Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 137(6): 961e-971e, 2016 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27219265

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although the safety profile of hyaluronic acid fillers is favorable, adverse reactions can occur. Clinicians and patients can benefit from ongoing guidance on adverse reactions to hyaluronic acid fillers and their management. METHODS: A multinational, multidisciplinary group of experts in cosmetic medicine convened the Global Aesthetics Consensus Group to review the properties and clinical uses of Hylacross and Vycross hyaluronic acid products and develop updated consensus recommendations for early and late complications associated with hyaluronic acid fillers. RESULTS: The consensus panel provided specific recommendations focusing on early and late complications of hyaluronic acid fillers and their management. The impact of patient-, product-, and technique-related factors on such reactions was described. Most of these were noted to be mild and transient. Serious adverse events are rare. Early adverse reactions to hyaluronic acid fillers include vascular infarction and compromise; inflammatory reactions; injection-related events; and inappropriate placement of filler material. Among late reactions are nodules, granulomas, and skin discoloration. Most adverse events can be avoided with proper planning and technique. Detailed understanding of facial anatomy, proper patient and product selection, and appropriate technique can further reduce the risks. Should adverse reactions occur, the clinician must be prepared and have tools available for effective treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse reactions with hyaluronic acid fillers are uncommon. Clinicians should take steps to further reduce the risk and be prepared to treat any complications that arise.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Consenso , Estética , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Ácido Hialurônico/administração & dosagem , Ácido Hialurônico/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Cirurgia Plástica , Algoritmos , Competência Clínica , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Fatores de Risco
2.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 137(5): 1410-1423, 2016 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27119917

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Combination of fillers and botulinum toxin for aesthetic applications is increasingly popular. Patient demographics continue to diversify, and include an expanding population receiving maintenance treatments over decades. METHODS: A multinational panel of plastic surgeons and dermatologists convened the Global Aesthetics Consensus Group to develop updated guidelines with a worldwide perspective for hyaluronic acid fillers and botulinum toxin. This publication considers strategies for combined treatments, and how patient diversity influences treatment planning and outcomes. RESULTS: Global Aesthetics Consensus Group recommendations reflect increased use of combined treatments in the lower and upper face, and some midface regions. A fully patient-tailored approach considers physiologic and chronologic age, ethnically associated facial morphotypes, and aesthetic ideals based on sex and culture. Lower toxin dosing, to modulate rather than paralyze muscles, is indicated where volume deficits influence muscular activity. Combination of toxin with fillers is appropriate for several indications addressed previously with toxin alone. New scientific data regarding hyaluronic acid fillers foster an evidence-based approach to selection of products and injection techniques. Focus on aesthetic units, rather than isolated rhytides, optimizes results from toxin and fillers. It also informs longitudinal treatment planning, and analysis of toxin nonresponders. CONCLUSIONS: The emerging objective of injectable treatment is facial harmonization rather than rejuvenation. Combined treatment is now a standard of care. Its use will increase further as we refine the concept that aspects of aging are intimately related, and that successful treatment entails identifying and addressing the primary causes of each. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, V.


Assuntos
Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/administração & dosagem , Técnicas Cosméticas , Preenchedores Dérmicos/administração & dosagem , Ácido Hialurônico/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Criança , Terapia Combinada , Elasticidade , Etnicidade , Face , Humanos , Lactente , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Rejuvenescimento , Envelhecimento da Pele
3.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 137(3): 518e-529e, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26910696

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Botulinum toxin type A injection remains the leading nonsurgical cosmetic procedure worldwide, with a high rate of efficacy and patient satisfaction. METHODS: A multinational, multidisciplinary group of plastic surgeons and dermatologists convened the Global Aesthetics Consensus Group to develop updated consensus recommendations with a worldwide perspective for botulinum toxin and hyaluronic acid fillers. This publication on botulinum toxin type A considers advances in facial analysis, injection techniques, and avoidance and management of complications. RESULTS: Use of botulinum toxin has evolved from the upper face to also encompass the lower face, neck, and midface. The Global Aesthetics Consensus Group emphasizes an integrative, diagnostic approach. Injection dosage and placement are based on analysis of target muscles in the context of adjacent ones and associated soft and hard tissues. The indication for selection of botulinum toxin as a primary intervention is that excessive muscular contraction is the primary etiology of the facial disharmony to be addressed. Global Aesthetics Consensus Group recommendations demonstrate a paradigm shift toward neuromodulation rather than paralysis, including lower dosing of the upper face, more frequent combination treatment with hyaluronic acid fillers, and intracutaneous injection where indicated to limit depth and degree of action. CONCLUSIONS: The accumulation of clinical evidence and experience with botulinum toxin has led to refinements in treatment planning and implementation. The Global Aesthetics Consensus Group advocates an etiology-driven, patient-tailored approach, to enable achievement of optimal efficacy and safety in patient populations that are rapidly diversifying with respect to ethnicity, gender, and age. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, V.


Assuntos
Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/uso terapêutico , Técnicas Cosméticas/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Envelhecimento da Pele/efeitos dos fármacos , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/efeitos adversos , Consenso , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Subcutâneas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neurotoxinas/administração & dosagem , Neurotoxinas/efeitos adversos , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Rejuvenescimento/fisiologia , Medição de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...