Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
JACC Case Rep ; 20: 101939, 2023 Aug 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37614329

RESUMO

Patients with inherited hypercoagulopathies such as protein-S deficiency commonly present with venous thrombosis. However, there are rare cases of arterial thrombosis. We describe a rare case of a diffuse left anterior descending and left ventricular thrombus in a young patient with protein-S deficiency complicated with mid cerebral artery occlusion. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

2.
Minerva Cardiol Angiol ; 71(6): 692-701, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37458692

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The potential benefits of the thin-walled 5F Glidesheath Slender sheath in the distal transradial access (dTRA) have not been investigated. This study aimed to compare the Glidesheath Slender versus conventional 5Fr arterial sheaths in patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography (CAG) through the dTRA. METHODS: A total of 352 consecutive patients with an indication for CAG were randomized (1:1) to Glidesheath Slender 5Fr versus a conventional 5Fr arterial sheath for dTRA. The primary endpoint was the rate of successful hemostasis at 30 minutes after sheath removal. Follow-up ultrasound of the right radial and distal radial artery was performed 7-10 days after the procedure. RESULTS: After exclusion of patients where a 6Fr sheath or crossover of access site was required, 108 patients in the Glidesheath Slender and 105 patients in the conventional 5Fr arterial sheath group were included in the analysis. The crossover rate to conventional radial access and the rate of successful hemostasis at 30 minutes after sheath removal were similar between the two groups (18.9% in the Glidesheath slender vs. 22% in the control group; P=0.460, and 62% vs. 51.4%; P=0.118, respectively). The level of pain associated with the procedure was significantly lower in the Glidesheath Slender group (2.69 vs. 3.29 in the control group; P=0.02). No significant difference was recorded between the two groups in the rate of access-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: Use of Glidesheath Slender for dTRA did not increase the rate of early hemostasis compared with conventional arterial sheath.


Assuntos
Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Artéria Radial , Humanos , Angiografia Coronária/métodos , Artéria Radial/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Radial/cirurgia , Coração
3.
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis ; 10(4)2023 Mar 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37103014

RESUMO

Cardiovascular (CV) events in patients with cancer can be caused by concomitant CV risk factors, cancer itself, and anticancer therapy. Since malignancy can dysregulate the hemostatic system, predisposing cancer patients to both thrombosis and hemorrhage, the administration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) to patients with cancer who suffer from acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a clinical challenge to cardiologists. Apart from PCI and ACS, other structural interventions, such as TAVR, PFO-ASD closure, and LAA occlusion, and non-cardiac diseases, such as PAD and CVAs, may require DAPT. The aim of the present review is to review the current literature on the optimal antiplatelet therapy and duration of DAPT for oncologic patients, in order to reduce both the ischemic and bleeding risk in this high-risk population.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...