COVID-19 Diagnosis in Patients With Acute Abdominal Pain Without Respiratory Symptoms: A UK Emergency General Surgical Unit Experience.

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence has emerged reporting atypical clinical symptoms of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19). There is a sparsity of existing studies examining COVID-19-related abdominal pain and the role of investigative imaging for the virus in these patients. Study aims were to determine COVID-19 incidence in those with acute abdominal pain in the absence of respiratory symptoms and to assess the diagnostic performance of CT thoracic imaging in such patients. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients admitted to our emergency general surgical unit between 1st March 2020 and 31st May 2020 was performed. In adherence with national guidelines, all patients underwent nasal and oro-pharyngeal COVID-19 RT-PCR swabs as well as thoracic and abdominal computed tomography (CT) on admission. RESULTS: From 112 patients admitted with acute abdominal pain in the absence of respiratory symptoms, 16 (14.3%) tested positive for COVID-19 on RT-PCR swab testing. Overall, 50% (8/16) of these patients had no intra-abdominal pathology on CT. The sensitivity and specificity of CT thoracic imaging for diagnosing COVID-19 was 43.8% and 91.7%, respectively. Patients with positive COVID-19 swabs had higher C-reactive protein levels, lower potassium levels and a higher proportion of those with a low lymphocyte count. DISCUSSION: One in seven patients with abdominal pain without any respiratory symptoms tested positive for COVID-19. Half of these patients represented COVID-19 manifesting primarily as acute abdominal pain. Combined swab testing and CT imaging should be performed in all abdominal pain presentations due to the varying diagnostic performance of thoracic CT in diagnosing COVID-19.

Five year experience of gallbladder polyp surveillance and cost effective analysis against new European consensus guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Gallbladder polyp (GBP) surveillance seeks to identify early neoplasms, but practice varies amongst surgical units. Recent European consensus guidelines have recommended an evidence-based GBP surveillance strategy. In a tertiary centre Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary unit we examine GBP surveillance, malignant yield, and assess cost-effectiveness of the new European consensus guidelines. METHODS: Respective data were collected from all patients with ultrasonography-detected GBPs between January 2008 and January 2013. RESULTS: 558 patients had GBPs detected on ultrasonography. Following initial ultrasonography, 304 (54.5%) had further ultrasonography surveillance of which 168 were in a formal GBP surveillance programme. Pre-malignant/malignant pathology yield was 1.97% with an annual detection rate of 12.0 cases per 1000 GBPs surveyed. Cost-effectiveness analysis of European consensus guidelines calculated annual savings of £209 163 per 1000 GBPs surveyed. Compliance with these guidelines would result in an additional 12.5% of patients under surveillance requiring cholecystectomy. CONCLUSION: GBP surveillance uptake was suboptimal at 32.8%. The incidence of pre-malignant/malignant lesions in GBPs emphasises the importance of surveillance for early detection and management with a view to avoiding the poor outcomes associated with more advanced gallbladder cancer. Adherence to the new European consensus guidelines would be clinically cost-effective with significant potential savings demonstrated in this study.

Subfertility: What the Radiologist Needs to Know.

The role of imaging in subfertility is well established but is changing. In addition to traditional fertility assessments, there is an emerging role for the radiologist. The role of imaging in fertility-restoring procedures in benign disease and congenital malformations is evolving, and there is a growing need for accurate identification of young candidates suitable for fertility-preserving surgery in the oncologic setting. To facilitate this developing role, knowledge of the key imaging modalities used and potential therapeutic applications is important for accurate diagnosis and interpretation by the radiologist. ©RSNA, 2017.

Incidental non-benign gallbladder histopathology after cholecystectomy in an United Kingdom population: Need for routine histological analysis?

AIM: To analyse the range of histopathology detected in the largest published United Kingdom series of cholecystectomy specimens and to evaluate the rational for selective histopathological analysis. METHODS: Incidental gallbladder malignancy is rare in the United Kingdom with recent literature supporting selective histological assessment of gallbladders after routine cholecystectomy. All cholecystectomy gallbladder specimens examined by the histopathology department at our hospital during a five year period between March 2008 and March 2013 were retrospectively analysed. Further data was collected on all specimens demonstrating carcinoma, dysplasia and polypoid growths. RESULTS: The study included 4027 patients. The majority (97%) of specimens exhibited gallstone or cholecystitis related disease. Polyps were demonstrated in 44 (1.09%), the majority of which were cholesterol based (41/44). Dysplasia, ranging from low to multifocal high-grade was demonstrated in 55 (1.37%). Incidental primary gallbladder adenocarcinoma was detected in 6 specimens (0.15%, 5 female and 1 male), and a single gallbladder revealed carcinoma in situ (0.02%). This large single centre study demonstrated a full range of gallbladder disease from cholecystectomy specimens, including more than 1% neoplastic histology and two cases of macroscopically occult gallbladder malignancies. CONCLUSION: Routine histological evaluation of all elective and emergency cholecystectomies is justified in a United Kingdom population as selective analysis has potential to miss potentially curable life threatening pathology.

A comparison of outcomes for adults and children undergoing resection for inflammatory bowel disease: is there a difference?

Background. The incidence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is increasing in the paediatric population. Since 2007, a single surgeon whose main practice is in the treatment of adults has performed surgery for IBD in adults and children within two dedicated multidisciplinary teams. Our aim was to assess and compare outcomes for adults and children following surgery for IBD. Methods. Analysis of a prospectively collected database was carried out to include all patients who had undergone resectional surgery for IBD between 2007 and 2012. Results. 48 adults and 30 children were included in the study. Median age for children was 14 years (range 8-16) and for adults was 33.5 years (range 17-64). Median BMI was 23 (range 18-38) and 19 (range 13-29.5) in adults and children, respectively (P < 0.001). Laparoscopic resection was performed in 27 (90%) children and 36 (75%) adults. Postoperative complication rates were comparable, 11 (23%) in adults versus 6 (20%) in children (P = 1.00). Conclusion. Resectional surgery for IBD in children has outcomes that compare favourably with the adult population, with the majority of cases being performed by a laparoscopic approach.