Intraocular lens power calculations using corneal topography after photorefractive keratectomy.

PURPOSE: To report two patients (two eyes) with previous photorefractive keratectomy, who subsequently underwent cataract extraction years later. DESIGN: Case reports. METHODS: Corneal topography was used to determine corneal power used in intraocular lens power calculations. RESULTS: In two eyes of two patients, intraocular lens calculations after photorefractive keratectomy were inadequate, which resulted in a hyperopic postoperative refractive error requiring implantation of a piggyback intraocular lens. CONCLUSION: Corneal topography to determine corneal power in patients with previous photorefractive keratectomy may result in unpredictable intraocular lens power calculations. The clinical history method is the standard to determine corneal power and should be considered in intraocular lens calculations before cataract surgery. We recommend supplying refractive patients with preoperative data for use in future formulas for intraocular lens selection.

Astigmatism after corneal thermal injury.

A 42-year-old woman developed significant astigmatism after localized thermal injury to the cornea during a cosmetic eyelid procedure. The induced astigmatism regressed substantially over the ensuing months. One year after the injury, astigmatic keratotomy (AK) was performed, further reducing the astigmatism and improving the patient's subjective vision. Patients with induced astigmatism from thermal corneal injury should be monitored for regression. When refractive stability is achieved, AK can reduce the remaining astigmatism. This case reviews concepts that apply to refractive thermal keratoplasty.

Agreement and repeatability of pupillometry using videokeratography and infrared devices.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy and repeatability of the pupil-measuring modules of several corneal topography devices. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Saint Louis University Eye Institute, St. Louis, Missouri, USA. METHODS: In 14 eyes of 7 healthy myopic patients, pupillometry was performed with 3 corneal topography devices and with an infrared pupillometer under luminance-matched conditions for the Placido projection of the topography devices. Pupils were also measured under a mesopic condition. Outcomes were pupil diameters, limits of agreement, and coefficient of repeatability of the topography devices. RESULTS: Mean pupil diameter measurements with the Technomed C-Scan, Humphrey Masterview, Alcon EyeMap, and under a mesopic condition were 3.35 mm, 2.96 mm, 2.34 mm, and 5.94 mm, respectively. All pupil diameter measurements differed significantly from one another except those by the Masterview and C-Scan devices. The mean difference between the C-Scan and luminance-matched infrared measurements was 0.74 mm and between the Masterview and luminance-matched infrared measurements, 0.27 mm. The limits of agreement +/- 2 standard deviations was 4.12 mm and 1.56 mm for the C-Scan and Masterview devices, respectively. Coefficients of repeatability were 0.56 mm, 0.46 mm, and 0.44 mm for the C-Scan, Masterview, and EyeMap devices, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although topography pupillometry was repeatable, it underestimated the largest natural pupil diameter because of the luminance of the Placido rings. The difference in limits of agreement between the C-Scan and Masterview devices may be explained by pupil physiology and the static nature of videokeratoscopy. These results have implications when topography pupillometry is used to assess pupil diameters prior to refractive surgery. We do not recommend using pupil diameters measured by topography to preoperatively determine halo-related safety.

Improvement of visual function with glare testing after photorefractive keratectomy and radial keratotomy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of a glare source on visual function in patients after photorefractive keratectomy and radial keratotomy. METHODS: Thirteen patients (22 eyes) who underwent photorefractive keratectomy and 20 patients (40 eyes) who underwent radial keratotomy were evaluated in this cross-sectional study. LogMAR visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were measured. Pupils were measured with the Rosenbaum card. A halogen/tungsten glare source approximated the luminance of headlights of an oncoming car at 100 feet. RESULTS: In the photorefractive keratectomy and radial keratotomy groups, pupils were significantly smaller (P<.01) and the pupillary clearance of the ablation zone in photorefractive keratectomy and the clear zone in radial keratotomy were significantly larger under the glare condition (P<.01). In the photorefractive keratectomy group, visual acuity and contrast sensitivity under the glare condition were significantly higher than in the no-glare condition (P = .02). In the radial keratotomy group, contrast sensitivity under the glare condition was significantly higher than under the no-glare condition (P = .001 to .003). CONCLUSIONS: After photorefractive keratectomy or radial keratotomy, the traditional glare source constricted the pupil and partially masked the optical aberrations, which resulted in an improvement in visual function. A "pupil-sparing" aberration test is needed for evaluation of visual function after refractive surgery.

Comparison of contrast sensitivity in different soft contact lenses and spectacles.

PURPOSE: To compare the visual performance of soft contact lenses and spectacles. METHODS: Twenty eyes of ten patients were examined. Each patient was fit with Acuvue, Cibasoft, and Biomedics contact lenses in random order. LogMar visual acuity and contrast sensitivity using the VectorVision CSV-1000 were measured. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in visual acuity between any contact lenses (P=.15). Contrast sensitivity at 12 cycles/degree was significantly lower for the Cibasoft lens compared to spectacles (P=.04). There was no significant difference between spectacles and contact lenses for remaining spatial frequencies (P=.07-.35). CONCLUSIONS: Visual acuity appears to be an insensitive method for evaluating soft contact lenses. The lathe-cut manufacturing process may be responsible for reduced visual function compared to cast-molded lenses. Further study in this area is needed.

Agreement and repeatability of infrared pupillometry and the comparison method.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy and repeatability of the widely used comparison method of measuring pupil size. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Fourteen eyes of seven healthy myopic subjects were examined. INTERVENTION: Two examiners made two repeated measures of pupil diameters of 14 eyes using Rosenbaum card comparison pupillometry and infrared pupillometry. Subjects fixated on a distant visual acuity chart, and pupils were measured under three luminance conditions. The agreement and inter-rater repeatability of both methods were determined. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes were pupil diameters, limits of agreement, and coefficient of repeatability of two examiners. RESULTS: The mean difference between the two techniques ranged from 0.3 to 0.5 mm. The limits of agreement within two standard deviations ranged from 2.4 to 2.8 mm. Coefficient of repeatability ranged from 0.6 to 1.4 mm for infrared pupillometry and 1.0 to 1.2 mm for Rosenbaum pupillometry. Inter-rater repeatability of Rosenbaum pupillometry was consistently pupil diameter biased. Pupil diameters measured with the Rosenbaum method were consistently larger than diameters measured with the infrared technique for both examiners under all luminance conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that although the mean difference in techniques was small, the range of the agreement between the Rosenbaum and the infrared techniques was large. The Rosenbaum method consistently overestimated pupil diameters and was subject to inter-rater repeatability bias. Rosenbaum pupillometry may not be appropriate when accurate pupil measurements are required. The results have implications for many clinical trials in ophthalmology, including those evaluating refractive surgery that use Rosenbaum comparison pupillometry.

Role of clearance and treatment zones in contrast sensitivity: significance in refractive surgery.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship between contrast sensitivity, surgical treatment zone, and clearance (ablation or clear zone-pupil diameter) in photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and radial keratotomy (RK). SETTING: Saint Louis University Eye Institute, St. Louis, Missouri, and Hunkeler Eye Center, Kansas City, Missouri, USA. METHODS: Thirteen patients had PRK and 20, RK. Contrast sensitivity was measured with the Stereo Optical F.A.C.T. (F.A.C.T.) and VectorVision CSV-1000 (VV) charts. Pupils were measured with the Rosenbaum card. RESULTS: In the PRK group, VV contrast sensitivity at 6 and 12 cycles per degree (cpd) correlated with the ablation zone (r2 = 0.18 and 0.22, respectively), while visual acuity and F.A.C.T. contrast sensitivity did not correlate. In the RK group, both VV and F.A.C.T. contrast sensitivity at 6 cpd correlated with clearance (r2 = 0.29 and 0.12, respectively). Pupils were larger with the VV test than with the F.A.C.T. chart because ambient chart luminance was less in the former. CONCLUSION: Contrast sensitivity is likely a more sensitive indicator of visual function than acuity in refractive surgery. The VV system unmasks aberrations from the transition zone of ablated and unablated cornea in PRK. Larger samples are needed to determine the critical ablation clearance of the pupil to avoid loss of visual function.

The missing muscle syndrome in blowout fractures: an indication for urgent surgery.

The purpose to this study was to determine whether early surgical repair is indicated for a severely entrapped inferior rectus muscle following orbital blowout fracture. We report two patients with small blowout fractures, severe entrapment of the inferior rectus muscle, and an absence of the inferior rectus muscle in multiple contiguous coronal computed tomography cuts. At surgery, we released the severely entrapped inferior rectus muscles with resolution of diplopia. We concluded that patients with the "missing muscle syndrome" require urgent surgical intervention and that clinician review of radiologic studies is always prudent.

Difficulties with hydroxyapatite orbital implants in two patients with dysfunctional levator/superior rectus muscle complex.

Hydroxyapatite orbital implants are recognized for their excellent results in anophthalmos. Few complications are reported in the literature. We implanted hydroxyapatite spheres in two patients with acquired anophthalmos and denervated or nonfunctional levator palpebrae superioris and superior rectus muscles. In both patients, the implant rotated anteriorly, obliterating the superior fornix and causing proptosis. Prosthetic fitting was impeded, necessitating surgical revision in both patients. A hydroxyapatite implant may rotate and migrate anteriorly in the presence of a nonfunctional superior rectus muscle, distorting the conjunctival fornices and causing proptosis. This complication calls into question whether muscle-attached orbital implants should be used in patients with significant rectus muscle weakness.