Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Hepatol ; 47(4): 476-83, 2007 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17629590

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIMS: While combination of peginterferon-alpha (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) therapy is the current standard of care for chronic hepatitis C (CHC), only 44-51% of genotype-1 patients achieve a sustained virological response (SVR), and both agents produce treatment-limiting toxicities. In the hepatitis C virus (HCV) replicon system, merimepodib (MMPD), a novel, selective inhibitor of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase, has shown potent antiviral effects. METHODS: This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study evaluated the safety and antiviral activity of PEG-IFN-alpha2b and RBV combined with either placebo, 25mg MMPD every 12h (q12h), or 50mg MMPD q12h in interferon-alpha (IFN) and RBV nonresponders. After 24 weeks of treatment, subjects with undetectable HCV RNA were proposed to continue assigned treatment for up to 24 additional weeks. RESULTS: The PEG-IFN-alpha, RBV, and MMPD combination was well tolerated at both doses. After 24 weeks, the proportion of HCV RNA undetectable subjects was 8/11 (73%) in the 50-mg MMPD group, 2/10 (20%) in the 25-mg MMPD group, and 3/10 (30%) in the placebo group (P=0.02, Jonckheere-Terpstra test for increasing dose response). Ten subjects entered and completed an extension study, at Week 48, 2 of 2 (100%) of the 25-mg and 3 of 5 (60%) of the 50-mg subjects remained HCV RNA undetectable, compared with 3 of 3 (100%) of the placebo subjects. At Follow-up Week 24, 2 (100%) of the 25-mg , and 1 (25%) of the 50-mg subjects remained undetectable, compared with 1 (33%) of the placebo subjects. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses showed a correlation between MMPD exposure and early virological response at week 12, but not with hemoglobin decreases often associated with RBV. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, PEG-IFN-alpha2b and RBV combined with 50 mg MMPD q12h was well tolerated and induced virological response with undetectable HCV RNA in IFN-alpha and RBV nonresponders.


Assuntos
Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Carbamatos/uso terapêutico , Hepatite C Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Interferon-alfa/uso terapêutico , Compostos de Fenilureia/uso terapêutico , Ribavirina/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Carbamatos/farmacocinética , Carbamatos/farmacologia , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Hepacivirus/isolamento & purificação , Humanos , Interferon alfa-2 , Interferon-alfa/farmacocinética , Interferon-alfa/farmacologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Compostos de Fenilureia/farmacocinética , Compostos de Fenilureia/farmacologia , Placebos , Polietilenoglicóis , RNA Viral/sangue , Proteínas Recombinantes , Ribavirina/farmacocinética , Ribavirina/farmacologia , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Anticancer Res ; 26(5B): 3877-83, 2006.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17094417

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The objective of this phase III study was to compare the safety and efficacy of FLP (modulation of 5-FU (Fluorouracil) by folinic acid or leucovorin (LV) and cisplatin vs. FP (5-FU combined with Cisplatin) as a first line chemotherapy in advanced oesophageal, gastric and pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 232 patients with measurable lesions were randomised to receive at the first cycle either FP (arm A: 5-FU 800 mg/m2/d in continuous infusion 5 days and cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1 or 2), or FLP (arm B: LV, 100 mg/m2/d in bolus 5 days, followed by 5-FU 350 mg/m2/d in 1 h infusion 5 days and cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1 or 2). In case of no grade 3-4 haematological and diarrhoea toxicity, the dose of 5-FU was increased to 1000 mg/m2/d and 400 mg/m2/d in the two arms respectively, for the subsequent cycles until disease progression. RESULTS: The distribution of primary tumours was: 19 squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus, 19 oesophageal adenocarcinoma, 91 gastric and 97 pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Safety remained acceptable and comparable in the two arms except for the severe grade 3-4 mucositis, which was lower in arm B (4.5 vs. 16.4%, p < 0.009). Efficacy in terms of tumour response and survival was similar in the two arms, showing an objective response rate (after external review) of 18.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 11.4-25.8%) in arm A vs. 15% (95% CI 8.5-21.6%) in arm B, an overall median survival of 24 weeks in arm A vs. 24.7 in arm B (p = 0.83) and a progression-free median survival of 12.4 weeks vs. 12.1 in arms A and B, respectively (p = 0.91). CONCLUSION: The FLP regimen is substantially equivalent to FP in terms of safety and quality of life, as well as for antitumour efficacy in these carcinomas; the only slight advantage of FLP in this study concerns mucositis. Based on these results, FLP could be used as an alternative to FP when appropriate.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/patologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica , Análise de Sobrevida
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...