Donor factors affecting outcome after pancreas transplantation.

In this study, we demonstrated that Px grafts from donors older than 45 years are associated with an increased risk of developing poor glycemic control and premature loss of Px function. Previous studies corroborate our finding that age of the donor is the principal donor characteristic impacting postoperative Px survival. Whereas prior studies also implicated hyperamylasemia as a factor which contributes adversely to outcome, we were unable to demonstrate a significant influence of donor hyperamylasemia on long-term graft survival, although it did correlate with the degree of immediate postoperative pancreatitis and with the need for oral hypoglycemic agents. Similarly, elevated blood glucoses in the donor, which can be a result of many other factors unrelated to the quality of the graft, did not predict a poor outcome in the recipient. NHB donor pancreata did as well as HB pancreata with regards to all postoperative functional parameters. A marginally increased risk of developing major complications was associated with older donors. Despite the frequent use of non-ideal donors, including older and NHB donors, excellent overall Px graft survival can be achieved. Although the quality of the pancreas graft was not directly addressed in this study, we believe irrespective of hyperglycemia or hyperamylasemia, subjective assessment of organ quality by an experienced transplant surgeon is the most important determinant of suitability.

The effect of donor age, recipient age, and HLA match on immunologic graft survival in cadaver renal transplant recipients.

We retrospectively analyzed 526 primary cadaver recipients transplanted at a single center to identify pretransplant variables that predict long-term survival with multivariate analysis. All recipients received at least three random blood transfusions and were treated under a quadruple-therapy protocol consisting of ALG, azathioprine, prednisone, and cyclosporine. Of 526 consecutive transplants, 86 grafts were lost from acute or chronic rejection. Thirteen grafts were lost for nonimmunologic reasons and 35 recipients died with a functioning graft. A total of 273 patients (52%) experienced at least one episode of acute rejection. Donor age ranged from 3 to 64 years, with 62% of donors less than 30 years of age and 9% of donors over 50 years of age. Donor age was not predictive of long-term graft survival and neither was the difference between donor and recipient age. Recipient age was predictive of subsequent immunologic graft less, with younger recipients at greater risk (P = 0.011). The rate of first rejection was also inversely related to recipient age, with younger recipients rejecting earlier (P = 0.0001). The degree of DR mismatch was the only other significant predictor of long-term graft success (P = 0.013). Transplant survival correlated with the degree of DR mismatch: 2 DR mismatch was the worst, 1 DR mismatch was intermediate and 0 DR mismatch was the best (P = 0.02). A, B, AB, and BDR did not influence long-term graft outcome. In our center, donor age does not predict graft failure. Younger recipients have a higher rate of early rejection and, combined with a poor DR match, are at higher risk for long-term graft failure.

Orthotopic liver transplantation in patients 60 years of age and older.

Cyclosporine appears to have abrogated age as a contraindication to kidney transplantation in the elderly, although it is unclear whether this is true for other types of solid organ transplantation. We performed a retrospective analysis of liver transplant recipients who were 60 years of age and older (n = 23) versus recipients of primary transplants who were 18 to 59 years of age (n = 84). Indications in recipients over 60 included alcoholism (6), postnecrotic cirrhosis (6), cancer (4), primary biliary cirrhosis (3), sclerosing cholangitis (2), and one patient with polycystic liver disease. There were no important differences in the initial transplant hospitalization or the incidence of infection and rejection between the two groups. No patient in the over-60 population required retransplantation. Actuarial patient survival is 83% at 2 years for recipients 60 years of age and above compared to 76% patient survival in adult recipients who are under the age of 60. Liver transplant recipients over the age of 60 years have excellent patient and graft survival and the same postoperative morbidity as recipients who are under 60 years of age. Therefore, advanced age does not appear to be a contraindication to orthotopic liver transplantation.

Living-unrelated renal transplantation at the University of Wisconsin.

1. Use of LUrDs under a DST protocol results in a 70% actuarial graft survival at 6 years which is not statistically different from haploidentical or primary cadaver recipients transplanted over the same time period. 2. Sensitization is common, despite the use of Aza, especially in husband-to-wife donor-to-recipient relationship. 3. Rejection occurs frequently, despite the use of DST, however, it is usually reversible. The high rejection rate did not influence the quality of long-term graft survival with very few patients losing grafts to chronic rejection. 4. Expansion of the use of LUrDs could help provide additional organs for transplantation.