Limited impact of traumatic brain injury on the post-traumatic inflammatory cellular response.

PURPOSE: Trauma triggers a systemic inflammatory cellular response due to tissue damage, potentially leading to a secondary immune deficiency. Trauma severity is quantified by the Injury Severity Score (ISS). Severe Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) is associated with high ISSs due to high lethality, despite limited tissue damage. Therefore, ISS might overestimate the post-traumatic inflammatory cellular response. This study investigated the effect of TBI on the occurrence of different systemic neutrophil phenotypes as alternative read-out for systemic inflammation. METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted at a level-1 trauma center. Patients aged ≥ 18 years, admitted between 01-03-2021-01-11-2022 and providing a diagnostic blood sample were included. Four groups were created: isolated TBI, isolated non-TBI, multitrauma TBI and multitrauma non-TBI. Primary outcome was occurrence of different neutrophil phenotypes determined by automated flow cytometry. Secondary outcome was infectious complications. RESULTS: In total, 404 patients were included. TBI and non-TBI patients demonstrated similar occurrences of different neutrophil phenotypes. However, isolated TBI patients had higher ISSs than their isolated non-TBI controls who suffered similar post-traumatic inflammatory cellular responses. Regardless of the type of injury, patients exhibiting higher systemic inflammation had a high infection risk. CONCLUSION: When TBI is involved, ISS tends to be higher compared to similar patients in the absence of TBI. However, TBI patients did not demonstrate an increased inflammatory cellular response compared to non-TBI patients. Therefore, TBI does not add much to the inflammatory cellular response in trauma patients. The degree of the inflammatory response was related to the incidence of infectious complications.

Automated, Point-of-Care mobile flow cytometry: Bringing the laboratory to the sample.

Background: Innate effector cells are very responsive to infectious and inflammatory cues found in damaged and inflamed tissues. Their activation is a potential target to assess the state of the immune system. Unfortunately, these cells are very susceptible for ex-vivo activation, hampering accurate interpretation of flow cytometry data. Whether a brief window exists before ex-vivo activation starts to occur is currently unknown. Aims: 1) This study extensively investigated ex-vivo activation of innate effector cells over time. 2) We tested the feasibility of applying a mobile, automated, flow cytometry laboratory for out-of-hospital Point-of-Care analyses to minimize ex-vivo activation bias. Methods: 1) Ex-vivo neutrophil, eosinophil and monocyte activation in a blood collection tube over time and the reactivity to a formyl-peptide was investigated in a healthy cohort. 2) To facilitate fast, out-of-hospital analysis, application of the mobile flow cytometry was tested by placing an automated flow cytometer into a van. The stability of the setup was assessed by repetitively measuring laser alignment and fluorescence verification beads. Findings: 1) Immediately after venipuncture activation marker expression on neutrophils, eosinophils and monocyte subsets started to change in a time-dependent manner. 2) The mobile flow cytometry laboratory travelled over 3000 km, performing measurements at 19 locations with a median single-person-set-up time of 14 min. The laser alignment and fluorescence were stable during all experiments. Conclusions: Accurate flow data of innate immune cells are only obtained when ex-vivo activation is kept to minimum. The use of a mobile, fast, automated, flow cytometry laboratory for out-of-hospital Point-of-Care analyses provides new investigational and diagnostic possibilities outside major hospital flow cytometry laboratories.

Longitudinal assessment of the inflammatory response: The next step in personalized medicine after severe trauma.

Infections in trauma patients are an increasing and substantial cause of morbidity, contributing to a mortality rate of 5-8% after trauma. With increased early survival rates, up to 30-50% of multitrauma patients develop an infectious complication. Trauma leads to a complex inflammatory cascade, in which neutrophils play a key role. Understanding the functions and characteristics of these cells is important for the understanding of their involvement in the development of infectious complications. Recently, analysis of neutrophil phenotype and function as complex biomarkers, has become accessible for point-of-care decision making after trauma. There is an intriguing relation between the neutrophil functional phenotype on admission, and the clinical course (e.g., infectious complications) of trauma patients. Potential neutrophil based cellular diagnostics include subsets based on neutrophil receptor expression, responsiveness of neutrophils to formyl-peptides and FcγRI (CD64) expression representing the infectious state of a patient. It is now possible to recognize patients at risk for infectious complications when presented at the trauma bay. These patients display increased numbers of neutrophil subsets, decreased responsiveness to fMLF and/or increased CD64 expression. The next step is to measure these biomarkers over time in trauma patients at risk for infectious complications, to guide decision making regarding timing and extent of surgery and administration of (preventive) antibiotics.