Performance evaluation of a Test&Treat rapid detection kit for the diagnosis of septic effusions in dogs and cats.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of a veterinary point-of-care (POC) luminometer-based kit for the diagnosis of septic peritoneal or pleural effusion in dogs and cats. DESIGN: Prospective study performed between January 2020 and July 2021. SETTING: University teaching hospital. ANIMALS: Forty-eight animals with naturally occurring peritoneal or pleural effusion collected by aseptic abdominocentesis or thoracocentesis. PROCEDURES: Effusion samples were split into filtered (using a 10-micron filter) and unfiltered aliquots and analyzed by the POC instrument according to the manufacturer's instructions and following variable incubation periods. Samples were also plated aerobically on standard and blood agar plates. Proprietary reagents were added to samples, causing bacterial ATP to generate bioluminescence that is detected by the luminometer. Bioluminescence values (relative light units [RLUs]) were recorded and compared with the presence of bacterial growth on the culture plates. Nucleated cell counts in native and filtered effusion samples were recorded. RESULTS: Twenty-one samples were septic based on positive culture. RLUs were higher in septic effusions for filtered and native effusions compared with sterile effusions. The use of a filter reduced cell counts. In filtered samples incubated for 30 minutes before testing, the sensitivity and specificity of the luminometer for diagnosis of infection in cavitary effusions were 81% and 82%, respectively, using a cutoff of 12,202 RLUs. CONCLUSIONS: The luminometer kit evaluated in this study represents a viable screening tool for diagnosis of septic cavitary effusions and could be used in conjunction with other POC diagnostics to support the rapid diagnosis of infection.

Clinical features and outcome of septic shock in dogs: 37 Cases (2008-2015).

OBJECTIVES: To describe patient characteristics of dogs with septic shock, investigate markers of disease severity, and assess treatment impact on outcome. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Single center, university veterinary teaching intensive care unit. ANIMALS: Thirty-seven dogs with septic shock. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mean number of organ dysfunction was 3.24 ± 1.0, and included cardiovascular (100%), respiratory (73%), hematologic (68%), renal (49%), and hepatic (32%) dysfunction. The gastrointestinal tract was the most common source of sepsis. Mean blood pressure prior to resuscitation was 50 ± 8 mm Hg. All dogs were given IV fluids before vasopressor therapy with a mean rate of 12.1 ± 11.0 mL/kg/h. All dogs were given antimicrobials, administered within a mean of 4.3 ± 5.7 hours after diagnosis. Dopamine or norepinephrine was administered IV, respectively in 51.3% and 37.8% of dogs, with a mean duration of hypotension of 2.6 ± 3.0 hours. Mortality rate was 81.1%. Survivors were more likely to have a feeding tube (P = 0.007) and to have gastrointestinal sepsis (P = 0.012), and less likely to have respiratory dysfunction (P < 0.001). APPLEFull scores (P = 0.014) and time to antimicrobial therapy (P = 0.047) were identified as predictors of mortality. Treatment bundles consisting of 7 interventions that may improve outcomes in people with septic shock were evaluated. Survivors received 4.1 ± 1.3 interventions, whereas nonsurvivors received 2.4 ± 1.4 (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Septic shock in dogs confers a guarded prognosis. Early antimicrobial therapy and the utilization of treatment bundles may increase survivability in dogs with septic shock. More research is warranted to investigate the impact of specific interventions on survival.