The role of radiological subacromial distance measurements in the subacromial impingement syndrome.

Subacromial impingement is one of the most common causes of painful shoulder in the middle aged and elderly population. Since Neer's first description of the process, many investigators have researched this condition in an effort to gain a better understanding of the disease etiology. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the radiological subacromial distance measurements and the subacromial impingement syndrome in a series of patients from our institution. For this purpose, 44 patients scheduled for a unilateral shoulder arthroscopy were investigated prospectively. The acromio-glenoid angle, supraspinatus-glenoid angle (from coronal MR images) and acromial index (from true anterior-posterior shoulder X-ray images) were measured as the implications of the subacromial distance, and the degree of subacromial impingement was graded according to intraoperative findings. Statistical data analysis revealed no significant correlations between the radiological measurements and the severity of subacromial impingement (p > 0.05). On the other hand, there was a significant correlation (p = 0.0049) between the patient age and subacromial impingement. These results suggest that the radiological subacromial distance measurements do not have enough clinical significance as predictive markers in the subacromial impingement syndrome.

Can core biopsy be used instead of surgical biopsy in the diagnosis and prognostic factor analysis of breast carcinoma?

PURPOSE: The aim of this article was to investigate the efficacy of ultrasonography-guided core needle biopsy and prognostic factor analysis of breast cancer to plan overall treatment strategy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A consecutive series of nonpalpable and palpable breast cancers constituted our study group (n= 201 lesions; mean size, 20.4 mm) Mean number of core samples was 3.4. Malignant lesions diagnosed with core biopsy underwent therapeutic surgical excision. Core biopsy and surgical excisions were compared for histologic type, grade, estrogen receptors (ERs), progesterone receptors (PgRs), and c-erbB2 levels. Cutoff values for ER, PgR, and c-erbB2 affecting the management strategy were selected as 10%, 10%, and 50%, respectively. RESULTS: Eighty-five lesions (42.3%) were malignant in core biopsy (mean size, 18.4 mm). Among these, 11 were inoperable and 13 were surgically excised at other institutions. In 61 lesions, core and surgical excision specimens were evaluated in the same institution (mean tumor size, 18.6 mm; range 6-60 mm). Concordance between the 2 biopsy methods was 85.2% (52 of 61) for histologic type of tumor, 68.8% (33 of 48) for tumor grade, 90% (27 of 30) for ER, 86.7% (26 of 30) for PgR, and 79.3% (23 of 29) for c-erbB2 levels. Appropriate site selection for sampling was indicated to be of paramount importance, especially in determining reliable ER, PgR, and c-erbB2 levels. CONCLUSION: Core needle biopsy of breast cancer is equally effective compared with surgical biopsy and can be used in overall treatment planning. However, appropriate site selection for sampling should be guaranteed using ultrasonographic guidance.

The relationship of glenoid and humeral version with supraspinatus tendon tears.

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship of glenohumeral anatomic measurements on MR imaging with supraspinatus tendon tears. The study was approved by the institutional review board and informed consent was obtained from each subject. Forty-two patients (mean age 55.5 years; age range 40-73 years) with supraspinatus tendon tears and 50 asymptomatic shoulders of 32 controls (mean age 43 years; age range 17-69 years) without rotator cuff tears were included. The acromio-glenoid and supraspinatus-glenoid angles were measured on coronal images, the glenoid and humeral head version as well as the bicipital-humeral distance on axial images. Significant differences were found between the patients and controls for both glenoid version and bicipital-humeral distance, which are considered to influence the distribution of forces placed on the cuff (p < 0.05). The patients had a decreased glenoid version by an average of 2.3 degrees (-7.1 +/- 7.8 degrees vs. -4.8 +/- 5.6 degrees), and a decreased bicipital-humeral distance by an average of 2.7 mm (12.1 +/- 3.7 mm vs. 14.8 +/- 4.1 mm). No significant differences were found between these groups for humeral head version and the acromio-glenoid and supraspinatus-glenoid angles, which might contribute to extrinsic impingement by narrowing the supraspinatus tendon outlet. Differences in glenoid and humeral version may be responsible for RC tears by changing the orientation of the rotator cuff and thus increasing shearing stress.