P-Wave Morphology From Common Nonpulmonary Vein Trigger Sites Following Pulmonary Vein and Posterior Wall Isolation.

BACKGROUND: Non-pulmonary vein (PV) triggers are increasingly targeted during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. P-wave morphology (PWM) can be useful because point mapping of AF triggers is challenging. The impact of prior ablation on PWM is yet to be determined. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to report PWM before and after left atrial (LA) ablation and construct a P-wave algorithm of common non-PV trigger locations. METHODS: This multicenter, prospective, observational study analyzed the paced PWM of 30 patients with persistent AF undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and posterior wall isolation (PWI). Pace mapping was performed at the SVC, crista terminalis, inferior tricuspid annulus, coronary sinus ostium, left septum, left atrial appendage, Ligament of Marshall, and inferoposterior LA. The PWM was reported before PVI, then blinded comparisons were made post-PVI and post-PVI + PWI. A P-wave algorithm was constructed. RESULTS: A total of 8,352 paced P waves were prospectively recorded. No significant changes in the PWM were seen post-PVI alone in 2,775 of 2,784 (99.7%) and post-PWI in 2,715 of 2,784 (97.5%). Changes in PWM were predominantly at the IPLA (53 P waves) with a positive P-wave in leads V2 to V6 before biphasic post-PWI, LA appendage (9 P waves), coronary sinus ostium (6 P waves), and ligament of Marshall (3 P waves). A PWM algorithm was created before PVI and accurately predicted the location in 93% post-PVI + PWI. CONCLUSIONS: Minimal change was observed in PWM post-PV and PWI aside from the IPLA location. A P-wave algorithm created before and applied after PVI + PWI provided an accuracy of 93%. PWM provides a reliable tool to guide the localization of common non-PV trigger sites even after PV and PWI.

Determining the Optimal Dose of Adenosine for Unmasking Dormant Pulmonary Vein Conduction Following Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Electrophysiological and Hemodynamic Assessment. DORMANT-AF Study.

INTRODUCTION: ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL AND HEMODYNAMIC ASSESSMENT. DORMANT-AF STUDY: The significance of adenosine induced dormant pulmonary vein (PV) conduction in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation remains controversial. The optimal dose of adenosine to determine dormant PV conduction is yet to be systematically explored. METHODS AND RESULTS: ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL AND HEMODYNAMIC ASSESSMENT. DORMANT-AF STUDY: Consecutive patients undergoing index AF ablation received 3 adenosine doses (12, 18, and 24 mg) in a randomized blinded order, immediately after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Electrophysiological (PR prolongation, AV block (AVB) and PV reconnection) and hemodynamic (BP) parameters were measured. A total, 339 doses (113/dose) assessed 191 PVs in 50 patients (66% male, 72% PAF, 52% hypertensive). Dormant PV conduction occurred in 28% of patients (16.5% [32] of PVs). All cases were associated with AVB (AVB: PV reconnection vs. no PV reconnection 100% vs. 83%, P = 0.007). AVB occurred more frequently at 24 mg versus 12 mg (92% vs. 82%, P = 0.019) but not versus 18 mg (91%, P = 0.62). AVB duration progressed between 12 mg (12.0 ± 8.9 seconds), 18 mg (16.1 ± 9.1 seconds, P = 0.001), and 24 mg (19.0 ± 9.3 seconds, P < 0.001) doses. MBP fell further at 24 mg (ΔMBP: 27 ± 12 mmHg) and 18 mg (26 ± 13 mmHg) doses compared to 12 mg (22 ± 10 mmHg vs., P < 0.001). A significant reduction in AVB in patients >110 kg (65% vs. 91% in 70-110 kg group, P < 0.001) in response to adenosine was seen. CONCLUSION: ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL AND HEMODYNAMIC ASSESSMENT. DORMANT-AF STUDY: An adenosine dose producing AVB is required to unmask dormant PV conduction. AVB is significantly reduced in patients >110 kg. Weight and dosing variability may in part explain the conflicting results of studies evaluating the clinical utility of adenosine in PVI.