RESUMO
Background: COVID-19 increased the demand for Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) services as a rapid solution for safe patient follow-up in a lockdown context. Time and resource constraints resulted in unplanned scaled-up RPM pilot initiatives posing risks to the access and quality of care. Scalability and rapid implementation of RPM services require social change and active collaboration between stakeholders. Therefore, a participatory action research (PAR) approach is needed to support the collaborative development of the technological component while simultaneously implementing and evaluating the RPM service through critical action-reflection cycles. Objective: This study aims to demonstrate how PAR can be used to guide the scalability design of RPM pilot initiatives and the implementation of RPM-based follow-up services. Methods: Using a case study strategy, we described the PAR team's (nurses, physicians, developers, and researchers) activities within and across the four phases of the research process (problem definition, planning, action, and reflection). Team meetings were analyzed through content analysis and descriptive statistics. The PAR team selected ex-ante pilot initiatives to reflect upon features feedback and participatory level assessment. Pilot initiatives were investigated using semi-structured interviews transcribed and coded into themes following the principles of grounded theory and pilot meetings minutes and reports through content analysis. The PAR team used the MoSCoW prioritization method to define the set of features and descriptive statistics to reflect on the performance of the PAR approach. Results: The approach involved two action-reflection cycles. From the 15 features identified, the team classified 11 as must-haves in the scaled-up version. The participation was similar among researchers (52.9%), developers (47.5%), and physicians (46.7%), who focused on suggesting and planning actions. Nurses with the lowest participation (5.8%) focused on knowledge sharing and generation. The top three meeting outcomes were: improved research and development system (35.0%), socio-technical-economic constraints characterization (25.2%), and understanding of end-user technology utilization (22.0%). Conclusion: The scalability and implementation of RPM services must consider contextual factors, such as individuals' and organizations' interests and needs. The PAR approach supports simultaneously designing, developing, testing, and evaluating the RPM technological features, in a real-world context, with the participation of healthcare professionals, developers, and researchers.
RESUMO
Article published with errors: https://actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10241 On page 405, Table 3, where it reads: On bold, the value 34.4 in "limitação do Desempenho" concerning the column "Seguimento a 6 meses" It should read: On bold, the value of 37,9. On page 406, Figure 4, where it reads: The y-axis of index SF-6D values are designed between 0 and 50. It should read: The y-axis of index SF-6D values between are designed between 0 and 1.
Artigo publicado com erros: https://actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10241 Na página 405, Tabela 3 onde se lê: A negrito o valor 34,4 na dimensão "limitação do Desempenho" referente à coluna "Seguimento a 6 meses"Deverá ler-se: A negrito o valor 37,9. Na página 406, Figura 4, onde se lê:O eixo do índice SF-6D com valores entre 0 a 50.Deverá ler-se:O eixo do índice SF-6D com valores entre 0 a 1.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Aortic valve replacement surgery is done to increase patients' life expectancy and improve their health-related quality of life. Several published studies have found improvement in health-related quality of life after this procedure, but none have involved patients in Portugal. This study sought to evaluate patients' health-related quality of life after the implantation of aortic prostheses and compare these values with preoperative health-related quality of life and the general Portuguese population's health-related quality of life. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was done with elective patients who underwent implantation of an aortic prosthesis between August 2011 and April 2016. Health-related quality of life was evaluated using the Short Form 36 Health Survey and Short Form 6 Health Survey questionnaires in the preoperative period and 3, 6 and 12 months post-surgery. Descriptive and inferential analyses were conducted to process the data and compare preoperative health-related quality of life with postoperative values and the Portuguese population's norms. RESULTS: The sample included 506 patients with an average age of 70.6 years. The majority are male (53.6%). The postoperative results show a statistically significant improvement compared to preoperative health-related quality of life in all eight dimensions of the Short Form 36 Health Survey. When contrasted with the general Portuguese population, patients' health-related quality of life is lower in the preoperative period, improving postoperatively and reaching higher than average health-related quality of life levels in some subgroups of patients and in various dimensions. An analysis of the Short Form 6 Health Survey results revealed that the patients undergoing this surgery have a higher level of preoperative problems compared with the general population, but these patients' values approach those of the general population by the end of one year post-surgery. DISCUSSION: This is the first study in Portugal that compares health-related quality of life using a validated scale, before and after the aortic prosthesis implantation surgery. The results demonstrate a significant improvement in all dimensions, which is not consistently observed in other published studies. CONCLUSION: The results confirm that the implantation of aortic prostheses improves patients' health-related quality of life, over time bringing it close to the general population's levels.
Introdução: O objetivo da cirurgia de substituição valvular aórtica é o aumento da esperança de vida e a melhoria da qualidade de vida relacionada com a saúde. Existem vários estudos que evidenciam melhoria da qualidade de vida relacionada com a saúde nestes doentes, mas não aplicados à população portuguesa. O objetivo deste estudo é avaliar a qualidade de vida relacionada com a saúde pós-implantação de prótese aórtica e comparar com a qualidade de vida relacionada com a saúde pré-operatória e da população em geral. Material e Métodos: Foi feito um estudo retrospetivo de doentes eletivos submetidos a implantação de prótese aórtica entre agosto de 2011 e abril de 2016. A qualidade de vida relacionada com a saúde foi avaliada com o Short Form 36 Health Survey Instrument e com o Short Form 6 Health Survey Instrument no pré-operatório e aos 3, 6 e 12 meses pós-cirurgia. Foram realizadas análises descritivas e inferenciais para analisar globalmente a amostra e para comparar a qualidade de vida relacionada com a saúde pré-operatória com a pós-operatória e com as normas da população portuguesa. Resultados: Foram incluídos 506 doentes, com idade média de 70,6 anos, sendo 53,6% do sexo masculino. Os resultados do pós-operatório evidenciam uma melhoria estatisticamente significativa quando comparados com o pré-operatório nas oito dimensões do Short Form 36 Health Survey Instrument. Comparando com a população Portuguesa em geral, a qualidade de vida relacionada com a saúde dos doentes é inferior no pré-operatório, melhorando no pós-operatório, atingindo níveis de qualidade de vida relacionada com a saúde superiores nalguns subgrupos de doentes e em algumas dimensões. Os resultados do Short Form 6 Health Survey Instrument revelam maior intensidade de problemas no pré-operatório quando comparados com a população em geral, aproximando-se dos valores população em geral ao final de um ano pós-cirurgia. Discussão: Este é o primeiro estudo realizado em Portugal que compara a qualidade de vida relacionada com a saúde, usando uma escala validada, antes e depois da cirurgia de implantação de prótese aórtica. Os resultados demonstram a existência de uma melhoria significativa em todas as dimensões, o que não acontece consistentemente noutros estudos publicados. Conclusão: A implantação de prótese aórtica melhora a qualidade de vida relacionada com a saúde dos doentes, permitindo que esta se aproxime dos resultados da população em geral.
