Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am Surg ; 55(7): 413-6, 1989 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2742224

RESUMO

The efficacy and associated morbidity and mortality of gastrostomy (G) versus nasogastric (NG) tube decompression after gastric surgery were analyzed in a review of 100 patients. Age, sex, and risk factors were homogeneously distributed between the two groups, while perforated ulcers and emergency operations were more common in the G group. A gastrostomy did not completely eliminate the need for NG tube decompression in the G group. Postoperative morbidity was similar in the two groups, with the exception of an increased incidence of atelectasis in the elective NG group and increased mortality in the emergency G group. There was also a significant increase in length and cost of hospitalization in the emergency G group compared with emergency NG patients. Gastrostomy does not appear to offer any significant advantage over nasogastric decompression after gastric surgery and should be limited to special cases.


Assuntos
Gastrostomia , Intubação Gastrointestinal , Estômago/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Avaliação como Assunto , Feminino , Gastrostomia/efeitos adversos , Gastrostomia/economia , Humanos , Intubação Gastrointestinal/efeitos adversos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Úlcera Péptica Perfurada/complicações , Úlcera Péptica Perfurada/cirurgia , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...