The PTW microSilicon diode: Performance in small 6 and 15 MV photon fields and utility of density compensation.

PURPOSE: We have experimentally and computationally characterized the PTW microSilicon 60023-type diode's performance in 6 and 15 MV photon fields ≥5 × 5 mm2 projected to isocenter. We tested the detector on- and off-axis at 5 and 15 cm depths in water, and investigated whether its response could be improved by including within it a thin airgap. METHODS: Experimentally, detector readings were taken in fields generated by a Varian TrueBeam linac and compared with doses-to-water measured using Gafchromic film and ionization chambers. An unmodified 60023-type diode was tested along with detectors modified to include 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0 mm thick airgaps. Computationally, doses absorbed by water and detectors' sensitive volumes were calculated using the EGSnrc/BEAMnrc Monte Carlo radiation transport code. Detector response was characterized using k Q c l i n , 4 cm f c l i n , 4 cm , a factor that corrects for differences in the ratio of dose-to-water to detector reading between small fields and the reference condition, in this study 5 cm deep on-axis in a 4 × 4 cm2 field. RESULTS: The greatest errors in measurements of small field doses made using uncorrected readings from the unmodified 60023-type detector were over-responses of 2.6% ± 0.5% and 5.3% ± 2.0% determined computationally and experimentally, relative to the reading-per-dose in the reference field. Corresponding largest errors for the earlier 60017-type detector were 11.9% ± 0.6% and 11.7% ± 1.4% over-responses. Adding even the thinnest, 0.6 mm, airgap to the 60023-type detector over-corrected it, leading to under-responses of up to 4.8% ± 0.6% and 5.0% ± 1.8% determined computationally and experimentally. Further, Monte Carlo calculations indicate that a detector with a 0.3 mm airgap would read correctly to within 1.3% on-axis. The ratio of doses at 15 and 5 cm depths in water in a 6 MV 4 × 4 cm2 field was measured more accurately using the unmodified 60023-type detector than using the 60017-type detector, and was within 0.3% of the ratio measured using an ion chamber. The 60023-type diode's sensitivity also varied negligibly as dose-rate was reduced from 13 to 4 Gy min-1 by decreasing the linac pulse repetition frequency, whereas the sensitivity of the 60017-type detector fell by 1.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The 60023-type detector performed well in small fields across a wide range of beam energies, field sizes, depths, and off-axis positions. Its response can potentially be further improved by adding a thin, 0.3 mm, airgap.

Density compensated diodes for small field dosimetry: comprehensive testing and implications for design.

PURPOSE: In small megavoltage photon fields, the accuracies of an unmodified PTW 60017-type diode dosimeter and six diodes modified by adding airgaps of thickness 0.6-1.6 mm and diameter 3.6 mm have been comprehensively characterized experimentally and computationally. The optimally thick airgap for density compensation was determined, and detectors were micro-CT imaged to investigate differences between experimentally measured radiation responses and those predicted computationally. METHODS: Detectors were tested on- and off-axis, at 5 and 15 cm depths in 6 and 15 MV fields ≥ 0.5 × 0.5 cm2. Computational studies were carried out using the EGSnrc/BEAMnrc Monte Carlo radiation transport code. Experimentally, radiation was delivered using a Varian TrueBeam linac and doses absorbed by water were measured using Gafchromic EBT3 film and ionization chambers, and compared with diode readings. Detector response was characterized via the [Formula: see text] formalism, choosing a 4 × 4 cm2 reference field. RESULTS: For the unmodified 60017 diode, the maximum error in small field doses obtained from diode readings uncorrected by [Formula: see text] factors was determined as 11.9% computationally at +0.25 mm off-axis and 5 cm depth in a 15 MV 0.5 × 0.5 cm2 field, and 11.7% experimentally at -0.30 mm off-axis and 5 cm depth in the same field. A detector modified to include a 1.6 mm thick airgap performed best, with maximum computationally and experimentally determined errors of 2.2% and 4.1%. The 1.6 mm airgap deepened the modified dosimeter's effective point of measurement by 0.5 mm. For some detectors significant differences existed between responses in small fields determined computationally and experimentally, micro-CT imaging indicating that these differences were due to within-tolerance variations in the thickness of an epoxy resin layer. CONCLUSIONS: The dosimetric performance of a 60017 diode detector was comprehensively improved throughout 6 and 15 MV small photon fields via density compensation. For this approach to work well with good detector-to-detector reproducibility, tolerances on dense component dimensions should be reduced to limit associated variations of response in small fields, or these components should be modified to have more water-like densities.