Relationship between high aortic pulse pressure and extension of coronary atherosclerosis in males.

A high pulse pressure (PP) is a marker of increased artery stiffness and represents a well-established independent predictor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The objective of the research was to determine whether invasively measured central aortic PP was related to the presence and severity of coronary artery disease. In total 1075 consecutive stable male patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography with a preserved left ventricular function were included. Diseased coronary vessel (DCV) was defined by the presence of >50 % stenosis. Men were divided into 3 groups according to the increased value of PP. The average PP in the tertiles was 47.8+/-7.1 vs. 67.0+/-4.9 vs. 91.3+/-12.8 mm Hg (p<0.01). The significant differences of DCV was found among tertiles (1.51+/-1.11 vs 1.80+/-1.04 vs. 1.99+/-0.98 DCV, p<0.01). Aortic PP together with age and hyperlipoproteinemia were found as factors with an independent relationship to DCV according to multivariate linear regression. In conclusions the increased value of aortic PP in the male population is independently connected with more severe atherosclerosis evaluated by the significant number of DCV.

Nuclear receptors gene polymorphisms and risk of restenosis and clinical events following coronary stenting.

INTRODUCTION: Hereditary factors connected with inflammation and fibroproliferation may play important role in restenotic process after coronary stenting. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR) and retinoic X receptors (RXR) regulate the transcription of crucial genes involved in the glucose and lipid metabolism, inflammation and cell differentiation. METHODS: In our angiographic and clinical study we assessed the association of gene polymorphisms of L162V for PPAR-alpha, C161T for PPAR-gamma and A(39526)AA for RXR-alpha with the risk of restenosis and cardiac events after coronary stenting. Primary endpoint was diameter stenosis > or = 50% at follow-up angiography. Secondary endpoints were death, myocardial infarction and/or target lesion revascularisation at 12 months, and clinical restenosis. The results were adjusted for known predictors of restenosis. The genotypes were analysed by polymerase chains reaction (PCR) and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) methods. RESULTS: Control angiography was performed in 477 of 565 patients (84.4%) with following restenosis rates in genotype subgroups: CC 29.0% vs GC/GG 22.6% (p = 0.33) in L162V, CC 29.9% vs TC/TT 24.6% (p = 0.24) in C161T and A/A 26.9% vs A/AA + AA/AA 35.0% (p = 0.14) in A(39526)AA polymorphisms. The T allele ofC161T polymorphism was associated with lower frequency of clinical restenosis (p = 0.015). CONCLUSION: We could not find an association of L162V PPAR-alpha, C161T PPAR-gamma and A(39526)AA RXR-alpha gene polymorphisms with angiographic in-stent restenosis or major cardiac events. However, we found the relationship between C161T PPAR-gamma polymorphism and clinical restenosis deserving further study.

[Factors related to NT-proBNP values in haemodynamically stable patients with normal systolic function of the left ventricle]. / Faktory se vztahem k hodnotám NT-proBNP u hemodynamicky stabilních pacientu s normální systolickou funkcí levé komory.

INTRODUCTION: Increased values ofnatriuretic peptides are considered prognostically significant in normal population with respect to mortality and the incidence of cardiovascular events, regardless of the left ventricular function. The objective of the study is to point out the factors related to NT-proBNP values in patients without the heart failure syndrome and with normal left ventricular systolic function. METHODS: The group consisted of 290 elective patients aged between 50 and 82, with the mean age of 62 years, of whom 47% were women. The enrolled patients were heamodynamically stable, without a history of MI, with a normal left ventricular systolic function and with the serum creatinine level < 150 micromol/l. On the same day, the following procedures were performed: left heart catheterisation, NT-proBNP sampling and echocardiographic examination. Diabetes mellitus, hypertension, coronary heart disease, body mass index, age, sex, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and aortic pulse pressure were chosen as factors with possible impact on the level of NT-proBNP. We used echo parametres to assess the size of the left ventricle, the left ventricular mass index and the presence of left ventricular diastolic function. RESULTS: The median of NT-proBNP was 110 pg/ml (min. 11; max. 1,943 pg/ml), and higher values were recorded for 116 (i.e. 40%) of the total number of patients. Based on the above-referred factors, a significant relation was demonstrated between NT-proBNP and age (p < 0.01), sex (p < .01), BMI (p = 0.03), left ventricular size (p = 0.02), left ventricular mass index (p = 0.01), and aortic pulse pressure (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The study has shown that the level of NT-proBNP in patients does not solely depend on the haemodynamic status and left ventricular function, but is related to many other risk factors of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity.

[Is the left ventricle enddiastolic pressure pathological in the older population?]. / Je zvýsený enddiastolický tlak v levé komore u populace starsího veku patologický?

INTRODUCTION: The percentage of older population has significantly increased in the recent decades. Morphologic and functional changes of the cardiovascular system go together with ageing. The aim of the study should show the correlation between the age and left ventricular enddiastolic pressure (LVDEP) value. METHODS: 106 patients of the age from 23 to 79 years without an organic heart disease and the history of hypertension underwent elective coronary angiography including left ventricle angiography between 1999 and 2002. LVEDP was obtained as an average value from 8 consecutive beats without extrasystoles. According to the relation between increased relative frequency of LVEDP and age patients were divided into two groups: 50 years and older (80 patients) and younger than 50 years (26 patients). RESULTS: An average LVEDP value in older population versus younger population was 12.1 +/- 5.0 mm Hg vs 8.9 +/- 3.4 mm Hg, p < 0.05. Increased LVEDP in yonger population was found in only 11.5 % vs 46.2 % in older group, p < 0.01 and the LVEDP was age dependent, p < 0.05. CONCLUSIONS: In compliance with about mentioned results we suppose that the age is a factor with impact to LVEDP value. LVEDP values > 12 mm Hg in older population may not be pathological and probably are due to the left ventricle diastolic dysfunction in consequence with ageing.

[ST-segment resolution as a simple tool for the assessment of successful primary coronary intervention at a microvascular level]. / Ustup ST elevací jako jednoduchý nástroj pro posouzení úspesnosti primární koronární intervence na mikrovaskuláirní úrovni.

BACKGROUND: The primary success of the coronary artery reperfusion by primary coronary intervention (PCI) is almost angiographically assessed by TIMI flow score. The perfusion at a microvascular level can be inadequate despite the restoring of normal flow in the epicardial coronary artery. One of the options of successful reperfusion at a microvascular level is the measurement of ST-segment resolution (STR) after primary PCI. AIM: The assessment of ST-segment resolution in patients indicated for primary PCI and the comparison with clinical data. METHODS: The authors studied 149 patients (68.5 % men) with ST elevation acute myocardial infarction treated by primary PCI. The ECG was taken at the time of arriving patient at coronary unit and compared with ECG early after primary PCI. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the grade of STR: with complete (> or = 70%), partial (30-69%) and none (< 30%) STR. The lead with maximal changes (STEmax) and sum of ST elevation (STEsum) were assessed. RESULTS: 42 (28.2 %) patients had complete STR, 55 (36.9%) partial STR and 52 (34.9%) patients didn't achieve STR. STR was connected with better left ventricular ejection fraction, which was in group with complete STR 50% compared with 39.4% in group without STR (p < 0.0001). Patients with symptoms of heart failure on admission (Killip II-IV) had complete STR only in 4 cases (10%) compared with patients without heart failure (Killip I), where was complete STR in 38 (34.8%), (p = 0.003). There wasn't noted significant difference in STR at dependence on glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors administration. A normal or mildly slower coronary flow (TIMI 2, 3) was achieved in 146 patients (98%), 3 patients (2%) had inadequate coronary flow after primary PCI (TIMI 0, 1). CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of early ECG changes is simple method for the assessment of primary PCI success at the microvascular level. Our outcomes confirm a differences in achievement of optimal epicardial coronary flow and a perfusion at microvascular level.