Phase 1 Lymfactin® Study: 24-month Efficacy and Safety Results of Combined Adenoviral VEGF-C and Lymph Node Transfer Treatment for Upper Extremity Lymphedema.

BACKGROUND: Lymphedema is a common problem after breast cancer treatment. Lymfactin® is a prolymphangiogenic growth factor vector inducing the expression of human vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGF-C). It promotes growth and repair of lymphatic vessels. METHODS: Lymfactin® was combined with microvascular lymph node transfer surgery (VLNT) to study the safety and efficacy of the treatment in breast cancer-related upper limb lymphedema (BCRL) patients. This is a continuation study with a 3 year efficacy and 5 year safety follow-up. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were recruited in the study between June 2016 and February 2018. Three patients received a lower dose (1 × 1010 viral particles (vp)), and 12 patients received a higher dose (1 × 1011 vp) of Lymfactin®, respectively. In the higher dose group, the reduction of excess arm volume was on average 46% after the 12 month follow-up, and the transport index was improved in 7/12 patients. At baseline, removal of the compression garment for 7 days resulted in significant arm swelling (105.7±161.0 ml, p=0.0253). However, at 12 months, there was less and not significant swelling after removal of the garment (84.4±143.0 ml, p=0.0682). Lymphedema Quality of Life Inventory (LQOLI or LyQLI) questionnaire showed significant and sustained improvement of quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: During 24 months' of follow-up, the results indicate that Lymfactin® is well tolerated. The most promising findings were a 46% reduction in excess arm volume and a nonsignificant volume increase after garment removal at 12 months, suggesting that there is potential for the reduction of lymphedema.

Low TGF-ß1 in Wound Exudate Predicts Surgical Site Infection After Axillary Lymph Node Dissection.

PURPOSE: Surgical site infection (SSI) after axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for breast cancer increases morbidity and delays the onset of adjuvant treatment. Only a few studies have investigated the feasibility of wound exudate analysis in SSI prediction. This study assessed changes in cytokine levels in postsurgical wound exudate after ALND and examined their predictive value for the early diagnosis of SSI. METHODS: An observational prospective pilot study was conducted in 47 patients with breast cancer undergoing ALND. Wound exudate samples were collected on the first and sixth postoperative days (POD). Interleukin (IL)-1α, IL-1ß, IL-4, IL-10, IL-13, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), transforming growth factor beta1 (TGF-ß1) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) C and D levels were measured by immunoassay. Patients were followed to detect SSI. RESULTS: SSI was diagnosed in 8/47 (17.0%) patients. Four SSI patients were hospitalized and treated with intravenous antibiotics. The concentration of TGF-ß1 in wound exudate was significantly lower on POD#1 in the SSI group compared to the no SSI group (p=0.008). The receiving operator characteristics (ROC) curve for TGF-ß1 showed an area under curve of 0.773 (p=0.0149) indicating good diagnostic potential. On POD#6, the concentration of TGF-ß1 remained significantly lower (p=0.043) and the concentrations of IL-10 (p=0.000) and IL-1ß (0.004) significantly higher in the SSI group compared to the no SSI group. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study suggesting a predictive role of wound exudate TGF-ß1 levels for SSI. Our results suggest that the risk for SSI can be detected already on POD#1 and that the assessment of TGF-ß1 levels in the wound exudate after ALND can provide a usefull method for the early detection of SSI. The key findings of this pilot study warrant verification in a larger patient population.

Long-term Results of Microvascular Lymph Node Transfer: Correlation of Preoperative Factors and Operation Outcome.

Our objective was to analyze whether a correlation could be observed between preoperative factors and microvascular lymph node transfer outcome after long-term follow-up. METHODS: We included 67 patients in this retrospective case series. The incidence of cellulitis, the difference of arm circumference, the use of the compression garments both preoperatively and postoperatively, and subjective symptoms, such as pain, were analyzed. Volumetry and lymphoscintigraphy results were also analyzed in a subgroup of patients. We correlated preoperative factors with postoperative results. RESULTS: After 70 ± 17 months of follow-up, 42% of the patients were able to discontinue the use of compression garments. The subjective pain symptoms were reduced in 75% of the patients. The incidence of cellulitis was reduced from preoperative 0.20 ± 0.55/y to postoperative 0.02 ± 0.08/y. As a novel finding, the patients with preoperative cellulitis were more likely to continue the use of the compression garments. CONCLUSIONS: The surgery is beneficial to most studied lymphedema patients, although it is not the cure for all patients. The incidence of cellulitis was reduced, and further, the presence of preoperative cellulitis seems to affect the outcome of the operation.

Phase 1 LymfactinⓇ Study: Short-term Safety of Combined Adenoviral VEGF-C and Lymph Node Transfer Treatment for Upper Extremity Lymphedema.

OBJECTIVE: To study the safety and tolerability of LymfactinⓇ treatment combined with microvascular lymph node transfer surgery in patients with upper limb lymphedema. BACKGROUND: Upper limb lymphedema is a common clinical challenge after breast cancer surgery and/or radiotherapy. LymfactinⓇ is an adenovirus type 5-based gene therapy involving expression of human vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGF-C) in the damaged tissue. It aims to correct deficient lymphatic flow by promoting the growth and repair of lymphatic vessels. METHODS: In Phase I, LymfactinⓇ was combined with microvascular lymph node transfer surgery to study the safety and tolerability of LymfactinⓇ and the biodistribution of the viral vector in patients with upper limb lymphedema. RESULTS: Fifteen patients with breast cancer-associated secondary lymphedema of the upper arm were recruited between December 2016 and February 2018. Three patients received a lower dose (1 × 1010) and 12 a higher dose (1 × 1011) of viral particles, respectively. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed, and the study was completed with the pre-determined maximum dose. Commonly reported adverse events during the 12-month follow-up were common cold, fever, gastroenteritis, pain in the operation area, headache, muscle ache and elevated liver enzymes. Serious adverse events consisted of two erysipelas infections in the lymphedema arm (requiring hospitalization) and one hematoma of the flap donor site. CONCLUSIONS: After 12 months' follow-up, results indicate that LymfactinⓇ is well tolerated. The study continues with a 36-months efficacy and 5 years safety follow-up of the patients. The oncological safety aspects of LymfactinⓇ will require a longer follow-up period.

Combined Surgical Treatment for Chronic Upper Extremity Lymphedema Patients: Simultaneous Lymph Node Transfer and Liposuction.

BACKGROUND: Upper limb lymphedema is a common problem after axillary lymph node dissection. Lymphatic drainage can be improved by microvascular lymph node transfer, whereas liposuction can be used to reduce arm volume and excess of adipose tissue. We present the results of chronic lymphedema patients who have undergone lymph node transfer and liposuction simultaneously in 1 operation and compare the results with patients who have undergone lymph node transfer without liposuction. METHODS: During May 2007 to February 2015, 20 postmastectomy patients and 1 Hodgkin's lymphoma patient presenting with chronic nonpitting lymphedema (age between 37 and 74 years, average 56.7 years) were operated using the combined technique and 27 postmastectomy patients presenting with early-stage lymphedema (age between 31 and 68 years, average age 50.2 years) were operated using only the lymph node transfer. Compression therapy was started immediately after the operation and the patients used compression 24 h/d at least 6 months postoperatively. Changes in clinical parameters (number of erysipelas infections, pain), arm volume, transport indexes calculated form lymphoscintigraphy images, and daily usage of compression garments were compared preoperatively and postoperatively and between groups (combined technique vs lymph node transfer). The study was a retrospective observational study. RESULTS: In the combined technique group, the average arm volume excess decreased postoperatively 87.7%, and in 7 of 10 patients, the edema volume did not increase even without compression. Seventeen of 21 patients were able to reduce the use of compression garment. Lymphoscintigraphy results were improved in 12 of 15 patients and the improvement was significantly greater in the combined technique group than in the lymph node transfer group (P = 0.01). The number of erysipelas infections was decreased in 7 of 10 patients and the decrease was significantly greater in the combined technique group than in the lymph node transfer group (P = 0.02). In the lymph node transfer group, the average excess volume decreased postoperatively 27.5%. Fourteen of 27 patients were able to reduce the use of compression garments. Lymphoscintigraphy results were improved in 8 of 19 patients, and the number of erysipelas infections was decreased in 1 of 3 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Liposuction can safely be performed with lymph node transfer in 1 operation to achieve optimal results in patients with chronic lymphedema. The combined technique provides immediate volume reduction and further regenerative effects on the lymphatic circulation. The significantly greater reduction in lymphoscintigraphy values and erysipelas infections suggests that the combined technique might be better for late-stage lymphedema patients than lymph node transfer alone.

Anti-inflammatory effects of flap and lymph node transfer.

BACKGROUND: Transfer of healthy tissue is commonly used in the treatment of complicated wounds and in reconstruction of tissue defects. Recently, microvascular lymph node transfer (LN) has been used to improve the lymphatic function in lymphedema patients. To elucidate the biological effects of flap transfer (with and without lymph nodes), we have studied the postoperative production of proinflammatory, anti-inflammatory, prolymphangiogenic and antilymphangiogenic cytokines, and growth factors (interleukin 1α [IL-1α], IL-1ß, tumor necrosis factor α [TNF-α], IL-10, transforming growth factor ß1 [TGF-ß1], IL-4 and IL-13, and vascular endothelial growth factor C [VEGF-C] and VEGF-D) in postoperative wound exudate samples. METHODS: Axillary wound exudate samples were analyzed from four patient groups: axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), microvascular breast reconstruction (BR), LN, and combined LN and BR (LN-BR). RESULTS: The concentration of proinflammatory cytokines was low in all the flap transfer groups as opposed to the ALND group, which showed an extensive proinflammatory response. The level of anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic cytokine IL-10 was increased in the LN-BR group samples compared with the ALND and BR groups. In the LN and LN-BR groups, the cytokine profile showed an anti-inflammatory response. CONCLUSIONS: Transfer of healthy tissue hinders the proinflammatory response after surgery, which may explain the beneficial effects of flap transfer in various patient groups. In addition, flap transfer with lymph nodes seems to also promote an antifibrotic effect. The clinical effects of LN in lymphedema patients may be mediated by the increased production of prolymphangiogenic growth factor (VEGF-C) and antifibrotic cytokine (IL-10).

[Lymphedema]. / Lymfaturvotus.

Chronic swelling due to lymphatic insufficiency (lymphedema) is a common problem after surgical operations, radiation therapy, injuries and infections. Overweight is a new but rapidly increasing component of lymphedema. Treatment of lymphedema is based on compression therapy, lymph therapy and physiotherapy as well as various surgical treatment alternatives. Curative treatment has not been available. Over the last few years new imaging methods, surgical techniques and Finnish basic research have provided new tools for diagnostics and therapy.

Lymphatic vessel function and lymphatic growth factor secretion after microvascular lymph node transfer in lymphedema patients.

BACKGROUND: Recent reports have shown that microvascular lymph node transfer may improve lymphatic drainage in lymphedema patients. Lymphatic anastomoses are expected to form spontaneously in response to lymphatic growth factor [vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGF-C)] secreted by the transferred lymph nodes. METHODS: We have analyzed the results of 19 lymph node transfer patients operated on 2007-2012. Postoperat ive lymphatic function of the affected arm was evaluated using semiquantitative lymphoscintigraphy (transport index) and limb circumference measurements. To investigate the postoperative VEGF-C secretion, we examined axillary seroma fluid samples after different surgical operations, including lymph node transfer. RESULTS: The transport index was improved postoperatively in 7 of 19 patients. Ten of the 19 patients were able to reduce or even discontinue using compression garments. Arm circumferences were reduced in 12 of 19 patients. Six of the 7 patients with preoperative erysipelas infections have not had infectious episodes postoperatively during 15-67 months follow-up. Neuropathic pain was relieved in 5 of 5 patients. VEGF-C protein was detected in the axillary seroma fluid both after lymph node transfer and normal breast reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Reconstructing the lymphatic anatomy of the axilla with a lymph node flap may offer possibilities that other reconstructive options are lacking. However, we will need further reports and comparative studies about the clinical efficacy of this new promising technique. In addition to the transferred lymph nodes, lymphatic growth factor production may also be induced by other factors related to microvascular breast reconstruction.

Donor-site lymphatic function after microvascular lymph node transfer.

BACKGROUND: Lymphedema remains a challenging clinical problem that often lacks curative treatment options. Recent reports have shown that microvascular lymph node transfer from the groin area into axillas of lymphedematous patients may improve lymphatic drainage, but the effect on donor-site lymphatic flow has not been studied. These patients may be more prone to develop lymphedema at donor sites as well; therefore, the authors' aim was to evaluate postoperative donor-site lymphatic function. METHODS: The authors performed lymphatic groin flap transfer to the axilla in 13 lymphedema patients. In 10 patients, the lymph node transfer was performed simultaneously with lower abdominal breast reconstruction. Postoperative lymphatic vessel function of the donor site was evaluated by lymphoscintigraphy and limb circumference measurements. For semiquantitative evaluation of lymphatic drainage, a numerical transport index was used. RESULTS: In six of 10 patients, postoperative lymphoscintigraphy revealed minor changes in lymphatic flow of the donor-site limbs. The transport index was considered slightly abnormal in two of 10 patients. None of the 13 patients had changes in lower limb circumferences during the 8- to 56-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Lymph node transfer can be easily combined with lower abdominal breast reconstruction, and the popularity of this technique is increasing rapidly. Even though none of our patients had developed symptoms of postoperative lymphedema, the results of the first lymphoscintigrams show that it is important to reduce the surgical trauma to the lymphatic flap donor site. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Microvascular breast reconstruction and lymph node transfer for postmastectomy lymphedema patients.

OBJECTIVE: Postoperative lymphedema after breast cancer surgery is a challenging problem. Recently, a novel microvascular lymph node transfer technique provided a fresh hope for patients with lymphedema. We aimed to combine this new method with the standard breast reconstruction. METHODS: During 2008-2010, we performed free lower abdominal flap breast reconstruction in 87 patients. For all patients with lymphedema symptoms (n = 9), we used a modified lower abdominal reconstruction flap containing lymph nodes and lymphatic vessels surrounding the superficial circumflex vessel pedicle. Operation time, donor site morbidity, and postoperative recovery between the 2 groups (lymphedema breast reconstruction and breast reconstruction) were compared. The effect on the postoperative lymphatic vessel function was examined. RESULTS: The average operation time was 426 minutes in the lymphedema breast reconstruction group and 391 minutes in the breast reconstruction group. The postoperative abdominal seroma formation was increased in patients with lymphedema. Postoperative lymphoscintigraphy demonstrated at least some improvement in lymphatic vessel function in 5 of 6 patients with lymphedema. The upper limb perimeter decreased in 7 of 9 patients. Physiotherapy and compression was no longer needed in 3 of 9 patients. Importantly, we found that human lymph nodes express high levels of endogenous lymphatic vessel growth factors. Transfer of the lymph nodes and the resulting endogenous growth factor expression may thereby induce the regrowth of lymphatic network in the axilla. No edema problems were detected in the lymph node donor area. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous breast and lymphatic reconstruction is an ideal option for patients who suffer from lymphedema after mastectomy and axillary dissection.