Slow hematological recovery in children with IBD-associated anemia in cases of "expectant management".

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Allowing children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) to live with subnormal hemoglobin (Hb) levels affects their quality of life. The therapeutic approach to normalize Hb varies according to the cause of IBD-associated anemia. In exclusive iron-deficiency anemia (IDA) repletion of iron stores is obligatory, whereas controlling inflammation is the treatment of choice for anemia of chronic disease (ACD). In daily practice the focus is on control of intestinal inflammation, and spontaneous hematological recovery is awaited. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the hematological effect of "expectant management" on newly diagnosed pediatric patients with IBD with anemia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Medical records of children with IBD were reviewed. Study endpoints were the difference in Hb from the moment of IBD diagnosis (T0) to the end of the induction phase (T1), and time until normalization of Hb, stratified for the type of anemia at T0. RESULTS: A total of 103 children were included in the study, of whom 80 (78%) had anemia at T0. Exclusive IDA was found in 58% of them. Expectant management caused a modest increase in Hb between T0 and T1 for both types of anemia (IDA 0.4 mmol/L; ACD 0.5 mmol/L), but 65 of 80 children (81%) still had anemia at T1. The proportion of children with exclusive IDA had increased to 74%. One third of the cases initially classified as having ACD had progressed to exclusive IDA. There was no significant difference in time until normalization of Hb between children with exclusive IDA and ACD. Twelve months after IBD diagnosis 24% of the group initially diagnosed as having exclusive IDA and 50% of the ACD group were still anemic. CONCLUSIONS: Hematological recovery in children with IBD-associated anemia is slow with expectant management, regardless of the type of anemia at T0. Present results underline the need for a more active approach to improve Hb.

Pediatric Crohn's disease activity at diagnosis, its influence on pediatrician's prescribing behavior, and clinical outcome 5 years later.

BACKGROUND: No studies have been performed in which therapeutic regimens have been compared between mild and moderate-to-severe pediatric Crohn's disease (CD) at diagnosis. The aim was to analyze pediatric CD activity at diagnosis, its influence on pediatrician's prescribing behavior, and clinical outcome 5 years later. METHODS: In a retrospective multicenter study we divided pediatric CD patients at diagnosis into mild or moderate-severe disease. We compared initial therapies, duration of first remission, number of exacerbations, height-for-age and weight-for-height evolvement, and cumulative duration of systemic steroid use in a 5-year follow-up period. RESULTS: Forty-three children were included (25 with mild and 18 with moderate-severe disease). Aminosalicylate monotherapy was more frequently prescribed in the mild group (40% versus 17%; P < 0.01). The median duration of systemic steroid use was 18.3 months in the mild group and 10.4 months in the moderate-severe group (P = 0.09). Duration of first remission was 15.0 months in the mild group and 23.4 months in the moderate-severe group (P = 0.16). The mean number of exacerbations was 2.2 in the mild group and 1.8 in the moderate-severe group (P = 0.28). CONCLUSIONS: CD patients with mild disease were treated with aminosalicylate monotherapy more frequently. These patients, however, tend to have more exacerbations, shorter duration of first remission, and longer total duration of systemic steroid use. Our data support the concept that severity of disease at diagnosis does not reliably predict subsequent clinical course. This study suggests that there is no indication that children with mild CD should be treated differently compared to children with moderate-severe disease.

Cyclosporine A withdrawal during follow-up after pediatric liver transplantation.

It is unclear whether cyclosporine A (CsA) can be withdrawn safely during follow-up after pediatric liver transplantation. In our transplant program we have been using a strict protocol to withdraw CsA. The aim of this study was to retrospectively assess the effects of CsA withdrawal after pediatric liver transplantation on the incidence of rejection and renal function. Between 1986 and 2001, 91 children received CsA for at least 2 yr after liver transplantation. Specific criteria for eligibility to withdraw CsA were set. In 53 of the 91 children CsA was withdrawn. In 35 patients (66%) withdrawal of CsA did not cause rejection. In these patients the renal function improved compared with baseline values (glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at 1 yr, +16 mL/minute/1.73 m3, P < 0.001; at 2 yr, +10 mL/minute/1.73 m3, P < 0.05). After CsA withdrawal, 18 patients developed rejection (34%), which could be effectively treated by methylprednisolone and restarting CsA. Failure to withdraw CsA was not associated with increased incidence of graft loss. A body weight below 10 kg at the time of transplantation correlated significantly with successful withdrawal of CsA (<10 kg, 85% vs. > 10 kg, 60%; P < 0.05). In conclusion CsA can successfully be withdrawn in a major proportion of selected pediatric liver transplantation patients during follow-up. The success rate is the highest in children with a body weight below 10 kg at the time of transplantation. Successful withdrawal improves renal function, whereas failure to withdraw is not associated with graft loss or persisting morbidity.