Persistence of monocyte activation under treatment in people followed since acute HIV-1 infection relative to participants at high or low risk of HIV infection.

BACKGROUND: Interpretation of the increase in certain inflammatory markers in virally suppressed HIV-infected individuals must rely on an appropriate uninfected control group well characterized for non-HIV-related factors that contribute to chronic inflammation, e.g. smoking, alcohol consumption, or being overweight. We compared the inflammatory profiles of HIV-infected participants under long-term antiretroviral therapy (ART) with those of two HIV-uninfected groups with contrasting health behaviours. METHODS: We studied 150 HIV-infected participants (42 women, 108 men) under long-term ART (median, 6 years) followed in the ANRS PRIMO cohort since acute/early HIV-1 infection (AHI) diagnosis. Sex and age-matched controls were sampled from i) the ANRS IPERGAY pre-exposure prophylaxis trial among men at high risk for HIV infection and with high frequencies of non-HIV factors of inflammation ii) the ANRS COHVAC cohort of volunteers in vaccine trials with a low-risk profile for HIV infection. We measured the plasma levels of ten inflammatory markers. FINDINGS: After adjusting for smoking, alcohol use and body mass index, both HIV-infected men and women had higher levels of sCD14, sCD163, sTNFRII and I-FABP than their high-risk IPERGAY and low-risk COHVAC counterparts. Hierarchical clustering showed a subset of 15 PRIMO participants to have an inflammatory profile similar to that of most HIV-negative participants. These participants already had favourable markers at AHI diagnosis. INTERPRETATION: Long-term ART, even when initiated at a low level of immunodeficiency, fails to normalize monocyte/macrophage activation and gut epithelial dysfunction. Persistent inflammation under treatment may be related to an increased inflammatory profile since AHI. FUNDING: ANRS and Paris-Saclay University.

HIV Infection in North African Patients.

North Africa is one of the rare regions where the HIV epidemic is growing. In France, 5% of the migrants discovering their HIV infection are from North Africa. The objective of this study was to compare the sociodemographic characteristics and outcomes of North African and French HIV-infected patients. This study was conducted in the HIV clinic of Bichat Hospital (Paris, France). The North African HIV-infected patients were born in Algeria, Tunisia, or Morocco or had lived there for more than 6 months. They were matched for age and gender (1:2) to patients born in France who had never lived outside France for more than 6 months. Sociodemographic, clinical, and immunovirological characteristics of North African and French patients were compared using conditional logistic regression. Among 4,738 eligible patients, 285 North Africans were identified. CD4 levels at HIV diagnosis were not significantly different between North African and French patients, but were more frequently <200/mm3 in the former than the latter at treatment initiation (p = .02). CDC stage 3 disease occurred more frequently in the first 3 years of care in our center in North African patients than in French patients (p = .01), and control of the HIV viral load over the 12 months preceding inclusion was better in French patients (p = .0001). There was no difference regarding loss to care. These results highlight possible issues in adherence to antiretroviral treatment in North African patients, which may be related to differences in the acceptability of the disease.