2-pentadecyl-2-oxazoline prevents cognitive and social behaviour impairments in the Amyloid ß-induced Alzheimer-like mice model: Bring the α2 adrenergic receptor back into play.

The 2-pentadecyl-2-oxazoline (PEA-OXA) is a natural compound with protective action in neuro-inflammation. We have previously shown that PEA-OXA behaves as an α2 adrenergic receptor (α2AR) antagonist and a putative protean agonist on histamine H3 receptors. Recently, neuroinflammation and monoaminergic neurotransmission dysfunction has drawn particular attention in Alzheimer Disease (AD) pathophysiology. In this context, the objective of this study was to investigate the effects of the dual-acting PEA-OXA in an AD-like model in mice. A combined computational and experimental approach was used to evaluate the ability of PEA-OXA to bind α2A-AR subtype, and to investigate the effects of PEA-OXA treatment on neuropathological (behavioural and functional) effects induced by soluble Amyloid ß 1-42 (sAß1-42) intracerebroventricular injection. Computational analysis revealed the PEA-OXA ability to bind the α2A-AR, a pharmacological target for AD, in two alternative poses, one overlapping the Na+ binding site. In vivo studies indicated that chronic treatment with PEA-OXA (10 mg/kg, os) restored the cognitive (discriminative and spatial memory) deficits and social impairments induced by sAß injection. Consistently, electrophysiological analysis showed a recovery of the long-term potentiation in the hippocampus (Lateral Entorhinal Cortex-Dentate Gyrus pathway), while neuroinflammation, i.e., increased pro-inflammatory cytokines levels and microglia cells density were reduced. These data provide the basis for further investigation of the pro-cognitive aptitude of PEA-OXA by proposing it as an adjuvant in the treatment in AD, for which the available pharmacological approaches remain unsatisfactory. Moreover, this study offers new future direction in research investigating the role of α2AR in neuropsychiatric illness and therapies.

Impact of previous corticosteroid exposure on outcomes of patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppressive dosing of corticosteroids at the start of treatment impairs immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) efficacy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Previous cumulative dose and intake modality of corticosteroids may result in different levels of immunosuppression. We sought to determine whether these aspects could predict disease control and survival in NSCLC patients receiving ICIs. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single-center study, including patients treated with ICI as second-line therapy at our institution between July 2015 and February 2021. A prednisone equivalent threshold of 700 mg defined low (LCD) or high (HCD) cumulative dosing during the 90 days before starting ICIs. At least one 5-day course of ≥ 10 mg prednisone equivalent determined whether the intake was pulse (PCD, ≤ 5 days) or continuous (CCD, > 5 days). RESULTS: We included 113 consecutive patients. Durable control benefit and no clinical benefit (NCB) were reported in 53 (47%) and 60 (53%) of the cases, respectively. ECOG PS 1-2, negative PD-L1 expression, HCD, and CCD were significantly related to NCB in multivariate analysis. The median PFS was 4.6 months (95%CI: 3.9-6.3) and median OS was 6.9 months (95% CI: 6.0-8.9) after a median follow-up time of 43.5 months (95% CI: 32.6-54.4). Multivariate analysis of survival confirmed ECOG PS 1-2 (p = 0.005), negative PD-L1 expression (p = 0.002), and CCD (p = 0.001) significantly correlated with an increased risk of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: These findings imply that immunosuppressive corticosteroid dosing before ICIs, even of short duration, might affect survival. The constraints of this study and lack of reliable comparisons suggest a hypothesis-generating value of these results.

Antineoplastic treatment class modulates COVID-19 mRNA-BNT162b2 vaccine immunogenicity in cancer patients: a secondary analysis of the prospective Vax-On study.

BACKGROUND: Preliminary analysis from the Vax-On study did not find a correlation between cancer treatment type and antibody response to COVID-19 vaccination. We carried out a secondary subgroup analysis to verify the effects of comprehensive cancer treatment classification on vaccine immunogenicity. METHODS: The Vax-On study prospectively enrolled patients who started a two-dose messenger RNA-BNT162b2 vaccine schedule from 9 March 2021 to 12 April 2021 (timepoint-1). Those on active treatment within the previous 28 days accounted for the exposed cases. Patients who had discontinued such treatment by at least 28 days or received intravesical therapy represented the control cases. Quantification of immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies against the receptor binding domain of the S1 subunit of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein was carried out before the second dose (timepoint-2) and 8 weeks thereafter (timepoint-3). Seroconversion response was defined at ≥50 arbitrary units/ml IgG titer. Classification of antineoplastic agents was based on their pharmacodynamic properties. RESULTS: Three hundred and sixty-six patients were enrolled (86 and 260 as control and exposed cases, respectively). Univariate analysis revealed a significantly lower IgG titer after both doses of vaccine in subgroups treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), multiple cytotoxic agents, alkylating agents, and topoisomerase inhibitors. At timepoint-3, seroconversion response was significantly impaired in the topoisomerase inhibitors and mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors subgroups. After multivariate testing, treatment with alkylating agents and TKIs was significantly associated with a reduced change in IgG titer at timepoint-2. Treatment with mTOR inhibitors resulted in a similar interaction at each timepoint. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor treatment was independently correlated with an incremental variation in IgG titer at timepoint-3. Specific subgroups (TKIs, antimetabolites, alkylating agents, and multiple-agent chemotherapy) predicted lack of seroconversion at timepoint-2, but their effect was not retained at timepoint-3. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 2, immunosuppressive corticosteroid dosing, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use were independently linked to lower IgG titer after either dose of vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: Drugs interfering with DNA synthesis, multiple-agent cytotoxic chemotherapy, TKIs, mTOR and cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors differentially modulate humoral response to messenger RNA-BNT162b2 vaccine.