Imipramine and olanzapine block apoE4-catalyzed polymerization of Aß and show evidence of improving Alzheimer's disease cognition.

BACKGROUND: The apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 allele confers the strongest risk for late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) besides age itself, but the mechanisms underlying this risk are debated. One hypothesis supported by evidence from multiple labs is that apoE4 binds to the amyloid-ß (Aß) peptide and catalyzes its polymerization into neurotoxic oligomers and fibrils. Inhibiting this early step in the amyloid cascade may thereby reduce or prevent neurodegeneration and AD. METHODS: Using a design of experiments (DOE) approach, we developed a high-throughput assay to identify inhibitors of apoE4-catalyzed polymerization of Aß into oligomers and fibrils. We used it to screen the NIH Clinical Collection of small molecule drugs tested previously in human clinical trials. We then evaluated the efficacy and cytotoxicity of the hit compounds in primary neuron models of apoE4-induced Aß and phosphorylated tau aggregation. Finally, we performed retrospective analyses of the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) clinical dataset, using Cox regression and Cox proportional hazards models to determine if the use of two FDA-approved hit compounds was associated with better cognitive scores (Mini-Mental State Exam), or improved AD clinical diagnosis, when compared with other medications of the same clinical indication. RESULTS: Our high-throughput screen identified eight blood-brain barrier (BBB)-permeable hit compounds that reduced apoE4-catalyzed Aß oligomer and fibril formation in a dose-dependent manner. Five hit compounds were non-toxic toward cultured neurons and also reduced apoE4-promoted Aß and tau neuropathology in a dose-dependent manner. Three of the five compounds were determined to be specific inhibitors of apoE4, whereas the other two compounds were Aß or tau aggregation inhibitors. When prescribed to AD patients for their normal clinical indications, two of the apoE4 inhibitors, imipramine and olanzapine, but not other (non-hit) antipsychotic or antidepressant medications, were associated with improvements in cognition and clinical diagnosis, especially among APOE4 carriers. CONCLUSIONS: The critical test of any proposed AD mechanism is whether it leads to effective treatments. Our high-throughput screen identified two promising FDA-approved drugs, imipramine and olanzapine, which have no structural, functional, or clinical similarities other than their shared ability to inhibit apoE4-catalyzed Aß polymerization, thus identifying this mechanism as an essential contribution of apoE4 to AD.

Effect of age at treatment on cognitive performance in patients with cystinosis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether early treatment with cysteamine affects cognitive functioning in patients with nephropathic cystinosis. STUDY DESIGN: Forty-six subjects aged 3-18 years with cystinosis underwent cognitive testing to determine intelligence, visual-spatial abilities, and visual-motor skills. An age-matched control group (n = 85; age 2-22 years) underwent the same tests. Age at diagnosis and age at initiation of treatment with cysteamine were recorded at the time of testing. RESULTS: Patients with cystinosis treated at or after age 2 years (late-treatment group) scored significantly lower on verbal, performance, and full-scale IQ measures, as well as on a test of visual-spatial skills, compared with patients treated before age 2 years (early-treatment group) and controls. Both groups of subjects with cystinosis demonstrated impaired visual-motor skills compared with controls, with no difference between the early-treatment and late-treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Early treatment with cysteamine appears to improve intellectual function in patients with nephropathic cystinosis. However, the lack of improvement in visual-motor function with early cysteamine treatment suggests possibly different mechanisms underlying visual-motor performance compared with other areas of cognition in this disorder.