PD-L1 expression can be regarded as prognostic factor for survival of non-small cell lung cancer patients after chemoradiotherapy.

Inoperable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA NSCLC) is treated with concurrent or sequential chemotherapy (ChT) and radiation therapy (RT). Survival rates with this treatment remains poor, reported 5-year survival is about 15%. New treatment strategies, including immunotherapy with programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) check point inhibitors are being investigated. The clinical significance of PD-L1 expression in tumor samples from patients with inoperable LA NSCLC who underwent concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in our institution between 2005 and 2010 was evaluated. The expression of PD-L1 was correlated with clinical and pathological parameters and outcome of treatment. We analysed 107 patients treated with concurrent CRT. Only 43 patients (36 males and 7 females) had sufficient tissue for immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. PD-L1 expression was demonstrated in 7 tumors. No statistical significant differences in patient characteristics, including age, smoking status and gender, were found according to the PD-L1 expression. After a median follow up of 103.6 months, median progression free survival (PFS) was 19.9 months in patients without and 10.1 months in patients with PD-L1 expression (p=0.006). Median overall survival (OS) was 28.4 and 12.1 months for PD-L1 negative and PD-L1 positive patients, respectively (p=0.012).In conclusions, PD-L1 expression was negative prognostic factor for PFS and OS after concurrent CRT in LA NSCLC. As only small number of patients had enough tissue for the IHC testing, no firm conclusions could be made and further investigation is warranted.

Phase I-II trial of low-dose gemcitabine in prolonged infusion and cisplatin for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

After monotherapy with gemcitabine in low dose in long infusion, promising results in a variety of advanced chemoresistant tumors have been reported. In a previous phase I trial on heavily pre-treated patients, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of gemcitabine in a 6 h infusion was 250 mg/m. The objective of our phase I-II trial was to test the combination of gemcitabine in a 6-h infusion and cisplatin in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Eligible patients were chemonaive, had locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC, Eastern Oncology Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2 and normal organ function. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine in a 6-h infusion on days 1 and 8, and cisplatin at 75 mg/m on day 2 of a 3-week cycle. During phase I of the trial, the dose of gemcitabine was escalated from 130 to 170, 210 and 250 mg/m. After establishing dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and MTD of the combination, the trial continued as phase II. Altogether, 61 patients were enrolled, of whom 54 had stage IV disease. In phase I of the trial, groups of six, seven, eight and eight patients were treated at the four dose levels of gemcitabine. In phase II, the remaining 32 patients all received gemcitabine at 250 mg/m. Serious toxicity included a patient with grade 5 ventricular arrhythmia and another with grade 4 cerebrovascular ischemia; four patients had grade 3 anemia. Reversible thrombocytosis with platelets over 500 was recorded in 32 patients; 42 patients had grade 2 alopecia. In general, tolerance to this treatment was good. One patient had complete response and 27 had partial responses, for a 28 of 61 (46%) response rate. Median progression-free survival, median survival and 1-year survival were 6 months, 9.5 months and 40%, respectively. We conclude that this treatment has an acceptable, yet distinct, toxicity profile; routine thromboprophylaxis is recommended. In our population of chemonaive patients, no DLT has been encountered. Due to the remarkable response rate, further research is warranted.