Oncologic long-term outcome of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has been introduced as a less invasive alternative to multi-port laparoscopic surgery (MLS). MLS is widely accepted for the treatment of colorectal cancer, but there remains minimal evidence for the use of SILS. Thus, we compared both short- and long-term outcomes of SILS and open surgery (OS) in matched cohorts of colorectal cancer patients. METHODS: Some 910 patients had colorectal resections for cancer between 2006 and 2013, and 134 of them were operated on using SILS. Eighty of these SILS patients were compared to a cohort of patients who had open surgery that were matching in tumour stage and location, type of resection, sex, age and ASA Score. Disease-free survival at 5 years (5y-DFS) was the primary endpoint; morbidity and hospitalization were secondary parameters. The role of surgical training in SILS was also investigated. RESULTS: Clavien Dindo ≥ IIIb complications occurred in 13.8% in both groups. 5y-DSF were 82% after SILS and 70% after OS (p = 0.11). Local recurrence after rectal cancer tended to be lower after SILS (0/43 (SILS) vs. 4/35 (OS), p = 0.117). Length of stay was significantly shorter after SILS (10 vs. 14 days, p = 0.0004). The rate of operations performed by surgical residents was equivalent in both groups (44/80 (SILS) vs. 46/80 (OS), p = 0.75). CONCLUSION: The data demonstrates that SILS results in similar long-term oncological outcomes when compared to open surgery as well as morbidity rates. The hospital stay in the SILS group was shorter. SILS can also be incorporated in surgical training programmes.

Single-Incision Laparoscopic versus Open Sigmoidectomy for Diverticular Disease: A Disease-Stratified Matched-Pair Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is a variant of laparoscopic surgery, especially for diverticular disease (DD), but there are very little data comparing SILS to standard surgical procedures for DD, and most studies on DD surgery do not declare the disease stage. We compared SILS to open sigmoidectomy for DD in a stage-stratified matched-pair analysis to validate the significance of SILS. METHODS: All patients with SILS or conventional sigmoidectomy for diverticulitis of a single visceral surgery department were subject to a matched-pair analysis stratified by age, sex, body mass index, previous abdominal surgery, and the stage of DD. RESULTS: Fifty-five pairs were included. In total, 84/110 (76%) had complicated stages of DD. ASA stages were higher in the laparotomy group; the proportion of elective operations was similar (SILS 78%, open: 71%). In the SILS group, length of hospital stay (LoS; 10.2 vs. 16.7 days) and duration of intensive or intermediate care (IMC; 1.8 vs. 3.7 days) were shorter, blood transfusions were reduced (0.1 vs. 0.4 units) and less patients received opioids postoperatively (75 vs. 98%). The day of first defecation, stoma rate, and rates of morbidity and mortality were similar. CONCLUSIONS: SILS equals open sigmoidectomy regarding complications with advantages regarding pain, LoS, IMC/intensive care unit treatment, and blood transfusion.

[Smoldering diverticultis - still a type of chronic recurrent diverticulitis with good indication for surgery? - Surgery for smoldering diverticulitis]. / Smoldering-Divertikulitis ­ doch eine Form der chronisch-rezidivierenden Divertikulitis mit guter Operationsindikation?

BACKGROUND: Elective surgery for recurrent uncomplicated diverticulitis is a matter of debate. "Smoldering diverticulitis" (SmD) describes a subtype of the disease which is characterized by frequently relapsing symptoms triggered by a "smoldering fire-like" ongoing inflammatory process. The aim of this study was to investigate the value of surgery in these patients. METHODS: Forty-four patients with the clinical signs of SmD were selected from a prospective database of 393 patients with elective surgery for diverticulitis. They were compared for morbidity and the effect of surgery on quality of life (QL) (Gastrointestinal QL-Index (GLQI)) with a group of 95 patients who had elective surgery for perforated diverticulitis. RESULTS: Morbidity was equivalent in both groups with shorter durations of surgery in the SmD group (159 (65-301) vs. 174 (100-443) minutes, p = 0.031). Six months after surgery, a significant improvement of QL was found in the SmD group (GLQI 115 (72-143) vs. 98 (56-139) preoperatively, p = 0.018). In the control groups, only a non-significant improvement of the preoperatively less suppressed quality of life was noted. Approximately 80 % of the patients were satisfied with the outcome of surgery. CONCLUSION: In patients with SmD like chronic recurrent disease surgery is effective to improve quality of life.

Single-port laparoscopic resection for diverticular disease: experiences with more than 300 consecutive patients.

BACKGROUND: Single-port laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is a new minimally invasive technique, which has been developed to minimize the surgical access trauma. For colorectal resection, the access trauma can be limited to the one incision, which is needed for specimen extraction anyways, but dissection might be more demanding than in multiport laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of SILS for the treatment of diverticular disease of the sigmoid colon. METHODS: Between July 2009 and December 2013, a total of 329 consecutive patients with intended SILS sigmoid colectomy for complicated or frequently recurring diverticulitis were studied. Clinical data were collected in a prospective database. Telephone follow-ups were performed to evaluate long-term morbidity and quality of life. RESULTS: Of the 329 patients (139 male) with intended SILS sigmoid colectomy, 309 were successfully operated on in SILS technique, while 20 (6.1%) were converted to open surgery. The mean duration of surgery was 153.5 (65-434) min. Total morbidity rate was 18.3%. Anastomotic leakage was the most serious complication occurring in 13 patients (leak rate 4%) with one consecutive death (mortality rate 0.3%). Quality of life had significantly improved 6 months after surgery in comparison with the preoperative value. At a mean follow-up of 18.6 months, 16 patients (4.9%) had incisional hernia and one patient had recurrent diverticulitis. CONCLUSION: In spite of almost 5% incisional hernia 6 months after surgery, single-incision sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis is feasible and save and is therefore an alternative to multiport laparoscopic surgery. Further trials are necessary to evaluate its benefits over multiport laparoscopic surgery.

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for diverticulitis in overweight patients.

AIM: Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has been introduced as a new technique for the treatment of various colorectal diseases. Recurrent or complicated diverticulitis of the sigmoid colon is a frequent indication for minimally invasive sigmoid colectomy. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of obesity on the outcome of SILS sigmoid colectomy. METHODS: From September 2009 to October 2014, data from 377 patients who had intended SILS sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis at our institution were collected in a prospective database. The patients were categorized in the following subgroups: group 1 (normal weight, body mass index (BMI) < 25 kg/m(2)), group 2 (overweight, BMI 25-29.9 kg/m(2)), group 3 (obesity, BMI 30-34.9 kg/m(2)), and group 4 (morbid obesity, BMI > 35 kg/m(2)). RESULTS: The groups were equivalent for sex, age, status of diverticulitis, the presence of acute inflammation in the specimen, and the percentage of teaching operations, but the percentage of patients with accompanying diseases was significantly more frequent in groups 2, 3, and 4 (p = 0.04, 0.008, and 0.018, respectively). As compared to group 1, the conversion rate was significantly increased in groups 2 and 4 (2.3 vs. 9.3% (p = 0.013) and 2.3 vs. 12.5% (p = 0.017), respectively). The duration of surgery, hospitalization, and morbidity did not differ between the four groups. CONCLUSION: Up to a body mass index of 35 kg/m(2), increased body weight does not significantly reduce the feasibility and outcome of single-incision laparoscopic surgery for diverticulitis.

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for colorectal malignancy--results of a matched-pair comparison to conventional surgery.

BACKGROUND: Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is a new minimally invasive technique which has frequently been applied for treatment of benign colorectal diseases. However, there is still little experience with this technique for the treatment of colorectal cancer. METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with SILS resections for colon (n = 25) or rectal cancer (n = 43) were compared to a group of conventionally operated patients who were matched for surgical procedure, tumor stage and tumor location, and the use of preoperative radiochemotherapy. RESULTS: Both groups were comparable for lymph node harvest, specimen length, and the duration of surgery. No significant differences were observed for the number of positive circumferential resection margins, or the distance of the tumor to both the aboral or lateral resection margin, but two positive resection margins were only present after SILS and not after conventional surgery. Hospitalization tended to be shorter after SILS (p = 0.097). Overall, morbidity was equivalent between the two groups, with a difference for colon cancer where it was significantly lower after SILS as compared to open surgery (p = 0.025) mainly due to a lower rate of wound complications. CONCLUSION: SILS might be an acceptable alternative to open surgery for the treatment of colon cancer. For rectal cancer, no apparent benefit could be documented. As no sufficient data on the oncologic quality are available, single-incision laparoscopic surgery can yet not be recommended for the treatment of rectal cancer out of clinical trials.

Conventional mesh repair of a giant iatrogenic bilateral diaphragmatic hernia with an enterothorax.

PURPOSE: Diaphragmatic hernias (DHs) are divided into congenital and acquired hernias, most of which are congenital. Among acquired DHs, up to 80% are left-sided, only a few iatrogenic DHs have been reported, and bilateral hernias are extremely rare. For diagnostic reasons, many DHs are overlooked by ultrasonography or X-ray and are only recognized at a later stage when complications occur. METHODS: In 2009, we performed three partial diaphragm replacements in our clinic for repairing DHs using a PERMACOL™ implant. RESULTS: As all patients had uneventful postoperative courses and the clinical outcomes were very good, we present one special case of a 65-year-old male with a giant iatrogenic bilateral DH with an enterothorax. CONCLUSION: We see a good indication for diaphragm replacements by using a PERMACOL™ implant for fixing especially DHs with huge hernial gaps and in cases with fragile tissue.

Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ileocecal resection for Crohn's disease before the era of biologics.

BACKGROUND: Crohn's disease (CD) of the terminal ileum not responding to standard medical treatment is more and more treated with biologics instead of surgery. In order to get more information on the results of surgery, we analyzed the outcome of laparoscopic ileocecal resection (LICR) performed before the widespread use of these drugs. METHODS: Chart reviews and telephone follow-ups were performed on 119 patients treated with laparoscopic ileocecal resection for CD. Follow-ups were performed at a median of 58 (17-124) and 113(69-164) months. Symptomatic restenosis requiring surgery or endoscopic dilatation was the primary endpoint. We further analyzed risk factors of recurrence. RESULTS: Of the 119 patients initially treated, 18 required surgery (n = 14) or endoscopic dilatation (n = 4). The calculated rates of re-intervention were 10 und 17.5 % at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Ninety percent of the patients had a Crohn-specific medication treatment at the time of surgery, but only 51.4 und 46.9 % at FU 1 und 2, respectively. Smoking increased the risk of recurrence (OR 3.7, P = 0.011). CONCLUSION: The data demonstrate excellent long-term results of LICR for CD of the terminal ileum. Surgery should be considered as a first choice treatment in many patients with ileocecal CD not responding to conventional treatment.

Malignant melanoma of the ileo-anal pouch anastomosis after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: report of a case.

A 62 year-old patient with therapy-refractory pouchitis after proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis was admitted with hematochezia and abdominal discomfort. A malignant melanoma (MM) was found after repeated biopsies of the pouch. Complete staging revealed no evidence for distant metastases and the patient underwent abdominoperineal pouch resection. Six weeks later, the patient was readmitted because of severe general deterioration and diffuse metastatic spread to the liver was found. The patient died of hepatorenal syndrome shortly thereafter.Patients with inflammatory bowel disease are at increased risk of developing cancer, including rarities such as MM. Our experience stresses the importance of repeated biopsies in therapy-refractory pouchitis.

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery: outcomes from 224 colonic resections performed at a single center using SILS.

BACKGROUND: Compared with single-incision laparoscopy, multiport laparoscopy is associated with greater risk of postoperative wound pain, infection, incisional hernias, and suboptimal cosmetic outcomes. The feasibility of minimally invasive single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for colorectal procedures is well-established, but outcome data remain limited. METHODS: Patients with benign diverticular disease, Crohn's disease, or ulcerative colitis admitted to Klinikum Leverkusen, Germany, for colonic resection between July 2009 and March 2011 (n = 224) underwent single-incision laparoscopic surgery using the SILS port system. Surgeons had ≥7 years' experience in laparoscopic colon surgery but no SILS experience. Patient demographic and clinical data were collected prospectively. Pain was evaluated by using a visual analog scale (0-10). Data were analyzed by using the SPSS PASW Statistics 18 database. RESULTS: The majority of patients underwent sigmoid colectomy with high anterior resection (AR) or left hemicolectomy (n = 150) for diverticulitis. Our conversion rate to open surgery was 6.3 %, half in patients undergoing sigmoid colectomy with high AR or left hemicolectomy, 95 % of whom had diverticulitis. Mean operating time was 166 ± 74 (range, 40-441) min in the overall population, with shorter times for single-port transanal tumor resection (SPTTR; 89 ± 51 min; range, 40-153 min) and longer times for proctocolectomy (325 min; range, 110-441 min). Mean hospital stay was approximately 10 days, longer after abdominoperineal rectal resection or proctocolectomy (12-16 days). Most complications occurred following sigmoid colectomy with high AR or left hemicolectomy [19/25 (76 %) of early and 4/5 (80 %) of late complications, respectively]. Pain was <4 on a scale of 0-10 in all cases on postoperative day 1, and typically decreased during the next 2 days. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the feasibility and tolerability of colorectal surgery, conducted by experienced laparoscopic surgeons without specific training in use of the SILS port.

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery: a promising approach to sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic sigmoidectomy has become the standard procedure in elective surgery for recurrent diverticular disease. To realize further benefits of this minimal invasive procedure and to offer less postoperative pain, shorter recovery time, reduced complications, and improved cosmetic results, attempts are being made to minimize the number of necessary skin incisions for trocar positioning. One method is to use only one port for laparoscopic access to perform diverticular-related elective sigmoidectomies. METHODS: Between 7 July and 4 August 2009, 10 consecutive patients were referred for partial left colon resection due to multiple episodes of diverticulitis. In all cases, access to the abdomen was achieved through a 2- to 2.5-cm single incision via the umbilicus followed by insertion of the single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS™) port system. Outcomes such as change in the procedural method, operative time, postoperative complications, and length of stay were recorded. RESULTS: Of the 10 consecutive sigmoidectomies, 9 were performed successfully with the SILS™ procedure using only one incision in the umbilicus. No mortalities or major complications were noted. The median operating time was 120 min, and the median postoperative hospital stay was 7 days. CONCLUSION: As an alternative to the standard laparoscopic procedure, single-incision laparoscopic sigmoidectomy via the umbilicus is technically feasible and effective. This attractive procedure aims to increase the patient's comfort further after abdominal surgery.

Does mesorectal preservation protect the ileoanal anastomosis after restorative proctocolectomy?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The technique of rectal dissection during restorative proctocolectomy might influence the rate of septic complications. The aim of this study was to analyze the morbidity of restorative proctocolectomy in a consecutive series of patients who had rectal dissection with complete preservation of the mesorectum. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred thirty-one patients who had restorative proctocolectomy for chronic inflammatory bowel disease with handsewn ileopouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) and preservation of the mesorectal tissue were analyzed by chart reviews and a follow-up investigation at a median of 85 (14-169) months after surgery. RESULTS: Only one of 131 patients had a leak from the IPAA, and one patient had a pelvic abscess without evidence of leakage, resulting in 1.5% local septic complications. All other complications including the pouch failure rate (7.6%) and the incidence of both fistula (6.4%) and pouchitis (47.9%) were comparable to the data from the literature. CONCLUSION: The low incidence of local septic complications in this series might at least in part result from the preservation of the mesorectum. As most studies do not specify the technique of rectal dissection, this theory cannot be verified by an analysis of the literature and needs further approval by a randomized trial.

The colon J-pouch as a cause of evacuation disorders after rectal resection: myth or fact?

BACKGROUND: Colon J-pouch (JCP) reconstructions result in a better functional outcome than straight coloanal anastomosis (SCA) in terms of continence and frequency of defecation after rectal resection but might be associated with more evacuation difficulties. In order to evaluate this hypothesis, we systematically reviewed the literature to collect data on evacuation disorders after rectal resection in randomized or otherwise comparative trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Randomized controlled trials and comparative trials evaluating CJP versus SCA, latero-terminal anastomosis (LTA), and transverse coloplasty pouch (TCP) were ascertained by methodical search using Medline, Embase, and PubMed. Pooled estimates of outcomes were calculated for early-, intermediate-, and long-term follow-up. Primary meta-analysis outcomes were sensation of incomplete evacuation, prolonged evacuation, use of laxatives, use of enemas and suppositories, and stool fragmentation. RESULTS: When compared to SCA, CJP was associated with significantly less "prolongation of evacuation" but more "use of laxatives" in the intermediate-term follow-up, while both less "sensation of incomplete evacuation" and less "fragmentation" was found after CJP in the long-term. When compared to TCP, CJP was associated with significantly less fragmentation in the intermediate-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Evacuation disorders are a unique problem of low anterior resection and are not specifically related to the colon J-pouch.

Modified ileocecal interposition. The final sphincter-saving solution after failed salvage surgery for anastomotic complications of low anterior resection.

INTRODUCTION: Reversal of low Hartmann's procedures can be a challenging operation. We report on the successful treatment of patients who have already had prior salvage surgery for complications of a low colorectal anastomosis presenting with active fistulas from the rectal remnant. METHODS: An ileocolic segment was mobilized with the neurovascular pedicle of the ileocolic artery and turned counterclockwise into the pelvis. The fistulas were cured and a hand-sutured colo-anal anastomosis was performed at the level of the dentate line. Almost the entire length of the remnant colon was preserved. RESULTS: There was no morbidity. The functional outcome was good or reasonable and the subjective satisfaction with the outcome was very high. CONCLUSION: We conclude that an ileocolic segment is an excellent substitute for reversal of low Hartmann's procedures even in patients in whom prior salvage surgery has failed. As the functional outcome is slightly inferior to other alternatives for rectal replacement, its use should be restricted to patients with complex local situations or in whom alternative reconstructions would result in significant loss of bowel length.

Evaluation of vector manometry for characterization of functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy.

AIM: The impact of 3-dimensional vector manometry (VM) for characterization of the functional outcome of restorative proctocolectomy (RP) was studied in 61 patients at a median of 86 months after RP for ulcerative colitis. METHODS: A 14-day continence diary was utilized to quantify continence, urgency, and the frequency of defecation. The clinical outcome data were correlated to the physiology parameters of VM and volumetry. RESULTS: VM parameters at rest correlated with postoperative continence but not substantially with stool frequency and urgency. High radial asymmetry was significantly correlated with the degree of incontinence (r=0.333, p=0.013). Resting pressures demonstrated a better correlation with the degree of incontinence when documented for the high-pressure zone (HPZ; portion of the sphincter with at least 50% of the maximum pressure; r=0.301, p=0.025) and when performed in the continuous pull-through technique. Stool frequency and urgency were better characterized by volumetry parameters like threshold volumes and pouch compliance. The specificity and sensitivity of the vector volume at rest of the HPZ for the prediction of incontinence was 63.6% and 59.1%, respectively. The corresponding values were 67% and 68%, respectively, for radial asymmetry at rest. Stool frequency and urgency were better characterized by volumetry parameters like threshold volumes and pouch compliance. CONCLUSION: A strong anal sphincter at rest and a consistent radial distribution of the sphincter pressure are the most reliable indicators of continence after RP obtained by VM, but their clinical usefulness is limited.

Pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration of moxifloxacin in intervention therapy for intra-abdominal abscess.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Intra-abdominal abscesses are usually polymicrobial and involve a variety of aerobic and anaerobic organisms. Thus, in addition to adequate drainage, empirical coverage with broad-spectrum antimicrobials is central to the management of such abscesses and an understanding of pharmacokinetic properties can be valuable when selecting antimicrobial agents. The present study examined the penetration of the fluoroquinolone antimicrobial moxifloxacin into abdominal abscess fluid in patients with an intra-abdominal abscess. METHODS: This was a non-randomized, open-label, single-centre trial. Eight patients with CT or ultrasound evidence of a localized intra-abdominal abscess requiring interventional drainage without signs of generalized peritonitis were considered suitable candidates for pharmacokinetic analysis. Each patient received a single dose of moxifloxacin 400 mg by intravenous infusion. Paired samples of blood and abscess fluid were collected over 24 hours for pharmacokinetic analysis. RESULTS: Following intravenous infusion, moxifloxacin penetrated and accumulated in intra-abdominal abscess fluid. The abscess fluid/plasma concentration ratio increased continuously from 0.083 (95% CI 0.047, 0.147) at 2 hours after administration to 1.66 (95% CI 0.935, 2.946) at 24 hours; concentrations in abscess fluid tended to exceed those in plasma after 12-24 hours. Half-life and mean residence time were longer in abscess fluid than in plasma, suggesting that moxifloxacin accumulates in abscess fluid. The abscess fluid/plasma concentration ratio continued to increase throughout the 24-hour sampling period, indicating that equilibrium between plasma and abscess fluid was not reached during this time. High intersubject variability for total moxifloxacin concentrations in intra-abdominal abscess fluid was noted, suggesting that abscess wall permeability is likely to be the parameter most strongly influencing moxifloxacin pharmacokinetics in abscess fluid. Comparison of the study results with data obtained from other in vitro studies suggested that abscess fluid concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentrations for pathogens commonly isolated in intra-abdominal infections were maintained for approximately 8 hours after administration in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Moxifloxacin penetrates intra-abdominal abscesses after interventional drainage. Based on the pharmacokinetic data, moxifloxacin is a good candidate therapy for use in patients with intra-abdominal abscesses undergoing CT-guided percutaneous drainage and may also prove valuable in the general systemic management of intra-abdominal abscesses in the future.