Study for the quality assessment of abstracts presented to Italian public health national conferences: a six years survey.

BACKGROUND: Oral and poster presentations at congresses are essential to spread scientific knowledge among the medical community. Many scientific societies have analyzed the quality of papers presented at their meetings but no information on abstracts' evaluation has been presented in Public Health field. DESIGN AND METHODS: This study aims to examine the quality of abstracts presented at annual meetings of Italian Public Health Society (SItI) in the period 2005-2010 through a validated checklist grid, evaluating eight dimensions: Inherency, Structure, Originality, Objectives, Study design, Sources, Results, Conclusions. Each item was scored from 0 to 3 points (max score: 24) and we used the average score in our study (15) as threshold of good quality. A multivariate analysis was performed in order to investigate predictors of score of abstracts presented. RESULTS: A total of 4,399 abstracts (1,172 oral communications, 3,227 posters) was examined. Around 60% were submitted by Universities and around 40% were from Central Italy. The highest quality was found in the fields of Vaccines (average score 18.9), Infectious Diseases (18) and in abstracts submitted by Universities (16.4). Predictors of lower quality identified were geographical area and affiliation (p= 0.002). Abstracts containing well-written Results, Conclusions and Objectives (3 points) were more likely to be of high quality(OR=55.6, OR=41.9, and OR=157.4; p>0.001) CONCLUSIONS: This is the first European study evaluating the quality of abstracts in the public health field. A reliable evaluation tool is fundamental to offer a transparent methodology of assessment and to improve the quality of research.

Detecting impaired glucose tolerance or type 2 diabetes mellitus by means of an oral glucose tolerance test in HIV-infected patients.

OBJECTIVE: As a proactive diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (DM) may prevent the onset of severe complications, we used an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) to check for impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and DM in patients with long-standing HIV infection and long durations of exposure to antiretroviral drugs with normal fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, single-centre study. The homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and 2-h post-load glucose levels were used to evaluate patients with known HIV-1 infection since before 1988 and no previous diagnosis of DM for whom data on hepatitis C virus (HCV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection were available. RESULTS: Eighty-four Caucasian patients [67 (80%) male; median age 45.7 years; range 43.8-49.1 years] were able to be evaluated; 65 (77%) were coinfected with HCV, and seven (8%) were coinfected with HBV. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) exposure to antiretrovirals was 12.8 (10.4-16.5) years. Fifteen patients (18%) had a previous AIDS-defining event, 64 (76%) had HIV RNA<50 copies/mL, and the median (IQR) CD4 count was 502 (327-628) cells/µL. The median [IQR] FPG was 81 mg/dL (4.5 mmol/L) [75-87 mg/dL (4.2-4.8 mmol/L)], and the median (IQR) HOMA-IR was 2.82 (1.89-4.02). After OGTT, nine patients (11%) were diagnosed as having IGT (6) or DM (3). A first multivariable analysis showed that CD4 cell count (P=0.038) and HOMA-IR (P=0.035) were associated with IGT or DM, but a second model including only the variables with a P-value of <0.2 in the univariable analysis (CD4 cell count, HBV coinfection, and HOMA-IR) found that only HOMA-IR independently predicted IGT or DM. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with long-standing HIV infection and normal FPG levels, an OGTT can reveal IGT or DM.

Development and implementation of a science training course for breast cancer activists: Project LEAD (leadership, education and advocacy development).

OBJECTIVE: To develop and implement Project LEAD (leadership, education, and advocacy development), a science course for breast cancer activists. POPULATION: Students were breast cancer activists and other consumers, mainly affiliated with advocacy organizations in the United States of America. SETTING: Project LEAD is offered by the National Breast Cancer Coalition; the course takes place over 5 days and is offered 4 times a year, in various cities in the United States of America. RESULTS: The Project LEAD curriculum has developed over 5 years to include lectures, problem-based study groups, case studies, interactive critical appraisal sessions, a seminar by an 'expert' scientist, role play, and homework components. A core faculty has been valuable for evaluating and revising the course and has proved necessary to provide consistent high quality teaching. Course evaluations indicated that students gained critical appraisal skills, enhanced their knowledge and developed confidence in selected areas of basic science and epidemiology. CONCLUSIONS: Project LEAD comprises a unique curriculum for training breast cancer activists in science and critical appraisal. Course evaluations indicate that students gain confidence and skills from the course.