Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int Orthop ; 2024 Sep 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39327263

RESUMO

DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Level I academic Trauma Center. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Adult patients with femoral shaft fractures in which a bilateral computed-tomography (CT) scan of both femurs was performed, with a two years minimal follow-up. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: Criteria related to the patient and the fracture were studied. We fixed the following angles, i.e. 10° and 15°, as references for calculating the RM.

2.
Injury ; 55 Suppl 1: 111477, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39069345

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Treatment options for open tibial shaft fractures include external fixation with or without early conversion to internal fixation. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe 1) early conversion to internal fixation and definitive external fixation and 2) in case of conversion, to identify risk factors for complications. METHODS: Seventy-two external fixations of open fractures of the tibial shaft (Gustilo classification, 7 fractures (9.7 %) grade I, 25 fractures (34.7 %) grade II, 40 fractures (55.6 %) grade III (31 grade IIIA and 9 grade IIIB)) were included in a continuous non-randomised study. Thirty-three fractures without infection signs were converted to internal fixation at a mean time of 40.5 +/-15 days (IF group). External fixation was maintened in the remaining 39 fractures (EF group). RESULTS: In the "IF" group, the union rate was 69.7 % at 6.3 +/-3.6 months (3-16). All patients had complete union at 16 months, requiring 2.8 +/-0.8 reoperations. Fixation with external fixation only ("EF" group) showed a union rate of 51.3 % at 8.9 +/-4 (5-22) months and 96 % at 16 months after 3.7 +/-0.9 reoperations. Superficial infection (12.1 %; p = 0.011) and numerous surgeries (2.76; p = 0.004) were found to be risk factors for deep infection. Time to wound closure >7 days (p = 0.049), time to reoperation >28 days (p = 0.00), numerous surgeries (2.76; p = 0.004) and deep infection (6.1 %; p = 0.027) were found to be union failure factors. CONCLUSION: Early conversion of external fixation to internal fixation is an effective option to achieve bone union of open tibial fractures in selected patients.


Assuntos
Fixadores Externos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Fixação de Fratura , Consolidação da Fratura , Fraturas Expostas , Fraturas da Tíbia , Humanos , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Fraturas Expostas/cirurgia , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento , Fixação de Fratura/métodos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Fatores de Tempo , Fatores de Risco , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica , Adulto Jovem
3.
Injury ; 55 Suppl 1: 111476, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39069350

RESUMO

Isolated fractures of the distal fibula mainly affect young, active people. In most cases, fixation is by open reduction with or without casting for six weeks without weight bearing. The current trend is to reduce this period of non-weight-bearing in order to promote earlier functional rehabilitation. The improved mechanical stability resulting from the use of plates with locking screws has changed the postoperative management of many fractures, but there is little evidence for the ankle. Between October 2013 and August 2015, 36 patients were enrolled in a prospective study to evaluate the performance of internal fixation of isolated distal fibular fractures using a lateral anatomically contoured titanium locking plate (InitialA® plate from Newclip Technics, Haute Goulaine, France) with immediate mobilisation and full weight bearing. No patient required further surgery due to mechanical failure or non-union. The bone healing rate was 100 % at 3 months. Two patients had septic complications requiring plate removal and antibiotic treatment and were eventually cured. The use of anatomically contoured locking plates provides strong and stable fixation, allowing immediate full weight-bearing. Such a technique has the advantage of a short recovery time and an early return to work without additional complications.


Assuntos
Placas Ósseas , Fíbula , Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Consolidação da Fratura , Suporte de Carga , Humanos , Suporte de Carga/fisiologia , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/instrumentação , Fíbula/lesões , Fíbula/cirurgia , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Consolidação da Fratura/fisiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Idoso , Parafusos Ósseos , Fraturas Ósseas/cirurgia , Adulto Jovem , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica
4.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res ; 105(3): 529-533, 2019 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30885818

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Autologous bone graft is the gold standard for filling bone defects associated with diaphyseal nonunions. It is typically harvested from the anterior iliac crest (AIC) despite the high complication rate. The Reamer/Irrigator/Aspirator System (RIA) was developed to recover the reaming aspirate and use it as autograft. Initially described for harvesting bone from the femur, the bone volume available is similar to the AIC site; however, its use directly at nonunion sites has been studied very little. HYPOTHESES: Compared to AIC harvesting, RIA at a non-union site will result in (1) sufficient bone volume, (2) similar time to union and union rate, (3) lower morbidity. RESULTS: Two groups of patients received an autograft for aseptic nonunion of the tibia or femur for a bone defect up to 2cm: the RIA group (n=30) was followed prospectively and received an autograft by RIA while the AIC group (n=29) was reviewed retrospectively and received an autograft by AIC. We compared the time to union and union rate, operative time, intake of analgesics, duration of hospital stay and complication rate between groups. The RIA provided sufficient bone, 60cm3 on average in a reliable manner. The union rate was similar between groups: 90% (RIA) and 89.7% (CIA) (p=0.965), while the time to union was shorter in the RIA group (8.63±1.47months vs. 10.08±1.7 months) (p=0.006). The operative time (p<0.0001), analgesic intake (p=0.013), length of stay (p<0.0001) and immediate complication rate (p=0.0195) were higher in the AIC group. DISCUSSION: For the treatment of aseptic long bone nonunion, autograft harvested by the RIA from the nonunion site results in similar union rate and time to union as AIC grafts without additional complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, comparative retrospective study.


Assuntos
Transplante Ósseo/métodos , Fraturas do Fêmur/cirurgia , Consolidação da Fratura , Fraturas não Consolidadas/cirurgia , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Coleta de Tecidos e Órgãos/métodos , Adulto , Transplante Ósseo/efeitos adversos , Diáfises/lesões , Diáfises/cirurgia , Feminino , Fêmur/transplante , Humanos , Ílio/transplante , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Equipamentos Ortopédicos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Irrigação Terapêutica , Tíbia/transplante , Fatores de Tempo , Coleta de Tecidos e Órgãos/efeitos adversos , Coleta de Tecidos e Órgãos/instrumentação , Transplante Autólogo/efeitos adversos , Transplante Autólogo/métodos , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA