Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 28(8): 1549-1553, 2018 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29700613

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: In case of clinical suspicion of triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) injury, different imaging techniques are used. The aim of this study was to determine whether MRA is superior to MRI and whether 3.0 T is better than 1.5 T (expresses in sensitivity, specificity and accuracy) in detecting TFCC injury, using arthroscopy as the gold standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The arthroscopic and MR findings of 150 patients who underwent arthroscopy for ulnar-sided wrist pain between January 2009 and November 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: MRA was slightly more accurate compared to conventional MRI, and 1.5 T was slightly more accurate than 3.0 T. 1.5 T wrist MRA had a sensitivity of 80%, a specificity of 100% and accuracy of 90%; 3.0 T wrist MRA 73, 100 and 86%, resp. Conventional 1.5 T wrist MRI had a sensitivity of 71%, a specificity of 75% and accuracy of 73%. For 3.0 T conventional MRI, this was 73, 67 and 70%, resp. CONCLUSIONS: MRA seems slightly superior to conventional MRI, but one could question whether this difference in diagnostic accuracy outweighs the burden and risks of an invasive procedure for patients with its additional costs. Furthermore, we could not confirm the superiority of 3 T compared to 1.5 T.


Assuntos
Artralgia/diagnóstico , Angiografia por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Fibrocartilagem Triangular , Articulação do Punho , Adulto , Artralgia/cirurgia , Artroscopia/métodos , Precisão da Medição Dimensional , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Fibrocartilagem Triangular/diagnóstico por imagem , Fibrocartilagem Triangular/lesões , Fibrocartilagem Triangular/cirurgia , Articulação do Punho/diagnóstico por imagem , Articulação do Punho/patologia , Articulação do Punho/cirurgia
2.
Clin Diagn Lab Immunol ; 8(1): 166-9, 2001 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11139212

RESUMO

An assay device for the rapid detection of Leptospira-specific immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies in human sera is presented. The sensitivity (85.8%) and specificity (93.6%) of the assay compared well (91.9% agreement) with those of an IgM enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay routinely used in the serodiagnosis of leptospirosis. The sensitivity of the assay varied with the stage of the disease. The assay uses stabilized components and is simply performed by the addition of serum and sample fluid to the sample well of the assay device. The assay is read after 10 min, and a positive result is obtained when staining of the test line is observed.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antibacterianos/sangue , Leptospira/imunologia , Leptospirose/diagnóstico , Humanos , Testes Sorológicos/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA