Addressing Perinatal Opioid Use at a Local Health Department in Florida.

PURPOSE: Perinatal substance use disorders (SUDs) remain an urgent public health concern in the United States and are associated with increased maternal and infant morbidity and mortality. Establishing holistic prenatal care among this population allows for engaging or re-engaging the pregnant population in appropriate medical care, including treatment for SUD. DESCRIPTION: The Florida Department of Health in Citrus County (DOH-Citrus) noticed an increase in SUD among their pregnant population and developed a pilot program that incorporates Medication for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) and mental health services during routine prenatal care appointments. ASSESSMENT: Since the launch of the pilot program, DOH-Citrus has provided prenatal programs with buprenorphine assistance to 23 members of the community. CONCLUSION: A growing number of local health departments (LHDs) provide harm reduction supplies, overdose prevention education, and local resources for treatment and other life-saving services. In many communities, LHDs are typically the most accessible sources of public health information and health care services. By framing the pilot program as a prenatal care center that incorporates SUD treatment as the prescribed standard of care, DOH-Citrus has implemented a holistic model for treating SUD and reducing barriers while improving continuity of care. LHDs are uniquely positioned to implement harm reduction strategies that address perinatal SUDs, treatment, and recovery within maternal and child health populations. As a health department located in a state without expanded Medicaid and with high rates of uninsured people, this pilot program has the potential to be replicated in other states facing similar challenges.

The State of our Breastfeeding Friendly Childcare Programs: Ten Years After the 2011 Surgeon General's Call to Action to Support Breastfeeding.

BACKGROUND: Ten years ago, the U.S. Surgeon General's Call to Action to Support Breastfeeding made recommendations for childcare settings, including: (1) accommodating and supporting breastfeeding families; and (2) adopting national guidelines on breastfeeding support in childcare settings. RESEARCH AIMS: To (1) describe the existing breastfeeding friendly childcare designation programs in the United States; and (2) describe how states are accommodating breastfeeding families in childcare settings. METHOD: The study design was cross-sectional, prospective thematic description of existing publicly available documents. A search of state breastfeeding coalitions was conducted to assess the number of states with breastfeeding friendly childcare designation programs. A definitive yes-or-no answer regarding whether each state had a program was obtained from all 50 states. For states with programs, designation materials were analyzed using thematic analysis and the framework method to compare designation components. RESULTS: Fifteen states had evidence of breastfeeding friendly childcare designation programs and similarities exist across designation program components. Four standards were common to all 15 programs: written policy on breastfeeding, suitable space within the center where mothers can breastfeed or express their milk, educational materials, and resources on breastfeeding available to parents. Most states required self-assessment to achieve designation status. CONCLUSION: Research is needed to enable evidence-based programs and decision-making regarding components and processes. Federal funding should support these programs' mission, including funding research to assess how and in what circumstances these programs are improving breastfeeding-related outcomes and supporting breastfeeding families.

"Breast Is Best, But " According to Childcare Administrators, Not Best for the Childcare Environment.

Background: Nearly 74% of U.S. mothers work full-time and employment is a cited reason for stopping breastfeeding. In the effort to increase breastfeeding duration, childcare providers could facilitate continuation of human milk feeding when mothers return to work. Yet, mothers report receiving little support when transitioning infants into childcare. Objective: Explore the themes of comfort with human milk and formula feeding among childcare administrators near Tampa, Florida. Material and Methods: Twenty-eight childcare administrators participated in semistructured interviews regarding policies and perceptions about infant feeding practices at their center. Using Applied Thematic Analysis, interview themes were identified. Results: Most administrators agreed "breastfeeding is best." However, they expressed discomfort with mothers breastfeeding at the center and perceived risk with handling and feeding human milk. These perceptions are illustrated through the theme "Formula feeding is normative" and four emergent subthemes: "Human milk is potentially harmful," "People are uncomfortable with breastfeeding in public," "I'm not the expert," and "'Breastfeeding is best', in theory." Conclusion: While breastfeeding may be best for health, from the childcare administrators' perspectives, it may not be best for the childcare environment. A cultural shift may be needed to change norms and perceptions in the childcare environment to support mothers in their effort to provide human milk. Perhaps it is time for a new message, such as "We can help you."