Improved Evaluation Metrics for Sentence Suggestions in Nursing and Elderly Care Record Applications.

This paper presents a new approach called EmbedHDP, which aims to enhance the evaluation models utilized for assessing sentence suggestions in nursing care record applications. The primary objective is to determine the alignment of the proposed evaluation metric with human evaluators who are caregivers. It is crucial due to the direct relevance of the provided provided to the health or condition of the elderly. The motivation for this proposal arises from challenges observed in previous models. Our analysis examines the mechanisms of current evaluation metrics such as BERTScore, cosine similarity, ROUGE, and BLEU to achieve reliable metrics evaluation. Several limitations were identified. In some cases, BERTScore encountered difficulties in effectively evaluating the nursing care record domain and consistently providing quality assessments of generated sentence suggestions above 60%. Cosine similarity is a widely used method, but it has limitations regarding word order. This can lead to potential misjudgments of semantic differences within similar word sets. Another technique, ROUGE, relies on lexical overlap but tends to ignore semantic accuracy. Additionally, while BLEU is helpful, it may not fully capture semantic coherence in its evaluations. After calculating the correlation coefficient, it was found that EmbedHDP is effective in evaluating nurse care records due to its ability to handle a variety of sentence structures and medical terminology, providing differentiated and contextually relevant assessments. Additionally, this research used a dataset comprising 320 pairs of sentences with correspondingly equivalent lengths. The results revealed that EmbedHDP outperformed other evaluation models, achieving a coefficient score of 61%, followed by cosine similarity, with a score of 59%, and BERTScore, with 58%. This shows the effectiveness of our proposed approach in improving the evaluation of sentence suggestions in nursing care record applications.

Corrigendum: Estimation of subjective quality of life in schizophrenic patients using speech features.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1121034.].

Estimation of subjective quality of life in schizophrenic patients using speech features.

Introduction: Patients with schizophrenia experience the most prolonged hospital stay in Japan. Also, the high re-hospitalization rate affects their quality of life (QoL). Despite being an effective predictor of treatment, QoL has not been widely utilized due to time constraints and lack of interest. As such, this study aimed to estimate the schizophrenic patients' subjective quality of life using speech features. Specifically, this study uses speech from patients with schizophrenia to estimate the subscale scores, which measure the subjective QoL of the patients. The objectives were to (1) estimate the subscale scores from different patients or cross-sectional measurements, and 2) estimate the subscale scores from the same patient in different periods or longitudinal measurements. Methods: A conversational agent was built to record the responses of 18 schizophrenic patients on the Japanese Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale (JSQLS) with three subscales: "Psychosocial," "Motivation and Energy," and "Symptoms and Side-effects." These three subscales were used as objective variables. On the other hand, the speech features during measurement (Chromagram, Mel spectrogram, Mel-Frequency Cepstrum Coefficient) were used as explanatory variables. For the first objective, a trained model estimated the subscale scores for the 18 subjects using the Nested Cross-validation (CV) method. For the second objective, six of the 18 subjects were measured twice. Then, another trained model estimated the subscale scores for the second time using the 18 subjects' data as training data. Ten different machine learning algorithms were used in this study, and the errors of the learned models were compared. Results and Discussion: The results showed that the mean RMSE of the cross-sectional measurement was 13.433, with k-Nearest Neighbors as the best model. Meanwhile, the mean RMSE of the longitudinal measurement was 13.301, using Random Forest as the best. RMSE of less than 10 suggests that the estimated subscale scores using speech features were close to the actual JSQLS subscale scores. Ten out of 18 subjects were estimated with an RMSE of less than 10 for cross-sectional measurement. Meanwhile, five out of six had the same observation for longitudinal measurement. Future studies using a larger number of subjects and the development of more personalized models based on longitudinal measurements are needed to apply the results to telemedicine for continuous monitoring of QoL.