Current Status of the Workforce and Training at Fetal Therapy Centers in North America.

INTRODUCTION: We sought to characterize the current workforce and training for fetal intervention procedures at fetal centers in North America. METHODS: An anonymous electronic survey was developed to query the 34 centers in the North American Fetal Treatment Network regarding the demographics and training of their faculty. Telephone surveys were conducted with directors of known fetal intervention fellowships. RESULTS: More than 50% of maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) faculty at fetal centers were female; more than two-thirds of pediatric surgical faculty were male. Most of the training of faculty was undertaken by visiting more experienced centers or having new faculty work with more experienced ones at the same center. Current fetal intervention fellowships appear to achieve levels of competency for intrauterine transfusions and laser therapy for twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Two-thirds of centers stated that they would be able to offer a position to an MFM who completed a formal fellowship in fetal intervention. CONCLUSION: A collaborative effort should be undertaken to establish formal fellowships in fetal medicine and intervention.

First 60 fetal in-utero myelomeningocele repairs at Saint Louis Fetal Care Institute in the post-MOMS trial era: hydrocephalus treatment outcomes (endoscopic third ventriculostomy versus ventriculo-peritoneal shunt).

INTRODUCTION: The published results of the Management of Myelomeningocele Study (MOMS) trial in 2011 showed improved outcomes (reduced need for shunting, decreased incidence of Chiari II malformation, and improved scores of mental development and motor function) in the fetal prenatal repair group compared to the postnatal group. Historically, endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) remains as a controversial hydrocephalus treatment option with high failure rates in pediatric patients with a history of myelomeningocele (MMC). We report hydrocephalus treatment outcomes in the fetal in-utero myelomeningocele repair patients who underwent repair at our Saint Louis Fetal Care Institute following the MOMS trial. We looked carefully at ETV outcomes in this patient population and we identified risk factors for failure. METHODS: At our Saint Louis Fetal Care Institute, we followed the maternal and fetal inclusion and exclusion criteria used by the MOMS trial. The records of our first 60 fetal MMC repairs performed at our institute between 2011 and 2017 were examined. We retrospectively reviewed the charts, prenatal fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US) imaging findings, postnatal brain MRI, and Bayley neurodevelopment testing results for infants and children who underwent surgical treatment of symptomatic hydrocephalus (VP shunt versus ETV). Multiple variables possibly related to ETV failure were considered for identifying risk factors for ETV failure. RESULTS: Between May 2011 and March 2017, 60 pregnant female patients underwent the prenatal MMC repair for their fetuses between 20 and 26 weeks' gestational age (GA) utilizing the standard hysterotomy for exposure of the fetus, and microsurgical repair of the MMC defect. All MMC defects underwent successful in-utero repair, with subsequent progression of the pregnancy. At the time of this study, 58 babies have been born, 56 are alive since there were 2 mortalities in the neonatal period due to prematurity. One patient was excluded given lack of consent for research purposes. From the remaining 55 patient included in this study, a total of 30 infants and toddlers underwent treatment of hydrocephalus (ETV and VPS groups). Twenty-five patients underwent ETV (24 primary ETV and 1 after shunt failure). Nineteen patients underwent shunt placements (6 primary/13 after ETV failure). Mean GA at time of MMC repair for the ETV group was 24 + 6/7 weeks (range 22 + 4/7 to 25 + 6/7). Mean follow up for patients who had a successful ETV was 17.25 months (range 4-57 months). Bayley neurodevelopmental testing results were examined pre- and post-ETV. Overall ETV success rate was 11/24 (45.8%) at the time of this study. The total number of patients who underwent shunt placement was 19/55 (34.5%), while shunting rate was 40% in the MOMS trial. Using a simple logistic regression analysis to identify predictors of ETV failure, ETV age ≤6 months and gestational age ≥23 weeks at repair of myelomeningocele were significant predictors for ETV failure while in-utero ventricular stability ≤4 mm and in-utero ventricular size post-repair ≤15.5 mm were significant predictors for ETV success. None of the listed variables independently predicted classification into ETV success versus ETV failure groups when entered into multiple logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: ETV, as an alternative to initial shunting, may continue to show promising results for treating fetal MMC repair patient population who present with symptomatic hydrocephalus during infancy and early childhood. Although our overall CSF diversion rate (ETV and VPS groups) in our fetal MMC group is higher than the MOMS trial, our shunting rate is lower given our higher incidence of patients with successful ETV. To our knowledge, this is the largest reported ETV series in patients who underwent fetal MMC repair. ETV deserves a closer look in the setting of improved hindbrain herniation in fetal in-utero MMC repair patients. In our series, young age (less than 6 months) and late GA at time of fetal MMC repair (after 23 weeks GA) were predictors for ETV failure, while in-utero stability of ventricular size (less than 4 mm) and in-utero ventricular size post-repair ≤15.5 mm were predictors for ETV success. Larger series and potential prospective randomized studies are required for further evaluation of risk factors for ETV failure in the fetal MMC patient population.

Current Selection Criteria and Perioperative Therapy Used for Fetal Myelomeningocele Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the current maternal and fetal selection criteria and operative approaches used at centers performing fetal myelomeningocele surgery. METHODS: The 17 principal investigators participating in the Fetal Myelomeningocele Consortium were asked to participate in an anonymous online survey regarding the current practice of maternal-fetal surgery for neural tube defect repair and results were tabulated. The 35-question survey related to diagnostic testing, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and clinical management. RESULTS: Sixty-five percent (11/17) of principal investigators responded to the survey and not all centers responded to all 35 questions. All centers continue to use magnetic resonance imaging in their preoperative evaluation. Diagnostic testing from amniocentesis is varied: 5 of 11 (45%) require amniotic fluid α-fetoprotein, 4 of 10 (40%) amniotic fluid acetylcholinesterase, and 8 of 11 (73%) DNA microarray. There is also variation from the Management of Myelomeningocele Study with regard to body mass index (BMI) (1/11; 9% would offer surgery with BMIs higher than 35), maternal medical risk factors (surgery would be offered for controlled pregestational diabetes [3/10 (30%)]), hepatitis C with negative viral load (4/11 [36%]), and human immunodeficiency virus with an undetectable viral load (1/10 [10%] or an obstetric history [3/11 (27%)] would offer surgery with a history of preterm delivery on progesterone). Ten of 11 (91%) centers did not consider ventriculomegaly of 18 mm and 9 of 11 (82%) centers did not consider lack of leg movement as an exclusion criteria. Nuances in the perioperative and intraoperative management were also reported, including 5 of 11 (45%) use intraoperative echocardiography and alterations in postoperative tocolytics. CONCLUSION: Variation in practice patterns for offering and performing maternal-fetal surgery for myelomeningocele repair exists among centers. Ongoing evaluation of inclusion and exclusion criteria as well as operative techniques is warranted to ensure continued safety, effectiveness, and beneficence.

International Fetal Cardiac Intervention Registry: A Worldwide Collaborative Description and Preliminary Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Invasive fetal cardiac intervention (FCI) has been reported in single-institution series, promoting technical and physiologic success. OBJECTIVES: This study describes the creation of an international registry of cases presenting for FCI, intended to compile technical and outcome data from a multicenter cohort. METHODS: For this initial analysis, the entire database of the International Fetal Cardiac Intervention Registry (IFCIR) was queried for details of diagnoses, procedures, and outcomes. Maternal-fetal dyads from January 2001 through June 2014 were included. RESULTS: Eighteen institutions submitted data by data harvest. Of 370 cases entered, 245 underwent FCI: 100 aortic valvuloplasties from a previous single-center report (excluded from additional reporting here), an additional 86 aortic and 16 pulmonary valvuloplasties, 37 atrial septal cases, and 6 unclassified cases. FCI did not appear to affect overall survival to hospital discharge. Among live-born infants with a fetal diagnosis of aortic stenosis/evolving hypoplastic left heart syndrome, more than twice as many were discharged with biventricular circulation after successful FCI versus those meeting institutional criteria but without any or successful FCI (42.8% vs. 19.4%, respectively). When fetal deaths were counted as treatment failures, the percentages were similar: biventricular circulation at discharge was 31.3% versus 18.5% for those discharged with univentricular palliation. Survival to discharge for live-born fetuses with atrial restriction was similar to that of those undergoing technically successful versus unsuccessful FCI (63.6% vs. 46.7%, respectively), although criteria for diagnosis were nonuniform. CONCLUSIONS: We describe the contents of the IFCIR and present post-natal data to suggest potential benefit to fetal therapy among pregnancies considered for possible intervention and support proposals for additional work.

International fetal cardiac intervention registry: a worldwide collaborative description and preliminary outcomes

BACKGROUND: Invasive fetal cardiac intervention (FCI) has been reported in single-institution series, promoting technical and physiologic success. OBJECTIVES: This study describes the creation of an international registry of cases presenting for FCI, intended to compile technical and outcome data from a multicenter cohort. METHODS: For this initial analysis, the entire database of the International Fetal Cardiac Intervention Registry (IFCIR) was queried for details of diagnoses, procedures, and outcomes. Maternal-fetal dyads from January 2001 through June 2014 were included.RESULTS:Eighteen institutions submitted data by data harvest. Of 370 cases entered, 245 underwent FCI: 100 aortic valvuloplasties from a previous single-center report (excluded from additional reporting here), an additional 86 aortic and 16 pulmonary valvuloplasties, 37 atrial septal cases, and 6 unclassified cases. FCI did not appear to affect overall survival to hospital discharge. Among live-born infants with a fetal diagnosis of aortic stenosis/evolving hypoplastic left heart syndrome, more than twice as many were discharged with biventricular circulation after successful FCI versus those meeting institutional criteria but without any or successful FCI (42.8% vs. 19.4%, respectively). When fetal deaths were counted as treatment failures, the percentages were similar: biventricular circulation at discharge was 31.3% versus 18.5% for those discharged with univentricular palliation. Survival to discharge for live-born fetuses with atrial restriction was similar to that of those undergoing technically successful versus unsuccessful FCI (63.6% vs. 46.7%, respectively), although criteria for diagnosis were nonuniform. CONCLUSIONS: We describe the contents of the IFCIR and present post-natal data to suggest potential benefit to fetal therapy among pregnancies considered for possible intervention and support proposals for additional work.

CO and NO pulmonary diffusing capacity during pregnancy: Safety and diagnostic potential.

This paper reviews the scientific evidence for the safety of carbon monoxide (CO) and nitric oxide (NO) inhalation to measure pulmonary diffusing capacity (DL(CO) and DL(NO)) in pregnant women and their fetuses. In eight earlier studies, 650 pregnant women had DL(CO) measurements performed at various times during pregnancy, with a minimum of two to four tests per session. Both pregnant subjects that were healthy and those with medical complications were tested. No study reported adverse maternal, fetal, or neonatal outcomes from the CO inhalation in association with measuring DL(CO). Eleven pregnant women, chiefly with pulmonary hypertension, and 1105 pre-term neonates, mostly with respiratory failure, were administered various dosages of NO (5-80ppm for 4 weeks continuously in pregnant women, and 1-20ppm for 15min to 3 weeks for the neonates). NO treatment was found to be an effective therapy for pregnant women with pulmonary hypertension. In neonates with respiratory failure and pulmonary hypertension, NO therapy improved oxygenation and survival and has been associated with only minor, transient adverse effects. In conclusion, maternal carboxyhemoglobin ([Hb(CO)]) levels can safely increase to 5% per testing session when the dose-exposure limit is 0.3% CO inhalation for

Fetal heart rate accelerations and the risk of cerebral lesions and poor neurodevelopmental outcome in very low birthweight neonates.

The risk of intraventricular hemorrhage and periventricular leukomalacia correlates with fetal brain immaturity. Given that the appearance of fetal heart rate (FHR) accelerations is associated with brain maturation, we tested the hypothesis that neonatal cerebral lesions and developmental delay in very low birthweight newborns are associated with absent reactivity of the FHR tracing prior to delivery. We analyzed the FHR tracing of 97 fetuses with birthweight < 1200 g who underwent head ultrasound at day 3 and Bayley Scales of Infant Development testing at age 1 year. We used multivariate analysis to adjust for confounding variables. We found that the absence of two FHR accelerations of 10 beats per minute (bpm) for 10 seconds twice in a 20-minute window 1 hour before delivery was associated with intraventricular hemorrhage and/or periventricular leukomalacia ( P < 0.01) and a significant risk for mental and psychomotor delays by Bayley testing ( P < 0.001). The absence of accelerations of 15 bpm for 15 seconds was not associated with these abnormalities. The absence of FHR accelerations before delivery suggests a greater risk for cerebral injury and developmental delay in the very premature neonate.