Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Acta Neurochir (Wien) ; 164(3): 635-641, 2022 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33517465

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Postoperative admission to intensive care unit (ICU) after craniotomy for brain tumor was the routine in the past years. However, there is little evidence supporting this dogma and doubts have been casted by many authors in the last years. Our aim was to identify risk factors for ICU admission after elective brain tumor surgery in order to propose an individualized admission to ICU tailored on patient needs. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including all patients undergoing elective surgery for brain tumor in a neurosurgical post anesthesia care unit of a university hospital over a period of 6 years. In order to identify and validate risk factors for ICU admission, we split the final cohort of patients in a training cohort (two/third of the cohort) and the validation cohort (one/third of the cohort) using a random sequence. Using univariate and multivariate logistic regression, we created a scoring system in the training cohort and tested it with the validation cohort. Moreover, we perform a sensitivity analysis on the overall population. RESULTS: A total of 420 patients were eligible for this study. ASA-PS, tumor volume, and surgery length entered the scoring system. Sensitivity analysis on the overall population for the scoring system had an AUC of 0.774 (95% CI 0.668-0.880, the best threshold at 12.5) CONCLUSIONS: We created a tool based on ASA-PS, length of surgery, and tumor volume to evaluate the risk for ICU admission after supratentorial tumor resection. Prospective studies are deemed necessary to validate our tool.


Assuntos
Anestesia , Neoplasias Encefálicas , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirurgia , Estudos de Coortes , Craniotomia/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Clin Toxicol (Phila) ; 56(1): 69-73, 2018 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28650684

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ingestion of elemental mercury (Hg0) is considered non-toxic. After massive ingestion, local intestinal complications may develop: retention within appendix is quite frequent but treatment is debated. We describe a case of intentional ingestion of Hg0 requiring multi-step decontamination and prophylactic appendectomy. Case detail: A 19-year-old woman was admitted to ED for abdominal pain. History revealed ingestion of large amount of Hg0 as suicide attempt. To prevent absorption, facilitate elimination, and avoid complications a conservative approach was started. Due to inefficacy of initial maneuvers colonoscopy with irrigation/aspiration was performed, repeated whole bowel irrigation was continued and second colonoscopy was performed to clean residual metal. Abdominal plain films confirmed the presence of retained mercury within the appendix in asymptomatic patient. To reduce risk of appendicitis, potential perforation, and possibly systemic toxicity, a prophylactic laparoscopic appendectomy was performed at day 5 with removal of all retained mercury without peritoneal spillage. Highest mercury concentration was 22.7 mcg/L in serum (1-4.5 mcg/L) and 5.1 mcg/L in urine (0.1-5 mcg/L). CONCLUSIONS: After ingestion, metal retention in appendix is quite frequent. Evidence about optimal treatment are different and based on case reports. A multi-step approach with multidisciplinary evaluation tailored to the patient is suggested.


Assuntos
Apendicectomia , Descontaminação , Intoxicação por Mercúrio/terapia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...