Continuing education in medicine: a useful tool for nurses' empowerment in renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Continuing Education in Medicine (CEM) underlines the importance of updates and information for the health care team. Our aim was to describe the organization and results of a CEM course "educate to organ donation" that involved the nursing team in an educational experience with high school students. The course consists of theory (4 hours; the physician-patient relationship, the educational role of the nurse, the teaching policy, checklist, and results of a school education program) and practice (10 hours; the attendants join the teaching team in the classrooms and in the plenary session). Analysis of anonymous questionnaires performed after the course contained semistructured questions and analog scales. RESULTS: The first acknowledgment came from the Cabinet of Public Health, which gave the maximum number of credits (14 for 14 education hours). PARTICIPATION: presently 40 nurses, about 40% of those working in the renal unit (over 30 CEM courses are available in the hospital). Satisfaction: Overall score was median 8.5 (6 to 10) including teaching materials = 8 (4 to 10). Among the theoretical part, the lesson on patient-physician relationship obtained the highest score. The main drawback was the shortness of the practical part. The classroom meeting achieved a median score of 9.5 (7 to 10), the general session = 9 (5 to 10). All but one nurse registered for an "advanced" course, giving more time to the practical part (20 hours). CONCLUSION: CEM may represent an important way to deliver education on transplant-related issues to patients and to the general population.

Pregnancy after kidney transplantation: an evidence-based approach.

Despite the relatively little space for transplantation in most medical schools, this issue is considered interesting by the students both for its clinical and ethical implications. The students were asked to choose a particular aspect of nephrology for a 2-hour case discussion. They chose the case of a 35-year-old female, kidney transplant recipient now 1.5 years postoperatively, who was coming to seek advice about pregnancy. The aim of the present work is to report an integration between narrative and evidence-based medicine (EBM) approaches. The search strategy was developed within a multidisciplinary working group, two of whose members were also masters in the methodology of systematic revisions. The first step in the discussion was the identification of ethical and methodological problem. In a rapidly developing field, books are unlikely to be able to give updated information. One needs to interact with electronic databases. In this context, no randomized controlled trial on pregnancy is expected. The evidence is likely to be heterogeneous. Prenatal care delivery differs around the world in part related to attitudes toward pregnancy, which depend upon religion and traditions. The second step was the definition of the search strategy. The third step, was selecting and cataloging the evidence. The titles and abstracts retrieved by the search strategy (272 items) were examined to identify full papers to be retrieved. The evidence retrieved was screened for the type of paper (reviews, primary studies, case reports, case series) and for the authors to give an indirect idea of duplicate publication bias. Teaching a complex and ever-changing subject, such as kidney transplantation, is a difficult task. The case of a young woman seeking information on the probability to undergo a successful pregnancy was particularly likely to exemplify the importance of being aware of the biases of the book-based information and on the need to interact with the internet. The search strategy developed by the working group of postgraduate trainees allowed students to have a direct experience with the complexity of the field. This preliminary study, as the basis for development of a checklist informed consent form on pregnancy in kidney transplantation, may give a first rough quantification of the work needed by a physician who wants to have a direct idea of the odds and risks of pregnancy in kidney transplant patients.