A study evaluating noise levels at selected schools in the Czech Republic.

OBJECTIVE: Worldwide, primary schools are the most important segment of childhood education. The main disturbing source of noise in schools is human speech, the primary component of the learning process. School noise has a negative impact on information processing, teachers and pupils, and communication in the classroom. The study aimed at assessing A-weighted sound pressure levels in primary school classrooms. It was concerned with A-weighted sound pressure levels and their fluctuation during various classes. METHODS: The noise was measured with the static calibrated Brüel and Kjær 2260 Investigator sound level meter. The sound pressure levels were measured twice in 12 classes as 11 different subjects were taught to reduce the uncertainty of results due to their potential variability in time. From the instantaneous values, LA (t), equivalent continuous A-weighted sound pressure levels (LAeq,T) and LAmax were calculated. RESULTS: The mean equivalent A-weighted sound pressure level during lessons irrespective of age and subjects taught was 68.0 ± 3.4 dB (uncertainty of measurement). The highest levels of noise were in physical education and arts; the lowest levels were found for English taught as a foreign language. There were no statistically significant differences in LAeq,T depending on the numbers of children in the classes. The main source of noise is pupils. Attention should be paid to negative feelings of noise to reduce LAeq,T in schools. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous noise pollution, in combination with stress and the mentally demanding nature of the teaching profession, may lead to numerous negative effects on human personality.

Hearing Loss in Persons Exposed and not Exposed to Occupational Noise.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare hearing loss in individuals at risk and those not at risk for occupational noise and to compare working loss by gender. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The analysis used data from a current Czech Ministry of Health grant project called Epidemiological and Genetic Study of the Frequency of Hearing Loss (2011 to 2015; NT12246-5/2011). The analyzed sample comprised 4988 participants. Hearing was tested using pure-tone threshold audiometry, tympanometry, and measurement of the stapedius reflex. RESULTS: Females at risk and those not at risk for occupational noise who were younger than 44 years and older than 75 years were found to have no statistically significant differences at any pure-tone threshold audiometry frequency. In females aged 45 to 74 years, statistically significant differences were found. In males, hearing loss was observed as early as 18 years of age. When comparing males and females at no risk for occupational noise, there were no statistically significant differences at any of the frequencies in those younger than 29 years. In females aged 30 years or older, statistically significant differences were observed at various frequencies in all age groups. When comparing males and females at risk for occupational noise, statistically significant differences were more frequent than in employees not exposed to noise. CONCLUSION: Hearing loss in females does not significantly vary depending on occupational exposure. The opposite is true for males. However, the maximum differences in mean levels did not exceed 10 dB. It is therefore clear that noise is a preventable factor, and the use of personal protective equipment is warranted.