Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Patient Educ Couns ; 55(1): 142-6, 2004 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15477002

RESUMO

Inpatients' satisfaction with hospital care is often assessed by questionnaire. From a psychometrical standpoint, this method has drawbacks, however. We further investigated which item response format would maximise desirable outcomes regarding characteristics of the sample obtained (response rate and representativeness) and psychometric properties of the instrument (e.g. missing items responses, variance, validity) as an initial study into this question was indecisive. Subjects were 1184 discharged inpatients, of which 728 patients (62%) responded. They filled out a 55-item satisfaction questionnaire, addressing 12 aspects of care, using either a 10-point Evaluation scale ranging from "very poor" to "excellent" (E10) or a 5-point Satisfaction scale ranging from "dissatisfied" to "very satisfied" (S5). Both E10 and S5 showed good psychometric properties, but S5 yielded a better score distribution. Other results also favoured S5, but differences were small. In conclusion, different response formats do not yield widely different results. Thus, in choosing between them, convenience could be a decisive factor.


Assuntos
Pacientes Internados/psicologia , Satisfação do Paciente , Inquéritos e Questionários/normas , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Análise de Variância , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Comportamento de Escolha , Análise Fatorial , Feminino , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Psicometria , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Tamanho da Amostra
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...