[Delayed diagnosis of osteosarcoma in adults: a prognostic factor to be considered]. / Retraso en el diagnóstico de osteosarcoma en adultos: un factor pronóstico que debemos considerar.

INTRODUCTION: different variables have been associated with a worse prognosis of patients with osteosarcoma (OS), highlighting tumor size, location in the axial skeleton and the presence of metastases. The objective of this study is to analyze the prognostic impact of diagnostic delay in osteosarcoma in adults in the Mexican population in a center specialized in sarcomas. MATERIAL AND METHODS: retrospective cohort study from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2016, 96 patients over 21 years of age with a diagnosis of osteosarcoma were analyzed. RESULTS: the median time to diagnosis from the onset of symptoms was six months (range: 2-36). This variable was dichotomized by applying the operator-dependent curve (ROC) analysis and we determined a cut-off value greater than five months, with an area under the curve (AUC) = 0.93 [95% CI 0.86-0.97], sensitivity 93.2% and specificity 94.6%. CONCLUSION: time until diagnosis is a critical factor in the survival of adult patients with osteosarcoma, highlighting its influence on disease progression and the appearance of metastasis. The correlation between diagnostic delay and an unfavorable prognosis reinforces the need for rapid and efficient evaluation in suspected cases of osteosarcoma.

INTRODUCCIÓN: diferentes variables se han asociado con un peor pronóstico de los pacientes con osteosarcoma, destacando el tamaño tumoral, la localización en esqueleto axial y la presencia de metástasis. El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar el impacto pronóstico del retraso diagnóstico en osteosarcoma en adultos en población mexicana en un centro especializado en sarcomas. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: estudio de tipo cohorte retrospectiva del 1 de Enero del 2005 al 31 de Diciembre de 2016, se analizaron 96 pacientes mayores de 21 años con diagnóstico de osteosarcoma. RESULTADOS: la mediana de tiempo al diagnóstico desde el inicio de síntomas fue de seis meses (rango: 2-36). Esta variable se dicotomizó aplicando el análisis de curva dependiente de operador (ROC) y determinamos un valor de corte mayor a cinco meses con un área bajo la curva (AUC) = 0.93 [IC95% 0.86-0.97], sensibilidad 93.2% y especificidad 94.6%. CONCLUSIÓN: el tiempo hasta el diagnóstico es un factor crítico en la supervivencia de los pacientes adultos con osteosarcoma, destacando su influencia en la progresión de la enfermedad y la aparición de metástasis. La correlación entre el retraso diagnóstico y un pronóstico desfavorable refuerza la necesidad de una evaluación rápida y eficiente en casos sospechosos de osteosarcoma.

[Prognostic factors associated with failure of modular knee arthroplasty in oncologic patients]. / Factores pronósticos asociados al fracaso de la artroplastía modular de rodilla en pacientes oncológicos.

INTRODUCTION: reconstruction of large bone defects using modular knee arthroplasty (MKA) presents a significant challenge in terms of functionality. The objective of the present work was to identify the different prognostic factors associated with failure of MKA in cancer patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: a retrospective cohort study was conducted, including patients with a diagnosis of musculoskeletal tumor in the distal femur or proximal tibia, who underwent MKA between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2021. RESULTS: 49 patients were included, of which 25 (51.02%) were women and 24 (48.98%) men, with a mean age of 29.57 years. Of these, 14 (28.57%) patients experienced some type of MKA failure. The most frequent complication that led to failure was periprosthetic infection, observed in seven (14.29%) patients. Variables associated with MKA failure included biopsies performed outside our hospital (HR 3.2, 95% CI 1.4-6.4, p = 0.02), the length of the long axis of the tumor (HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.2-4.6, p = 0.01) and a prolonged surgical time (HR 3.37, 95% CI 1.1-8.6, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: the most significant prognostic factors associated with MKA failure in our cohort were tumor size, prolonged surgical time, and performance of the diagnostic biopsy in a center not specialized in the management of this type of patient. These findings highlight the importance of considering these variables to improve outcomes in patients undergoing MKA.

INTRODUCCIÓN: la reconstrucción de grandes defectos óseos mediante artroplastía modular de rodilla (AMR) representa un desafío significativo en términos de funcionalidad. El objetivo del presente trabajo fue identificar los diferentes factores pronósticos asociados al fracaso de la AMR en pacientes oncológicos. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: se realizó un estudio de cohorte retrospectiva, incluyendo pacientes con diagnóstico de tumor musculoesquelético en el fémur distal o la tibia proximal, que fueron sometidos a AMR entre el 1 de Enero de 2010 y el 31 de Diciembre de 2021. RESULTADOS: se incluyeron 49 pacientes, de los cuales 25 (51.02%) eran mujeres y 24 (48.98%) hombres, con una edad media de 29.57 años. De éstos, 14 (28.57%) pacientes experimentaron algún tipo de fracaso de la AMR. La complicación más frecuente que condicionó el fracaso fue la infección periprotésica, observada en siete (14.29%) pacientes. Las variables asociadas con el fracaso de las AMR incluyeron biopsias realizadas fuera de nuestro hospital (HR 3.2, IC95% 1.4-6.4, p = 0.02), longitud del eje mayor del tumor (HR 2.1, IC95% 1.2-4.6, p = 0.01) y tiempo quirúrgico prolongado (HR 3.37, IC95% 1.1-8.6, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIÓN: los factores pronósticos asociados al fracaso de las AMR en nuestra cohorte fueron el tamaño del tumor, un tiempo quirúrgico prolongado y la realización de la biopsia diagnóstica en un centro no especializado en el manejo de este tipo de pacientes. Estos hallazgos resaltan la importancia de considerar estas variables en pacientes sometidos a AMR.

Comparative study between two different staging systems (AJCC TNM VS BALLANTYNE'S) for mucosal melanomas of the Head & Neck.

BACKGROUND: Mucosal melanoma (MM) of head and neck (H&N) is a rare entity with a quite poor prognosis. Ballantyne's staging system has been commonly used since 1970. In the 7th edition of the AJCC Staging Manual a new chapter for the staging of TNM Classification system for mucosal melanoma (MM) of the head and neck (H&N) has been introduced to reflect the particularly aggressive biological behavior of this neoplasm. The aim of this study was to analyze and compare among Ballantyne's staging system vs TNM H&N in terms of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in a consecutive population of patients with MM in a cancer centre. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Descriptive analysis of demographic, clinical and pathological variables of MM of the Head & Neck were performed. We compared the survival curves for both systems according to the Kaplan-Meier method using the Log-rank test. RESULTS: An up-staging migration effect from Ballantyne's localized disease to moderate-ly and very advanced disease according to AJCC staging system. The 5-year DFS and OS for Ballantyne's Localized Disease and AJCC Stage III were 31% and 36% vs. 47% and 50%, respectively. For locoregional disease the 5-year DFS / OS were 5% / 10% for Ballantyne's system vs. 13.8% / 17.8% and 0 / 0% for AJCC Stages IVA and IVB, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this series, the TNM staging system for MM of the H&N predicted the prognosis of the disease when comparing with Ballantyne's system.

Induction chemotherapy followed by supracricoid partial laryngectomy (SCPL) with cricohyoidoepiglottopexy (CHEP) in T3NO arytenoid fixation-related glottic cancer.

Induction chemotherapy followed by supracricoid partial laryngectomy (SCPL) with cricohyoidoepiglottopexy (CHEF) in T3NO arytenoid fixation-related glottic cancer. OBJECTIVE: Arytenoid fixation in the larynx has been considered a contraindication for performing organ preservation surgery (OPS). We present a retrospective series of cases of arytenoid fixation-related T3N0 glottic cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by OPS. MATERIAL: Retrospective review of 19 patients (from 2008 to 2012) with T3NO glottic cancer who received two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a combination of paclitaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluoruracil (PPF), with a 21-day interval between each cycle, followed by supracricoid partial laryngectomy (SCPL) with cricohyoidoepiglottopexy (CHEP). RESULTS: Sixteen patients with a mean age of 56.4 years received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a clinical response (7 partial response/9 complete response) and radiologic response by computed tomography (CT) (7 partial response/7 complete response/2 cases without CT) were treated with SCPL-CHEP and removal of the arytenoid cartilage in the tumour site (10 left/6 right), bilateral neck dissection of levels II to V and searching of the Delphian node. There was one patient who died after a recurrence in the larynx and who also had an additional concomitant second primary tumour, and a second patient with a second primary tumour in the lung, who is still alive after treatment. Disease-free survival (DFS) was 82.5% at 5 years and overall survival (OS) was 80% at 5 years. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy proved beneficial in patients waiting for surgery, helped maximize the oncologic benefit of the surgery provided (good local control using SCPL with CHEP), improved regional and distant control, minimized side effects by avoiding treatment with radiotherapy whenever possible, and proved feasible even in the presence of ipsilateral arytenoid fixation. Our results are encouraging, although a multi-centre randomized clinical trial should be performed in order to identify the true impact of this approach.

Craniofacial resection for sinunasal tumors.

INTRODUCTION: Malignant sinonasal tumors are very rare in Mexico. They ussually present as advanced disease because it is extremely difficult to make an early diagnosis; in addition, its treatment is complicated by a variety of lesions. Surgical resection remains the mainstay of treatment, but its relative therapeutic value compared with alternative treatments is controversial. OBJECTIVE: We undertook a retrospective analysis in order to evaluate results of craniofacial resections for sinonasal tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 20 patients, 11 men and 9 women were considered, median age was 49 years (18-74). Eleven had received previous treatment elsewhere. In 13 patients tumor was limited to maxillo-ethmoid complex, but in 6 cases tumor involved anteroinferior aspect of sphenoid sinus, in 7 extended to the orbit, in 3 to dura and two to the brain. One had cervical metastases. Median tumoral size was 5.8 cm (1-10). RESULTS: Overall complication rate was 50%. Major surgical complications occurred in 4 patients (20%): one patient developed isolated cerebrospinal fluid leakage (CEFL), 1 developed deterioration of mental status, and two developed meningitis associated with CEFL. Late complications occurred in 30% of the patients. There was not any operative death. Eleven patients received postoperative radiotherapy. Fifteen patients recurred. There were 11 local relapses, although one associated with a regional relapse, and another with regional and distant relapse. There were four isolated regional fails and six isolated distant failures. Three year overall survival was 65%, and 3-year disease free survival was 50%. Patients without previous treatment median survival was 28.3 months, meanwhile with previous treatment was 18.2 months. CONCLUSIONS: Craniofacial resection is a safe and valuable tool in the treatment of advanced sinonasal tumors involving cranial base.