Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26693033

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine long-term (11-month) antidepressant efficacy of desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d across a broad range of clinical and functional outcomes in patients with major depressive disorder. METHOD: Adult outpatients (≥ 18 years) with major depressive disorder (DSM-IV criteria) and a 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) total score ≥ 20 at screening and baseline who responded to 8 weeks of open-label desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d and had a continuing stable response through week 20 were randomly assigned to receive placebo or desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d in a 6-month, double-blind, randomized withdrawal period. Depressive symptoms were evaluated using the HDRS-17, 6-item HDRS, and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Ilness and -Improvement (CGI-S, CGI-I). Health outcomes included the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire and the World Health Organization 5-Item Well-Being Index (WHO-5). The trial was conducted from June 2009 to March 2011 at 87 study sites in 14 countries worldwide. RESULTS: Of 874 patients enrolled in open-label treatment, 548 patients were randomly assigned to receive double-blind placebo (n = 276) or desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d (n = 272). At the end of the 6-month double-blind treatment, improvements in depressive symptoms were better maintained among the desvenlafaxine- than placebo-treated patients on all efficacy endpoints (all P ≤ .001); in the desvenlafaxine group, 21.8% (vs 42.9% in the placebo group) had CGI-I ratings of 5, 6, and 7 (minimally worse/much worse/very much worse), and 74.4% met criteria for remission (placebo: 54.2%). WPAI and WHO-5 scores indicated significantly better productivity and well-being with continued desvenlafaxine (vs placebo, P ≤ .001). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term treatment with desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d maintained improvements in major depressive disorder among adult outpatients who exhibited a stable therapeutic response. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00887224.

2.
J Clin Psychiatry ; 74(2): 158-66, 2013 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23473348

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term (11-month) efficacy and safety of desvenlafaxine (administered as desvenlafaxine succinate) at the recommended 50-mg/d dose in preventing relapse in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). METHOD: Adult outpatients (age ≥ 18 years) with MDD (DSM-IV criteria) and a 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS17) total score ≥ 20 at screening and baseline were enrolled in a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized withdrawal trial conducted between June 2009 and March 2011. Patients who responded to 8-week open-label treatment with desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d with continuing stable response through week 20 were randomly assigned to receive placebo or desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d in a 6-month, double-blind, randomized withdrawal period. The primary efficacy endpoint was time to relapse following randomization to double-blind treatment, which was compared between groups using the log-rank test. Relapse was defined as HDRS17 total score ≥ 16, discontinuation for unsatisfactory response, hospitalization for depression, suicide attempt, or suicide. Safety and tolerability data were collected throughout the trial. RESULTS: A total of 874 patients were enrolled; 548 patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo (n = 276) or desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d (n = 272) in the double-blind withdrawal period. Time to relapse was significantly shorter for placebo versus desvenlafaxine (P < .001). At the end of the 6-month double-blind treatment, the estimated probability of relapse was 30.2% for placebo versus 14.3% for desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d. Safety and tolerability results were generally consistent with those in short-term studies of desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d. CONCLUSIONS: Desvenlafaxine at the recommended dose of 50 mg/d was effective in relapse prevention of depression during a 6-month period in patients who demonstrated stable response after 20 weeks of open-label desvenlafaxine treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00887224.


Assuntos
Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Cicloexanóis/uso terapêutico , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/prevenção & controle , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/uso terapêutico , Antidepressivos/administração & dosagem , Antidepressivos/efeitos adversos , Cicloexanóis/administração & dosagem , Cicloexanóis/efeitos adversos , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/tratamento farmacológico , Succinato de Desvenlafaxina , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevenção Secundária , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/administração & dosagem , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
J Psychiatr Pract ; 19(1): 5-14, 2013 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23334675

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of low-dose desvenlafaxine (administered as desvenlafaxine succinate) in treating major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: Adult outpatients (aged 18 years) in the United States and (aged 20 years) in Japan, who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition criteria for MDD and had a 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D17) score 20, were ran-domly assigned to placebo, low-dose desvenlafaxine (25▒mg/day), or the recommended dose (50▒mg/day) after a 6to 14-day placebo lead-in, in an 8-week, fixed-dose trial. The primary efficacy variable was change from baseline in HAMD17 total score at final on-therapy evaluation. Efficacy analyses were based on the intent-totreat (ITT) population, using the last observation carried forward. RESULTS: The ITT population included 699 patients. Reduction in HAM-D17 scores from baseline to final evaluation was not significantly greater for desvenlafaxine 25▒mg/day (-8.98) but was significantly greater for desvenlafaxine 50▒mg/day (-10.02; P = 0.016) versus placebo (-8.52) after adjusting for multiplicity. P-values were < 0.05 versus placebo for percentage of patients responding to treatment ( 50% decrease in HAM-D17 score) with desven-lafaxine 50▒mg/day (46%; P = 0.015), but not with desvenlafaxine 25▒mg/day (42% versus 35% with placebo). P-values for remission rates (HAM-D17 score ≤ 7) were not < 0.05 versus placebo for either desvenlafaxine treatment group. Discontinuations due to adverse events were observed in 2.6%, 3.4%, and 3.4% of patients treated with placebo, desvenlafaxine 25▒mg/day, and desvenlafaxine 50▒mg/day, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with other clinical studies, desvenlafaxine 50▒mg/day demonstrated antidepressant efficacy and appears to be the minimally effective dosage for MDD. ClinicalTrials study identifier NCT00798707.


Assuntos
Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Cicloexanóis/uso terapêutico , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Antidepressivos/efeitos adversos , Cicloexanóis/efeitos adversos , Succinato de Desvenlafaxina , Método Duplo-Cego , Eletrocardiografia/efeitos dos fármacos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...