Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am Fam Physician ; 98(2): 99-104, 2018 07 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30215989

RESUMO

Delivering serious, bad, or life-altering news to a patient is one of the most difficult tasks physicians encounter. Broadly defined as information that may alter a patient's view of his or her future, bad news may include information related to a chronic disease (e.g., diabetes mellitus), a life-altering illness (e.g., multiple sclerosis), or an injury leading to significant change (e.g., a season-ending knee injury). Patients prefer to receive such news in person, with the physician's full attention, and in clear, easy-to-understand language with adequate time for questions. Most patients prefer to know their diagnosis, but the amount of desired details varies among different cultures and by education level, age, and sex. The physician should respect the patient's unique preferences for receiving bad news. Physicians may experience stress related to providing bad news that extends beyond the actual conversation. For example, physicians are afraid of eliciting an emotional reaction, being blamed for the bad news, and expressing their emotions during the process. Physicians often withhold information or are overly optimistic regarding prognosis, but this can lead to confusion for patients regarding their condition. There are several algorithms available to help guide the physician in the delivery of bad news, including the SPIKES protocol (setting, perception, invitation, knowledge, emotion, and strategy and summary). Skillful delivery of bad news can provide comfort for the patient and family.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Preferência do Paciente , Relações Médico-Paciente , Médicos/psicologia , Comunicação , Empatia , Humanos , Acontecimentos que Mudam a Vida , Satisfação do Paciente , Prognóstico , Revelação da Verdade
2.
J Am Board Fam Med ; 30(6): 832-834, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29180560

RESUMO

The antidiarrheal loperamide has had a recent, drastic increase in off-label use as an alternative treatment for symptoms of opioid withdrawal. The concept of this is easily discovered on the Internet and social media, where there are multiple blogs and forums promoting loperamide use at doses of 70 to 200 mg per day. Unfortunately, the serious side effects are not well recognized. Multiple cases of cardiac dysrhythmias contributing to death have been highlighted in recent literature. In November 2016, the US Food & Drug Administration released a statement highlighting the potential heart effects and risk of death with high doses of loperamide.1 This case regards a 22-year-old who took 200 mg of loperamide per day for 2 years as an alternative to methadone in her attempts to wean off heroin. Her subsequent spontaneous collapse, dysrhythmias, and acute hospital treatment are reviewed in detail as they were contradictory to standard therapy and required a multidisciplinary approach. Her outpatient management addressed the complex biological, psychological, and social aspects of her addiction.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Arritmias Cardíacas/induzido quimicamente , Loperamida/efeitos adversos , Uso Off-Label , Síndrome de Abstinência a Substâncias/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Arritmias Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Eletrocardiografia , Feminino , Humanos , Loperamida/uso terapêutico , Automedicação/efeitos adversos , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...