RESUMO
Introducción: La influencia de la clorhexidina sobre la fuerza de unión de los sistemas adhesivos es aún muy controversial. Objetivo: Determinar la fuerza de unión de dos adhesivos universales en dentina previa aplicación de la clorhexidina al 2 % en tiempos de aplicación diferentes. Métodos: Se empleó treinta incisivos y se desgastó la superficie vestibular para exponer la dentina. Posteriormente, se dividió aleatoriamente en seis grupos (n = 5). Se emplearon los adhesivos Single Bond Universal (SBU) y All-Bond Universal (ABU) con/sin clorhexidina. Grupo SBU-0: Single Bond Universal; Grupo SBU-30: clorhexidina por 30 segundos + Single Bond Universal; Grupo SBU-60: clorhexidina por 60 segundos + Single Bond Universal; Grupo ABU-0: All-Bond Universal; Grupo ABU-30: clorhexidina por 30 segundos + All-Bond Universal y Grupo ABU-60: clorhexidina por 60 segundos + All-Bond Universal. La resistencia adhesiva se analizó mediante ANOVA mixto de dos factores y post hoc de Tukey (p < 0,05). Resultados: La fuerza de unión para el grupo SBU-60 aumentó significativamente respecto al grupo control (p = 0,032). Igualmente, para los grupos ABU-30 y ABU-60, la fuerza de unión aumentó significativamente respecto al grupo control (p = 0,001) y (p = 0,000), respectivamente. Conclusión: La aplicación previa de clorhexidina al 2 % durante 60 segundos aumenta la fuerza de unión de los sistemas adhesivos Single Bond Universal y All-Bond Universal.
Introduction: The influence of chlorhexidine on the bond strength of adhesive systems is still very controversial. Objective: To determine the bond strength of two universal adhesives on dentin after application of 2% chlorhexidine at different application times. Methods: Thirty incisors were used and the vestibular surface was abraded to expose the dentin. Subsequently, they were randomly divided into six groups (n = 5). Single Bond Universal (SBU) and All-Bond Universal (ABU) adhesives with/without chlorhexidine were used. Group SBU-0: Single Bond Universal; Group SBU-30: chlorhexidine for 30 seconds + Single Bond Universal; Group SBU-60: chlorhexidine for 60 seconds + Single Bond Universal; Group ABU-0: All-Bond Universal; Group ABU-30: chlorhexidine for 30 seconds + All-Bond Universal and Group ABU-60: chlorhexidine for 60 seconds + All-Bond Universal. Adhesive strength was analyzed by two-factor mixed ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc (p < 0.05). Results: The bond strength for the SBU-60 group increased significantly with respect to the control group (p = 0.032). Similarly, for the ABU-30 and ABU-60 groups, the bond strength increased significantly with respect to the control group (p = 0.001) and (p = 0.000), respectively. Conclusion: Pre-application of 2% chlorhexidine for 60 seconds increases the bond strength of Single Bond Universal and All-Bond Universal adhesive systems.
RESUMO
Introduction: LED lamps have a new light-curing technology which can be monowave or polywave, which allows it to reach more initiators such as camphorquinone, Lucirin TPO and Propanodione, which have a wide variety of advantages and disadvantages. These lamps have evolved over time, as have different ergonomics, longevity, systems and quality standards. Objective: The objective of this literature review is to improve the clinician on the proper use of different LED lamps and how they influence the efficiency of resin photopolymerization. Material and methods: Extensive research has been carried out in the existing literature on this topic. From the beginning of this information until April 18, 2022, the bibliographic search carried out includes 86 articles published in the Medline database through PubMed, LILACS, Science Direct and SciELO, and there is no language restriction. Results: The photopolymerization effects of Polywave and Monowave LED lamps present significant differences between the compressive strength of the light-cured resin, with single-wave and polyvalent LED lamps where the types of light and lamp directly influence the compressive strength of the resin. composite resins. Conclusion: The type of light and lamp directly affects the efficiency of the photopolymerization of the composite resin, so it is concluded that LED lamps with single wave technology (Monowave) produce a greater depth of photopolymerization than those with multiple wave technology (Polywave).
RESUMO
La fractura de dientes ha sido descrita como un problema importante en odontología, y es la tercera causa más común de la pérdida de dientes después de la caries dental y la enfermedad periodontal; la pérdida de la estructura dental es un factor importante que disminuye la resistencia a la fractura. Las restauraciones de grandes defectos siguen siendo un problema clínico, para ello varios materiales y técnicas han surgido para aumentar la resistencia y la estabilidad del diente / restauración. (AU)
Fracture of teeth has been described as an important problem in dentistry, and is the third most common cause of tooth loss after dental caries and periodontal disease; loss of tooth structure is an important factor that decreases the fracture toughness. The Restauraciones large defect remains a clinical problem, for it various materials and techniques have emerged to increase the strength and stability of the tooth / restoration. (AU)
