Extending indications of micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy: It is not just about cracking stones.

OBJECTIVE: To describe our experience and results of using the MicroPerc™ micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy armamentarium (PolyDiagnost, Germany) for unusual indications unexplored using this modality. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used the MicroPerc™ system for stone clearance in three ureteric calculi, two bladder calculi, one case of urethral calculus, for antegrade biopsy in a case of upper tract urothelial carcinoma, for Deflux® (dextranomer/hyaluronic copolymer, Salix Pharmaceuticals, Uppsala, Sweden) injection in three cases of vesico-ureteric reflux (VUR), and three cases of posterior urethral valve (PUV) fulgurations. A 4.85-F 'All-Seeing Needle®' (PolyDiagnost) was used in most of the cases. An 8-F mini-micro sheath was used where stability was deemed necessary. Clinical data were collected in a dedicated database. Intraoperative variables, postoperative complications, and outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: All patients were successfully treated with complete stone clearance at 1 month with no residual fragments. The antegrade biopsy confirmed a high-grade papillary neoplasm. There were no technical difficulties with injection of Deflux or PUV fulgurations. Follow-up at 1 year revealed no stone recurrence, resolved reflux in all three cases, and all the children that had had PUVs were voiding well. The small sample and retrospective nature of the analysis are the limitations of this study. CONCLUSION: MicroPerc™, besides its usual use for minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy, can also be feasibly used for ureteric, bladder and urethral stones, and for treating non-calculus diseases such as PUVs and VUR. True to its name, it may be an 'All-Seeing Needle' in reality with much more to offer and harvest from.

Critical appraisal of consecutive 36 cases of post renal transplant lymphocele: a proposed algorithm.

INTRODUCTION: Lymphyocele by definition is the collection of lymph that is contained by a pseudomembrane. Management of lymphocele varies from simple aspiration or aspiration with sclerothreapy to more invasive technique, such as internal/external drainage. We present the results of 36 patients who developed pelvic lymphocele after renal transplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1720 patients underwent living related donor renal allograft transplant at our centre. Of the total 1720 transplants 36 patients developed symptomatic lymphocele and underwent definitive management. Retrospectively analysis of the clinical data of these 36 patients was done. RESULTS: Thrirt six patients (2.09%) had a clinically significant lymphocele, which needed definitive management. All these patients underwent ultrasound guided drain placement and sclerosant injection. Fifteen out of 36 patients (41.6%) had successful treament with percutaneous drain placement. Laparoscopic marsupialization of lymphocele was done in 21 patients who failed percutaneous drain insertion therapy after diagnostic aspiration. Laparoscopic Marsupilization was successful in 18 out of 21 patients (85.7%). The 3 patients with failed laparoscopic marsupialization were managed with open surgical marsupialization. CONCLUSION: Significant number of lymphocele post renal transplant may be asymptomatic but still cause deterioration of renal function even without causing obstructive uropathy. Lymphoceles causing renal deterioration or symptoms should be managed in a step ladder fashion starting from percutaneous drainage to laparoscopic marsupilization to open surgical approach. Asymptomatic recurrences post marsupialization are common and should be only closely observed unless they become symptomatic or cause deterioration of renal function. A systematic protocol may help in treating these patients better.

Case Report: Use of reinforced buccal mucosa graft over gracilis muscle flap in management of post high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) rectourethral fistula.

High intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) has come forward as alternative treatment for carcinoma of the prostate. Though minimally invasive,HIFUhas potential side effects. Urethrorectal fistula is one such rare side effect. Management of these fistulas has been described by Vanni et al. This case report describes points of technique that will help successful management of resilient rectourethral fistula. Urinary and faecal diversion in the form of suprapubic catheter and colostomy is vital. Adequate time between stoma formation, fistula closure and then finally stoma closure is needed. Lithotomy position and perineal approach gives best exposure to the fistula. The rectum should be dissected 2cm above the fistula; this aids in tension free closure of the rectal defect. Similarly buccal mucosal graft was used on the urethra to achieve tension free closure. A good vascular pedicle gracilis muscle flap is used to interpose between the two repairs. This not only provides a physical barrier but also provides a vascular bed for BMG uptake. Perfect haemostasis is essential, as any collection may become a site of infection thus compromising results.  We strongly recommend rectourethral fistula be directly repaired with gracilis muscle flap with reinforced buccal mucosa graft without attempting any less invasive repairs because the "first chance is the best chance".

Outcomes in a large series of minipercs: analysis of consecutive 318 patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of miniperc at our center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective review of consecutive 318 minipercs done in a single tertiary urological center. The Miniperc system used was either Wolf (Richard Wolf) 14F with 20F Amplaz sheath or Storz (Karl Storz) nephroscope 12F with 15/18F sheath or 16.5/19.5F sheath. Data about the demography of patients, comorbidities, stone size, number and size of the tract, size of nephroscope, energy source used, total operative time, exit strategy, hospital stay, clearance of stones, total analgesic requirement, visual analogue pain score at 6 and 24 hours, hemoglobin drop and complications were analyzed by the chi-square test and analysis of variance test. RESULTS: The average age of patients, stone size, operative time, hemoglobin drop and hospital stay were 41.9±17.0 years, 15.26±6.35 mm, 60±19 minutes,1.0±0.6 g/dL and 2.8±1 day, respectively. Complete clearance rate was 98.7%. Fourteen (4.4%) patients had Clavien-Dindo level 1 complications and 1 (0.31%) patient had Clavien-Dindo level 2 complications. The size of the stone treated by miniperc did not affect the hemoglobin drop (p-value=0.26) or hospital stay (p-value=0.924). There is no significant increase in hemoglobin drop (p-value=0.064) or hospital stay (p-value=0.627) with increasing number of miniperc tracts. An increase in operative time is associated with the increase in hemoglobin drop (p-value=0.041). Different energy sources did not significantly affect the operative time (p-value=0.184). Placement of only ureteral catheter is associated with less analgesic requirement (p-value=0.000). CONCLUSIONS: Miniperc is a safe alternative to standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy. In carefully selected patients, the best exit strategy would be a tubeless procedure with ureteral catheter drainage.

Sterilization of endoscopic instruments.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Sterilization of endoscopic instruments is an important but often ignored topic. The purpose of this article is to review the current literature on the sterilization of endoscopic instruments and elaborate on the appropriate sterilization practices. RECENT FINDING: Autoclaving is an economic and excellent method of sterilizing the instruments that are not heat sensitive. Heat sensitive instruments may get damaged with hot sterilization methods. Several new endoscopic instruments such as flexible ureteroscopes, chip on tip endoscopes, are added in urologists armamentarium. Many of these instruments are heat sensitive and hence alternative efficacious methods of sterilization are necessary. Although ethylene oxide and hydrogen peroxide are excellent methods of sterilization, they have some drawbacks. Gamma irradiation is mainly for disposable items. Various chemical agents are widely used even though they achieve high-level disinfection rather than sterilization. This article reviews various methods of endoscopic instrument sterilization with their advantages and drawbacks. SUMMARY: If appropriate sterilization methods are adopted, then it not only will protect patients from procedure-related infections but prevent hypersensitive allergic reactions. It will also protect instruments from damage and increase its longevity.