Randomized clinical trial of preoperative dexamethasone on postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopy for suspected appendicitis.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated the effects of preoperative dexamethasone in acute surgical patients. This study examined the effects of 8 mg dexamethasone administered intravenously 30 min before surgery for suspected acute appendicitis. METHODS: A multicentre, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted at two university hospitals in Denmark. Adults undergoing laparoscopic surgery for suspected appendicitis were eligible for inclusion. Participants, healthcare staff and investigators were blinded until all data analysis had been done. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) during the first postoperative day. Secondary outcomes were pain, fatigue, sleep, opioid consumption, use of antiemetics, quality of recovery and duration of convalescence. Analysis was done according to the intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients were enrolled; 57 patients in the dexamethasone group and 59 in the placebo group were eligible for primary analysis. In the dexamethasone group, 47 (95 per cent c.i. 35 to 60) per cent of patients experienced PONV compared with 63 (50 to 74) per cent) in the placebo group. The absolute risk reduction in PONV was 15 (-3 to 33) per cent in favour of the dexamethasone group (P = 0·098). Patients in the dexamethasone group had less pain at rest (difference in score on visual analogue scale (VAS) 9 (95 per cent c.i. 1 to 17) mm; P = 0·024), were less fatigued (difference in VAS score 7 (0 to 14) mm; P = 0·038), used fewer opioids (absolute risk reduction 17 (2 to 33) per cent; P = 0·033) and had better quality of recovery (difference in QoR-15 score 13 (4 to 22); P = 0·006) during the first postoperative day. There was no difference in postoperative complications (P = 0·595). CONCLUSION: Preoperative dexamethasone did not reduce PONV by the target level of 50 per cent. Registration number: NCT02415335 ( http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Translation and validation of the Danish version of the postoperative quality of recovery score QoR-15.

BACKGROUND: Patient perceived quality of recovery is an important outcome after surgery and should be measured in clinical trials. Quality of recovery after surgery and general anaesthesia can be measured by the QoR-15. A high score indicates a good recovery and the score ranges from 0 to 150. The aim of this study was to translate the QoR-15 questionnaire into Danish and do a full psychometric evaluation of the Danish version. METHODS: A translation and cultural adaption of the original version of the QoR-15 into a Danish version, the QoR-15D, was performed. After obtaining consent, patients undergoing elective abdominal, orthopaedic or gynaecological surgery under general anaesthesia were included. Patients completed the QoR-15D before surgery and on the first postoperative day. The validity, reliability, responsiveness and clinical feasibility of the QoR-15D were evaluated. RESULTS: One hundred and forty patients returned their pre- and postoperative questionnaire successfully giving a completion rate of 56%. The postoperative QoR-15 score was negatively correlated with duration of surgery (ρ = -0.21, 95% CI: -0.04 to -0.36, P < 0.02) and postoperative stay (ρ = -0.28, 95% CI: -0.12 to -0.43, P < 0.01). Postoperative QoR-15D scores were inversely related to the extent of surgery: minor, intermediate or major (127 ± 22, 106 ± 29 and 96 ± 24, respectively, P < 0.01). Cronbach's alpha and split-half reliability was 0.90 and 0.88. Test-retest reliability was 0.99 (95% CI: 0.94-1.00). Cohen's effect size was 1.13 and the standardized response mean was 0.82. CONCLUSION: The QoR-15D has preserved the validity, excellent reliability, high degree of responsiveness and the clinical feasibility of the original English version.

Can the quality of colonic surgery be improved by standardization of surgical technique with complete mesocolic excision?

AIM: we analysed the influence of standardization of colon cancer surgery with complete mesocolic excision (CME) on the quality of surgery measured by the pathological end-points of number of harvested lymph nodes, high tie of supplying vessels, plane of mesocolic resection and rate of R0 resection. METHOD: One hundred and ninety-eight patients with colonic carcinoma who underwent radical surgery between September 2007 and February 2009 were divided into two groups, including those undergoing surgery before (93) or after (105) 1 June 2008, when complete mesocolic excision (CME) was introduced as standard in our hospital. RESULTS: The overall mean high tie increased from 7.1 (CI, 6.5-7.6) to 9.6 (8.9-10.3) cm (P<0.0001) and the mean number of harvested lymph nodes from 24.5 (22.8-26.2) to 26.7 (24.6-28.8) (P=0.0095). There were no significant increases in these end-points in open right hemicolectomy, and in laparoscopic sigmoid resection the number of lymph nodes did not increase significantly. The plane of mesocolic resection, the rate of R0 resection and the risk of complications did not change significantly. The median (range) length of hospital stay increased from 4 (2-62) to 5 (2-71) days (P=0.04). CONCLUSION: Standardization of colonic cancer surgery with CME seems to improve the quality of surgery without increasing the risk of complications.

Intraluminal papaverine with pH 3 doubles blood flow in the internal mammary artery.

Seventy-five patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting were randomized to receive injections of papaverine solution or isotonic saline or no injection into the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) used as graft. Blood flow in the LIMA was measured twice-after dissection of the pedicle and before anastomosis to the coronary artery. Blood flow increased significantly in all three groups, but after papaverine injection it was twice as high as in the control groups, increasing by 285% (from 40 +/- 12 to 154 +/- 32 ml/min, p = < 0.0001). The pH of the papaverine solution was only 3, and we advise that surgeons check and correct pH in the papaverine solutions they use, in order to avoid endothelial damage to the LIMA. Based on these results we can recommend papaverine injection into the arterial graft only if the initial flow is low.

[Cardiac revascularization using both mammary arteries]. / Revaskularisering af hjertet med begge aa. mammariae.

Both internal mammary arteries in combination with veins were used for revascularization of the hearth in fifty Danish patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) at Gentofte Hospital during the period 1994-1996. Patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, obesity, and age over 75 years were excluded. The patients were followed for at least one month after the operation. No patients died, and the complication rate was low and comparable to standard CABG using the left mammary artery and vein grafts. It is known from the literature that 10 years after CABG only 50% of vein grafts remain patent, and half of these have severe atherosclerosis. The mammary artery is far more resistant to atherosclerosis and 15 years after the procedure fewer patients have recurrent angina when both mammary arteries have been used. Bilateral mammary artery grafts can be used in half of CABG-procedures, and are especially indicated in younger patients.