The Janus-faced aspect of 'dry weight'.

BACKGROUND: The goal of haemodialysis treatment in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients is to correct the complications of the uraemic condition. Among the main complications are fluid overload and subsequent hypertension that are corrected by achievement of 'dry weight'. We report in this study the evolution of post-dialysis body-weight and blood pressure in patients who began their HD treatment in our unit. METHODS: We studied the monthly evolution of post-dialysis body-weight (expressed as a percentage of pre-dialysis body-weight at the first HD treatment) and predialysis mean arterial pressure (MAP) over 24 months in 61 patients (21 females, mean age 59.8 years; 20% diabetic), treated with cellulosic membranes for 8 h, 3 times a week. RESULTS: The post-dialysis body-weight decreased between the onset of HD and month 2 (M2) (-4.40+/-0.52%). Then it went up, reaching -1.56+/-0.96% at M6, +0.3+/-1.27% at M12, +1.27+/-1.38% at M18 and +1.64+/-1.33% at M24. The post-dialysis body-weight increased by 6% between M2 and M24. The mean arterial pressure (MAP) decreased from 111.3+/-2.5 mmHg at M0 to 94.4+/-1.7 at M6, and then remained stable after M6. Between M2 and M6 the post-dialysis body-weight increased, whereas the predialysis MAP continued to decline. The incidence of hypotension episodes was maximal during the first 4 months of HD treatment. CONCLUSIONS: After the second month of dialysis treatment, the simultaneous increase of post-dialysis body-weight and decrease of pre-dialysis MAP are related to the effects of two processes, i.e. increased weight as the result of anabolism induced by the HD treatment on the one hand and normalization of blood pressure by fluid removal on the other. Continuous clinical assessment of the patient is necessary to provide adequate prescription of post-dialysis body-weight. During the first months of HD treatment, the nephrologist, like Janus, is a double-faced gatekeeper: he must be willing to decrease post-dialysis weight to achieve 'dry weight' and to normalize blood pressure, but he must also be prepared to increase it to compensate for anabolism and to avoid episodes of hypotension.

Interdialysis blood pressure control by long haemodialysis sessions.

High blood pressure (BP) is a major factor contributing to the high incidence of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in haemodialysis (HD) patients. According to predialysis casual BP measurements, long HD has been shown to provide good BP control. To confirm this result during the period between dialysis sessions, we performed ambulatory monitoring of BP in 91 non-selected HD patients (mean age, 58.7 (14.1) years; 14% incidence of nephrosclerosis and diabetes mellitus; treatment duration, 93.0 (77.2) months; 3 x 8 h/week, cuprophane, acetate buffer in 95% of the patients). Only one patient (1.1%) was receiving an antihypertensive medication. Ambulatory BP results were systolic (S) BP, 119.4 (19.9) mmHg; diastolic (D) BP, 70.6 (12.9) mmHg; mean (M) BP, 87.6 (13.9) mmHg. These values were significantly lower than the casual predialysis BP data and close to the reference values reported by Staessen et al. in a meta-analysis including 3476 normotensive subjects. The MBP was inversely correlated with the treatment duration, but not with interdialysis weight gain. The MBP increased significantly in the last part of the interdialysis period, and this rise was not correlated with the interdialysis weight gain. The nocturnal/diurnal ratios for SBP and DBP for the HD patients (0.97 and 0.92) were higher than the reference values reported by Staessen, (0.87 and 0.83), and argued against a nocturnal decrease in BP. We found that 52.1% of the patients had an abnormal nocturnal BP fall (MBP fall < 5%). This feature worsened during the second night of the interdialysis period.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)