Proof of concept of the Universal Baby video innovation for early child development in Lima, Peru.

OBJECTIVE: Community-based video interventions offer an effective and potentially scalable early interaction coaching tool for caregivers living in low resource settings. We tested the Universal Baby (UB) video innovation; an early interaction coaching tool using video sourced and produced locally with early child development (ECD) expert supervision. METHODS: This proof-of-concept study enrolled 40 caregivers of children ages 10-18 months assigned to intervention and control groups by health establishments in Carabayllo, Lima, Peru. Mother/child dyads received 12 weekly group health education sessions with social support. Of those, 16 caregivers also received 6 UB videos featuring brain science education and local clips of responsive, reciprocal interaction, also known as "serve and return" interaction. Survey data assessed feasibility and acceptability of the intervention. We assessed improved quality of mother/child interaction using the Parenting Interactions with Children: Checklist of Observations Linked to Outcomes (PICCOLO). RESULTS: We found the program feasible. We successfully trained the local team to produce UB videos using locally-sourced footage and delivered the videos as part of a community-based intervention. We also found it to be acceptable in that participants enthusiastically received the UB videos, reporting they enjoyed being videotaped, and learned how to recognize and appropriately respond to their child's nuanced sounds and gestures. The median change in total PICCOLO scores favored the intervention group compared to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: UB offers great potential as a sustainable, potentially scalable, and culturally appropriate tool to promote equity for child development among young children living in low resource homes globally.

Success at Scale: Outcomes of Community-Based Neurodevelopment Intervention (CASITA) for Children Ages 6-20 months With Risk of Delay in Lima, Peru.

This study is a randomized controlled trial of a 12-week community-based group parenting intervention ("CASITA") in Lima, Peru. CASITA improved neurodevelopment in a pilot study of 60 Peruvian children and subsequently scaled to 3,000 households throughout the district. The objective of this study was to assess intervention effectiveness when implemented at scale. A total of 347 children ages 6-20 months (52.7% male, 100% identified as "mestizo") at risk for developmental difficulties were randomized to immediate or delayed CASITA. At 3 months after enrollment, the immediate arm showed significantly higher overall development, based on the Extended Ages and Stages Questionnaire and Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment scores (Cohen's ds = .36 and .31, respectively). Programs demonstrably effective at scale could help address children's development risks worldwide.

Pregnant women in treatment for opioid use disorder: Material hardships and psychosocial factors.

BACKGROUND: While pregnant women in treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) face considerable challenges, common material hardships- food insecurity and housing instability, known to negatively impact maternal-child health, have been inadequately researched within this population. This study describes food/housing hardships and evaluates associations with key psychosocial factors. METHODS: A single-site prospective study, 100 3rd trimester women receiving prenatal care and medication-assisted treatment for OUD were interviewed, including screening for food/housing hardships, depressive symptoms, intimate partner vulnerability; and self-reported post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) history. We developed a three-level categorization combining food/housing screening outcomes: 1) "both insecure"; 2) "either secure"; and 3) "both secure". Bivariate analyses and linear path analyses evaluated associations among psychosocial variables using "both secure" as the referent group. RESULTS: Of 100 women, 56% reported food insecurity; 61% housing instability; 42% "both insecure"; 33% "either insecure"; 25% "both secure". In unadjusted food/housing groups "either insecure" and "both insecure" reported significantly greater depressive symptoms; "both insecure" additionally reported significantly greater intimate partner vulnerability. Path analyses adjusted for PTSD and compared with "both secure" (adjusted mean = 6.2): "either insecure" had greater depressive symptom scores (adjusted means = 9.8, p = .01) while "both insecure" had greater depressive scores (adjusted means 10.5, p = .002). In addition, "both insecure" had a clinically important 5.7 point greater intimate partner vulnerability score. There were no significant interactions between food/housing and PTSD. CONCLUSIONS: Even in women receiving prenatal care and treatment for OUD, food/housing material hardships and associated psychosocial factors are of major concern, requiring screening and remediation.

Could prenatal food insecurity influence neonatal abstinence syndrome severity?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In general populations, prenatal food insecurity negatively affects maternal and infant health. Our aim was to estimate and test the association between prenatal food insecurity and neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) severity. DESIGN/SETTING: Single-site prospective cohort design. Women receiving opioid agonist treatment with methadone or buprenorphine were interviewed (including demographics and food insecurity) during the third trimester at the combined obstetric/opioid use disorder treatment clinic at Boston Medical Center (BMC) in Boston, MA, USA, a large urban safety-net hospital. During postnatal hospitalization, infants were assessed and treated per hospital NAS protocol. Maternal clinic and infant hospitalization data were abstracted from medical records. PARTICIPANTS: Women (n = 75; aged ≥ 18 years; fluent English; singleton pregnancy; intending to deliver at BMC and maintain parental custody) receiving care in the specialized clinic were study eligible (2013-15). Women who delivered infants < 36 weeks gestational age or required prolonged newborn intensive care unit stay were excluded from analyses. PRIMARY MEASUREMENTS: Predictors: validated two-question Hunger Vital Sign™ food insecurity screener; outcomes: extent of NAS pharmacological treatment and length of hospital stay (LOS) for NAS. FINDINGS: Of the mother-infant dyads, 61 (81%) infants were treated pharmacologically for NAS. Mean hospital LOS was 19.9 (standard deviation = 9.4) days. Maternal food insecurity (n = 43, 57.3%) was associated with infant NAS pharmacological treatment in logistic regression analyses individually adjusted for prenatal: maternal depression [adjusted odds ratios (aOR) = 3.69 (95% confidence intervals (CI) = 1.02-13.43, P = 0.05)] and methadone agonist treatment [aOR = 4.17 (95% CI = 1.05-16.50, P = 0.04)]. Associations of food insecurity and LOS were inconclusive regardless of covariate control (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Among women receiving opioid agonist treatment, prenatal food insecurity appears to be associated with increased risk for neonatal abstinence syndrome pharmacological treatment.

CASITA: a controlled pilot study of community-based family coaching to stimulate early child development in Lima, Peru.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the 3-month, community-based early stimulation coaching and social support intervention 'CASITA', delivered by community health workers, could improve early child development and caregiver-child interaction in a resource-limited district in Lima, Peru. DESIGN: A controlled two-arm proof-of-concept study. SETTING: Six neighbourhood health posts in Carabayllo, a mixed rural/urban district in Lima. Sessions were held in homes and community centres. PARTICIPANTS: Children aged 6-24 months who screened positive for risk of neurodevelopmental delay (using validated developmental delay tool) and poverty (using progress out of poverty tool) were enrolled with their caregivers. Dyads with children born >21 days early were excluded. INTERVENTION: 12-week parenting/support intervention plus nutritional support (n=41) or nutrition alone (n=19). OUTCOME MEASURES: Development and home environment differences and mean changes from baseline to 3 months postintervention were evaluated using age-adjusted z-scores on the Extended Ages and Stages Questionnaire (EASQ) and the Home Observation Measurement of the Environment (HOME) scores, respectively. RESULTS: Development in CASITA improved significantly in all EASQ domains, whereas the control group's z-scores did not improve significantly in any domain. The mean adjusted difference (MAD) in change in EASQ age-adjusted z-scores between the two study arms was 1.39 (95% CI 0.55 to 2.22); Cohen's d effect size of 0.87 (95% CI 0.23 to 1.50). Likewise, intervention significantly improved global HOME scores versus control group (MAD change of 6.33 (95% CI 2.12 to 10.55); Cohen's d of 0.85 (95% CI 0.28 to 1.41)). CONCLUSIONS: An evidence-based early intervention delivered weekly during 3 months by a community health worker significantly improved children's communication, motor and personal/social development in this proof-of-concept study.

Community-Based Needs Assessment of Neurodevelopment, Caregiver, and Home Environment Factors in Young Children Affected by HIV in Lima, Peru.

BACKGROUND: In many resource-poor settings such as Peru, children affected by HIV have a high prevalence of neurodevelopmental delays (NDDs) and remain excluded from adequate treatment. METHODS: Community health workers (CHWs) administered NDD screening instruments to assess child development and associated caregiver and household factors in 14 HIV-affected parent-child dyads. Focus group discussion with caregivers was conducted to explore their needs and behaviors around early child stimulation and to assess their perceptions of the screening experience. RESULTS: Over 70% of the children had abnormal classification in at least 1 (out of 5) developmental domains according to Ages and States Questionnaire-provided cutoff scores. Caregiver depression and stress were associated with abnormal development as were some parenting behavior factors. Knowledge about child development was low. Caregivers felt testing and discussing results with a CHW were very insightful. Reported caregiver behavior differed between caregivers with HIV-infected children and those with uninfected children. CONCLUSION: Taken together, these exploratory quantitative data suggest that parenting behaviors associated with low child development scores may be modifiable and that community-based testing is well received and informative to these HIV-infected caregivers.

Disclosure of diagnosis: to tell or not to tell?

CASE: Jimmy is an 8-year-old boy with hepatitis B, e antigen (HBeAg)-positive, HIV and hepatitis C negative, who was adopted from Vietnam when he was 5 years and has been followed in your primary care practice since that time. Before adoption, he lived in an orphanage, where he was placed soon after birth. Jimmy currently lives with his adoptive mother and grandparents. His adoptive father has amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and recently moved to a nursing home due to a need for more intensive care. Jimmy continues to see him regularly.Jimmy's mother presents today upset about a recent encounter with his hepatologist. During this visit, Jimmy's doctor was insistent that Jimmy should be told about his illness immediately. He felt that Jimmy "had a right to know" and that it was important for the protection of other children. Jimmy's family practices universal precautions and Jimmy is compliant with these safety measures. Jimmy's mother has chosen not to share his diagnosis with the school and in addition has not felt the time was right to disclose the diagnosis to Jimmy. He is asymptomatic, takes no medications, and is followed yearly by a hepatologist. His mother is concerned that Jimmy would have difficulty managing this information and maintaining a "secret." However, she also worries that he may feel his trust has been violated if she delays telling him.Jimmy is currently 8 years old, in second grade, and is struggling academically with math and reading. Socially, he is reported to have difficulty making friends and reading social cues. For example, he displays inappropriate boundaries, often standing too close or touching others, which has resulted in children avoiding him. During your annual visit, Jimmy presented as a friendly and engaging boy. He maintained conversation about school and some of his interests, but he was often distractible, impulsive, at times grabbing things, and fidgety, frequently standing up and then sitting back down. Jimmy's mother reports that this behavior is similar to what he exhibits in the classroom. He is currently receiving English as a Second Language services and is enrolled in a weekly "lunch bunch." What advice would you give the family?