High viral loads combined with inflammatory markers predict disease severity in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: Results from the NOR-Solidarity trial.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate temporal changes in the association between SARS-CoV2 viral load (VL) and markers of inflammation during hospitalization, as well as the ability of these markers alone or in combination to predict severe outcomes. METHODS: Serial oropharyngeal and blood samples were obtained from hospitalized COVID-19 patients (n = 160). Levels of inflammatory markers and oropharyngeal VL were measured during hospitalization (admission, days 3-5, and days 7-10) and related to severe outcomes (respiratory failure/intensive care unit admission). RESULTS: Elevated admission levels of IL (interleukin)-6, IL-33, IL-8, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), interferon-γ-induced protein 10 (IP-10), IL-1ß, and IL-1Ra were associated with severe outcomes during hospitalization. Although no inflammatory markers correlated with VL at baseline, there was a significant correlation between VL and levels of IP-10 and MCP-1 at days 3-5, accompanied by IL-8 and IL-6 at days 7-10. Finally, there was a seemingly additive effect of IP-10, MCP-1, and IL-6 in predicting severe outcomes when combined with high VL at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: An increasing number of inflammatory markers were associated with VL during the first 10 days of hospitalization, and several of these markers were associated with severe outcomes, in particular when combined with elevated VL. Future studies should assess the potential for combining antiviral and immunomodulatory treatment, preferably guided by viral and inflammatory biomarkers, for the selection of high-risk patients.

Diagnostics, treatment and outcomes of cardiac sarcoidosis in a Norwegian cohort.

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based guidelines for cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) regarding use of second- and third-line agents, treatment duration, surveillance and prognostic factors are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the clinical presentation, diagnostics, treatment, monitoring and clinical outcomes in a Norwegian cohort. METHODS: Using discharge diagnoses between 2017 through 2020 from a large tertiary center, we identified 52 patients with CS. We performed a systematic chart review following a pre-specified checklist. The primary outcome of major cardiovascular events (MACE) was defined as a composite of cardiovascular hospitalization, defibrillator therapy, cardiac transplantation, or death. RESULTS: 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) showed pathological tracer uptake in 35/36 (97%) of immunosuppression-naïve patients. Immunosuppressive treatment was administered to 49/52 patients (94%) for a median of 43 (IQR 34) months; 69% were treated with second-line (methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil) and 25% with third-line (rituximab, infliximab) agents, respectively. Rituximab reduced inflammation as assessed by interval FDG-PET imaging and was overall well tolerated. Median duration to first MACE was 6 (IQR 10) months and 17/23 patients (74%) experienced a MACE within 12 months from CS diagnosis. No mortality was recorded and 20% achieved full remission. Age below the median of 53 years at time of diagnosis was associated with an increased risk of a MACE. CONCLUSION: Long-term immunosuppression including a liberal use of non-steroidal agents, appeared essential in treating CS. Although the burden of cardiovascular events was substantial, the survival was excellent in this contemporary cohort. Prospective randomized studies are urgently needed to define the best therapy for these patients.