Múltiplos/diagnóstico por imagem , Nódulos Pulmonares Múltiplos/terapia , Assistência ao Paciente , Nódulo Pulmonar Solitário/diagnóstico por imagem , Nódulo Pulmonar Solitário/terapia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos
3.
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol ; 50(3): 401-409, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32703539

RESUMO

The last 10 years has seen a steady rise in the use of electronic cigarettes ("e-cigarettes" or ECIGs) or "vape pens." Though initially developed to assist with smoking cessation, use among adolescents has been particularly high. A concomitant rise in ECIG-related injuries disproportionately affecting young patients has been recognized. This unique case series highlights both pulmonary and extra-pulmonary ECIG-induced injuries including vape tip ingestion, maxillofacial fractures after vape pen explosion, myocarditis, and several different manifestations of vaping-associated lung injury. Becoming familiar with expected imaging findings in the wide array of ECIG-induced complications will help radiologists recognize these findings, recommend further imaging as needed, facilitate early diagnosis by help referring clinicians elicit the relevant history from patients, and expedite appropriate treatment.


Assuntos
Sistemas Eletrônicos de Liberação de Nicotina , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Vaping , Adolescente , Humanos , Vaping/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...