A classification system for sinus membrane perforations during augmentation procedures with options for repair.

A classification system for sinus membrane perforations encountered during a sinus augmentation procedure is presented. Five of the perforations are discussed, as are the therapeutic options for their repair. Class I and Class II perforations are most easily repaired, while Class IV is the most difficult to successfully treat. In addition, the effect of the sinus membrane perforation on the course of proposed therapy is discussed. When classified and managed appropriately, sinus membrane perforations are not an absolute indication for aborting the augmentation procedure which is in progress. This paper provides a system of classification that can be used by clinicians to collect data on membrane perforations and repair results.

Controlled subperiosteal tissue expansion to facilitate GBR for the placement of endosseous dental implants.

The success of endosseous dental implants is enhanced when sufficient bone is present to stabilize the implant. If adequate bone for full coverage of the implant is not possible, then the use of guided bone regeneration to regenerate the missing bone has been shown to be a predictable solution. Defect size can often limit the amount of soft tissue available for coverage of the membrane, which is essential in obtaining an optimal result when using regenerative and osseointegrative principles. The treatment philosophy demonstrated in this case report uses controlled subperiosteal tissue expansion to facilitate the incorporation of guided bone regeneration with the subsequent placement of endosseous dental implants. This treatment modality provided a successful treatment for an otherwise compromised case.

Influence of the suprastructure on the peri-implant tissues in beagle dogs.

The purpose of this study was to compare clinical, radiographic and histological differences around titanium oral implants loaded with either acrylic-veneered metal or ceramo-metal fixed prostheses. Five beagle dogs were used in this investigation. At the beginning of the study, all mandibular premolars and first molars were extracted. After 3 months of healing, 2 Brånemark implants were installed on each side of the mandibles. Three months later, abutments were inserted on each implant and a daily oral hygiene regime was initiated. One month after abutment connection, the implants on one side of the mandible were restored with an acrylic-veneered metal fixed prosthesis, whereas, on the other side a ceramo-metal fixed prosthesis was inserted. The prostheses were constructed in occlusion with the maxillary first molars. The following clinical parameters were measured around each implant at this time (i.e., baseline), and thereafter, at monthly intervals up to 5 months: Plaque Index; Gingival Index; implant mobility (using the Periotest); probing depth and clinical attachment level (using the Florida Probe). In addition, standardized radiographs were taken at baseline and 5 months after insertion of the prostheses and evaluated by subtraction radiography. Another Brånemark fixture was installed on each side of the mandibles 3 months before the end of the study. These implants remained unloaded and submerged for the entire study period. Five months after prosthesis insertion, the animals were killed, and implants with their supporting peri-implant tissues were processed for histological evaluation. Analyses of the clinical, radiographic and histometric parameters revealed no significant differences between the acrylic-veneered and ceramometal loaded implants.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Anterior aesthetic considerations for the placement and restoration of nonsubmerged endosseous implants.

Nonsubmerged endosseous dental implants should be considered when planning optimal anterior implant rehabilitation. Detailed diagnostic records are a necessity, along with preoperative and preprosthetic treatment plans that are designed to address the unique challenges of anterior restorations. This paper discusses these concerns and presents two case reports which utilize some of the techniques that can be incorporated into achieving predictable anterior aesthetic rehabilitation using a single-stage implant. The learning objective of this article is to familiarize the reader with those challenges and techniques.

Sinus lift augmentation to facilitate placement of nonsubmerged implants: a clinical and histological report.

The anatomical restrictions for rehabilitation of the atrophic posterior maxilla limit treatment options for many patients. The learning objective of this article is the discussion of these limitations and presentation of a clinical report of the surgical technique and histologic findings of a sinus lift procedure which facilitates the placement of nonsubmerged endosseous oral implants.

Guided bone regeneration at a fenestrated dental implant: histologic assessment of a case report.

Guided tissue regeneration has been shown to establish new attachment in periodontal defects and to facilitate hard tissue repair around dental implants. This case report describes a patient treated with guided tissue regeneration adjacent to an endosseous dental implant. Histologic analysis showed the regenerated tissue to be mature, cortical bone possessing a high level of mineralization.