Short anesthesia without intravenous fluid therapy in children: Results of a prospective non-interventional multicenter observational study.

BACKGROUND: The German guidelines recommend that intravenous fluid therapy should not be mandatorily performed in children with short fasting times undergoing short anesthesia, but there is a lack of clinical studies including a large number of pediatric patients. Therefore, we performed a prospective non-interventional multicenter observational study to evaluate the perioperative hemodynamic and metabolic stability of children undergoing short anesthesia without intravenous fluid therapy. AIMS: The primary aim was to assess the incidence of hypotension and the secondary aim was to assess the real preoperative fasting times, the incidence of hypoglycemia and the impact on ketone bodies and acid-base balance. METHODS: Children aged 1 month-18 years undergoing short anesthesia (<1 h) without intravenous fluid therapy were enrolled. Patient demographics, the surgical or diagnostic procedure performed, anesthesia, hemodynamic, laboratory data, and adverse events were documented using a standardized case report form. RESULTS: Four hundred and twenty seven children that were investigated at three pediatric centers from July 2021 to June 2022 (mean age 83.4 ± 58.9 months, body weight 27.9 ± 19.8 kg) were included in the analysis. The real preoperative fasting times were 14.2 ± 3.6 h for solids, 7.2 ± 3.5 h for milk and 5 ± 4.8 h for clear fluids. During the course of anesthesia, hypotension (<2.5th percentile) was detected in 3 of 427 cases (0.7%), hypoglycemia (glucose <3.0 mmol L-1) in 1 of 355 cases (0.3%), and ketosis (ketone bodies ≥0.6 mmol L-1) in 51 of 233 cases (21.9%). The occurrence of ketosis was associated with lower body weight (p <.001) and longer fasting times for solids or milk (p =.021), but not for clear fluids (p =.69). CONCLUSIONS: Our study supported the German guidelines recommendation that perioperative intravenous fluid therapy is not mandatory in children beyond the neonatal period with short pre- and postoperative fasting times undergoing short anesthesia (<1 h).

Women at familial risk of breast cancer electing for prophylactic mastectomy: frequencies, procedures, and decision-making characteristics.

BACKGROUND: Some women of families at high risk of breast cancer (BC) choose prophylactic mastectomy (PM) in spite of ambiguous evidence for survival benefits. The aim of this study was to investigate counselees' characteristics, decisions on PM, and frequencies of different procedures to better understand how to tailor interventions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eight hundred and forty-nine counselees who attended interdisciplinary consultation for genetic risk adjustment at the University Hospital Heidelberg between July 2009 and July 2011 received a tripartite questionnaire addressing sociodemographic characteristics, psychological parameters, behavioural questions, and medical data. RESULTS: Six hundred and twelve of the 849 counselees (72%) returned the questionnaire. Four hundred were classified as high risk of genetic BC (19.5% BRCA mutation carriers; 4% unclassified variant (UV); and 76.5% calculated as high risk by pedigree). Two hundred and thirteen out of 400 (53%) were diagnosed with BC. Fourteen out of 54 (27%) BRCA mutation carriers with BC chose contralateral PM (CPM) compared to 24/126 (14%) without a mutation but with a personal BC history (p = 0.2175). Of those without BC, 12/27 (44%) mutation carriers opted for bilateral PM (BPM) compared to none without a mutation (p < 0.0001). Women who received any PM (CPM and BPM) reported a higher emotional burden from partners (p = 0.003) and family (p = 0.008), more worries regarding children and family (p = 0.003) and were associated with positive mutation status and higher heterozygous and lifetime risk (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Although evidence on survival benefit is unclear in several clinical situations, a relevant number of counselees opt for PM. Counselees may decide based on other reasons than survival benefit.

Long-term experiences with genetic consultation in people with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

PURPOSE: Advances in genetics and increased public awareness increased the demand for interdisciplinary genetic outpatient consultation (IOGC). Communicating cancer risk is complex, and ideally information transfer should be individualized. Although psychological experiences with genetic testing have been studied in detail, studies on long-term experiences with IOGC and information transfer are lacking. We assessed patients' understanding and satisfaction with IOGC in families at risk of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) with the aim of informing best clinical practice, improving compliance and informed decision-making. METHODS: Female counselees referred for IOGC between July 1, 2009 and July 1, 2011 were eligible. Data were collected using a 47-item postal questionnaire to assess sociodemographic, psychological, behavioral parameters. Overall satisfaction and personal usefulness of IOGC were assessed with a five-point, and risk perception with a visual analog scale. Data were analyzed using Spearman rank, Wilcoxon U or Chi-squared test. RESULTS: 612 (72 %) of 849 women participated reported being highly satisfied (75 %, n = 430) and declared personal usefulness (73 %, n = 421) on average 3.5 years after IOGC. Women deemed "high risk" assessed their risk of developing BC as significantly higher than non-high-risk counselees (3.2 versus 3.0, p = 0.00484). Risk perception was lower in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers than in women with unclassified variants or no mutation (2.8 versus 3.5 and 3.1, respectively). CONCLUSION: Women with an HBOC background have additional needs to achieve long-term satisfaction after IOGC. Prospective studies are required to optimize care for the increasing number of people who seek genetic consultation, particularly as the complexity of genetics knowledge increases.

Adherence to the breast cancer surveillance program for women at risk for familial breast and ovarian cancer versus overscreening: a monocenter study in Germany.

Breast cancer (BC) is the leading cancer among women worldwide and in 5-10 % of cases is of hereditary origin, mainly due to BRCA1/2 mutations. Therefore, the German Consortium for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) with its 15 specialized academic centers offers families at high risk for familial/hereditary cancer a multimodal breast cancer surveillance program (MBCS) with regular breast MRI, mammography, ultrasound, and palpation. So far, we know a lot about the psychological effects of genetic testing, but we know little about risk-correlated adherence to MBCS or prophylactic surgery over time. The aim of this study was to investigate counselees' adherence to recommendations for MBCS in order to adjust the care supply and define predictors for incompliance. All counselees, who attended HBOC consultation at the University Hospital Heidelberg between July 01, 2009 and July 01, 2011 were eligible to participate. A tripartite questionnaire containing sociodemographic information, psychological parameters, behavioral questions, and medical data collection from the German consortium were used. A high participation rate was achieved among the study population, with 72 % returning the questionnaire. This study showed a rate of 59 % of full-adherers to the MBCS. Significant predictors for partial or full adherence were having children (p = 0.0221), younger daughters (p = 0.01795), a higher awareness of the topic HBOC (p = 0.01795, p < 0.0001), a higher perceived breast cancer risk (p < 0.0001), and worries (p = 0.0008)/impairment (p = 0.0257) by it. Although the current data suggest a good adherence of MBCS, prospective studies are needed to understand counselees' needs to further improve surveillance programs and adherence to them. Adherence to the breast cancer surveillance program for women at risk for familial breast and ovarian cancer versus overscreening-a monocenter study in Germany.