Moderate risk-adapted dose escalation with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer from 70 to 74 Gy. First report on 5-year morbidity and biochemical control from a prospective Austrian-German multicenter phase II trial.

PURPOSE: Evaluation of late side effects and biochemical control (bNED) 5 years after three-dimensional radiotherapy with moderate, risk-adapted dose escalation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 03/1999 to 07/2002, 486 patients have been registered in the prospective Austrian-German multicenter phase II trial (AUGE). 399 (82%) localized prostate cancer patients (T1-3 Nx/N0 M0) were evaluated. The low- and intermediate-risk groups were treated with 70 Gy, the high-risk group with 74 Gy, respectively. Additional hormonal therapy (HT) was recommended for intermediate- and high-risk group patients. Late toxicity (EORTC/RTOG) and bNED (ASTRO and Phoenix) were prospectively assessed. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 65 months. Distribution concerning risk groups (low-, intermediate-, high-risk group) showed 29%, 50% and 21% of patients, respectively. HT was given in 87% of patients. The 5-year actuarial rates of late side effects grade > or = 2 for 70 Gy/74 Gy were 28%/30% (gastrointestinal; p = 0.73) and 19%/34% (urogenital; p = 0,06). The 5-year actuarial bNED rate stratified by risk groups (low-, intermediate-, high-risk group) was 74%, 66% and 50% (ASTRO), and 81%, 80% and 60% (Phoenix), respectively. Within multivariate analysis T-stage and initial prostate specific antigen were significant factors influencing bNED (ASTRO) whereas Gleason Score and duration of HT were not. CONCLUSION: Dose escalation within standard three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) up to a level of 74 Gy did not result in significantly increased gastrointestinal side effects, whereas urogenital side effects showed an increase close to significance. However, the total number of patients with severe toxicity was low. To achieve high tumor control rates with acceptable treatment-related morbidity, local doses of at least 74 Gy should be considered, in particular for intermediate- or high-risk patients applying 3D-CRT.

Clinical impact of MRI assisted dose volume adaptation and dose escalation in brachytherapy of locally advanced cervix cancer.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the clinical impact of MRI based cervix cancer brachytherapy combined with external beam radiochemotherapy applying dose volume adaptation and dose escalation in a consecutive group of patients with locally advanced cervix cancer. METHODS: In the period 1998-2003, 145 patients with cervix cancer stages IB-IVA were treated with definitive radiotherapy +/- cisplatin chemotherapy. Median age was 60 years. In 67 patients, the tumour size was 2-5 cm, in 78 patients it was >5 cm. In 29 cases the standard intracavitary technique was combined with interstitial brachytherapy. Total prescribed dose was 80-85 Gy (total biologically equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions). Since 2001, MRI based treatment planning integrated systematic concepts for High Risk Clinical Target Volume (HR CTV) and organs at risk (OAR), biological modelling, Dose-Volume-Histogram analysis, dose-volume-adaptation (D90, D 2 cm(3)), and dose escalation, if appropriate and feasible. FINDINGS: Dose volume adaptation was performed in 130/145 patients. The mean D90 during the whole period was 86 Gy, with a mean D90 of 81 Gy and 90 Gy during the first and second period, respectively (p<<0.01). Median follow-up was 51 months. Complete remission at 3 months was achieved in 138/145 patients (95%). Actuarial continuous complete remission for true pelvis (CCRtp) was 88% at 3 years. For tumours 2-5 cm, CCRtp was 96% both in 1998-2000 and 2001-2003. For tumours >5 cm it was 71% in 1998-2000 and 90% in 2001-2003 (p=0.05). Progression free survival (PFS) for true pelvis (local control) was 85%, PFS for distant metastases was 80%, both at 3 years. Local control for tumours >5 cm was 64% in 1998-2000 and 82% in 2001-2003 (p=0.09) and 100% and 96%, respectively, for tumours 2-5 cm. PFS for distant metastases remained the same during the two treatment periods with 79% and 80%. Overall survival (OS) was 58%, and cancer-specific survival (CSS) was 68% at 3 years. In the two different periods improvement in OS was from 53% to 64% (p=0.03) and in CSS from 62% to 74% (p=0.13). Improvement occurred only in tumours >5 cm: OS 28% versus 58% (p=0.003); CSS 40% versus 62% (p=0.07). Actuarial late morbidity rate (LENT SOMA, grades 3 and 4) at 3 years was gastrointestinal 4%, urinary 4% and vaginal 5% (stage IIA/IIIA). Gastrointestinal and urinary late morbidity (G3,G4) was 10% in 1998-2000 and 2% in 2001-2003. INTERPRETATION: In locally advanced extensive cervix cancer, local control of > or = 85% can be achieved with low treatment related morbidity (G3/G4), when exploiting the potential of MRI based 3D treatment planning including dose volume adaptation and dose escalation and a combined intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy, if appropriate. A significant impact of this improvement of local control on survival is to be expected. For locally advanced limited disease the MRI based approach will likely result in assuring excellent local control (> or = 95%) and in minimizing treatment related morbidity.

Proctitis after external-beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer classified by Vienna Rectoscopy Score and correlated with EORTC/RTOG score for late rectal toxicity: results of a prospective multicenter study of 166 patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the Vienna Rectoscopy Score (VRS) as a feasible and effective tool for detecting and classifying pathologic changes in the rectal mucosa after radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer, and, also, to correlate its findings with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) score for late rectal toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 486 patients with localized prostate cancer underwent external-beam RT up to 70 or 74 Gy within an Austrian-German prospective multicenter trial. In 166 patients, voluntary rectal sigmoidoscopy was performed before and at 12 and/or 24 months after RT. Pathologic findings such as telangiectasia, congested mucosa, and ulcers were graded (Grades 0-3) and summarized according to the VRS. Late rectal side effects (EORTC/RTOG) were documented and correlated with the corresponding VRS. RESULTS: Before RT, 99% had a VRS score of 0. The median follow-up was 40 months. Overall, a late rectal side effects grade or score 1-3 was detected in 43% by EORTC/RTOG compared with 68% by VRS (p < 0.05). Grades 0, 1, 2, and 3 late rectal side effects were found using EORTC/RTOG in 57%, 11%, 28%, and 3%, respectively; the corresponding percentages were 32%, 22%, 32%, and 14% for a VRS of 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. A significant coherence between the VRS and EORTC/RTOG was found (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The VRS is a feasible and effective tool for describing and classifying pathologic findings in the rectal mucosa after RT within a multicenter trial. The VRS and EORTC/RTOG showed a high coherence. However the VRS was significantly more sensitive.

Long-term results in three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer at moderate dose (66 Gy).

PURPOSE: Biochemical control (bNED), disease-specific survival (DSS), overall survival (OS), and late gastrointestinal (GI) and urogenital (UG) side effects (EORTC/RTOG) of patients with long-term follow-up were evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three-dimensional radiotherapy up to 66 Gy with/without additional hormonal therapy was performed in 154 prostate cancer (T1-3 N0 M0) patients. According to T-stage, pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and grading, patients were divided into a low-, intermediate-, and high-risk group. The 5-, 8-, and 10-year actuarial rates of bNED, DSS and OS and late side effects were calculated. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 80 months. Additional hormonal therapy was given in 57% of patients. Distribution concerning risk groups (low, intermediate, high) showed 15%, 49%, and 36% of patients, respectively. bNED 5-, 8-, and 10-year actuarial rates were 46%, 44%, and 44%. DSS 5-, 8- and 10-year rates amounted to 96%, 90%, and 82%. OS 5-, 8- and 10-year rates were 81%, 64%, and 56%. In uni- and multivariate analysis, only pretreatment PSA (<10 vs. >or=10 ng/ml; p<0.05) and PSA nadir (<0.5 vs. >or=0.5 ng/ml; p<0.0001) affected bNED significantly. Age, risk group, T-stage, grading, and hormonal therapy had no significant influence on bNED, DSS, and OS. Rates of late GI and UG side effects grade>or=2 at 5 years were 17% and 15%. CONCLUSION: Current dose escalation studies with better bNED rates may be able to further increase long-term clinical outcome.

3-D Conformal radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer within an Austrian-German multicenter trial: a prospective study of patients' acceptance of the rectal balloon during treatment.

PURPOSE: Patients with localized prostate cancer are treated with 3D radiotherapy using a rectal balloon catheter for internal immobilization of the prostate, thereby reducing the radiation dose to the dorsal rectal wall. The purpose of the study was to investigate clinical feasibility and the influence of acute rectal side effects and pre-existing hemorrhoids on patients' acceptance of the rectal balloon catheter. METHODS AND MATERIALS: 442 patients who underwent primary radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer were included in this prospective Austrian-German multicenter trial. The total radiation dose was either 70 Gy or 74 Gy. Acute rectal side effects were documented using the EORTC/RTOG grading score (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Radiation Therapy 225 Oncology Group) at weeks 2, 4 and 7 of radiation treatment. Within the same time intervals patients were interviewed about their tolerance of the rectal balloon catheter, evaluating five categories of acceptance (1 = no major complaints, 2 = pain at/during application, 3 = signs of blood at the balloon catheter after application but without any pain, 4 = signs of blood at the balloon catheter after application and pain, 5 = balloon application had to be stopped). Voluntary rectoscopy prior to radiotherapy was performed in 310 patients. RESULTS: 429/442 patients (97 %) were treated with the balloon catheter. No major complaints were reported in 79 % of the patients and no acute rectal side effects were seen in 52 % of the patients. Grade 1 side effects were seen in 31 % patients, Grade 2 in 17 % and Grade 3 in 0.5 %. Balloon use had to be stopped in only 4 % of the patients. There was significant correlation between balloon discomfort and rectal side effects (p < 0.01). The presence of hemorrhoids in 36 % patients prior to irradiation had no influence on balloon tolerance. CONCLUSIONS: The rectal balloon can be used in 3D radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer with a high degree of acceptance by the patients. Use of the balloon is safe within daily clinical treatment. Patients reporting acute rectal side effects experienced significantly more balloon discomfort, but the presence of hemorrhoids was not found to influence acceptance of the balloon.

11C-acetate positron emission tomography imaging and image fusion with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with recurrent prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To assess the clinical value of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) image fusion with 11C-acetate (AC) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging for detection and exact location of clinically occult recurrences. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty prostate cancer patients with elevated/increasing serum prostate-specific antigen levels after radical therapy underwent whole-body AC PET. Uptake was initially interpreted as normal, abnormal, or equivocal. In case of abnormal or equivocal uptake, additional conventional imaging techniques, such as CT, MRI, and bone scans, were performed. To precisely define the anatomic location of abnormal uptake and to improve characterization of equivocal lesions, a software-assisted image fusion (CT-PET, MRI-PET) was performed and evaluated as site-by-site analysis of 51 abnormal (n = 37) or equivocal (n = 14) sites of all 50 patients. In 17 patients, additional histopathologic evaluation was available. RESULTS: In five (10%), 13 (26%), and 32 (64%) of the 50 patients, AC PET studies demonstrated AC uptake judged as normal, equivocal, and abnormal, respectively. Image fusion changed characterization of equivocal lesions as normal in five (10%) of 51 sites and abnormal in nine (18%) of 51 sites. It precisely defined the anatomic location of abnormal uptake in 37 (73%) of 51 sites. AC PET findings did influence patient management in 14 (28%) of 50 patients. CONCLUSION: Retrospective fusion of AC PET and CT/MRI is feasible and seems to be essential for final diagnosis. This is particularly true in patients with AC uptake in the prostate region.

3-D conformal radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer: a subgroup analysis of rectoscopic findings prior to radiotherapy and acute/late rectal side effects.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To identify endoscopic pathological findings prior to radiotherapy and a possible correlation with acute or chronic rectal side effects after three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) for prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 03/99 and 07/02, a total of 298 patients, who consented in a voluntary rectoscopy prior to radiotherapy were included into the analysis. Patients were treated with a total dose of either 70 or 74 Gy. Pathological rectoscopic findings like hemorrhoids, polyps or diverticula were documented. Acute and late rectal side effects were scored using the EORTC/RTOG score. RESULTS: The most frequent pathological endosopic findings were hemorrhoids (35%), polyps (24%) and diverticula (13%). Rectal toxicity was mostly low to moderate. Grade 0/1 cumulative acute and late rectal side effects were 82 and 84%, grade 2 were 18 and 17%, respectively. We could not identify any correlation between preexisting pathological findings and rectal side effects by statistical analysis. CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence that prostate cancer patients presenting with endoscopic verified pathological findings in the rectal mucosa at diagnosis are at an increased risk to develop rectal side effects when treated with 3D-CRT of the prostatic region.

Dose and volume parameters for MRI-based treatment planning in intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer.

PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based treatment planning in intracavitary brachytherapy allows optimization of the dose distribution on a patient-by-patient basis. In addition to traditionally used point dose and volume parameters, dose-volume histogram (DVH) analysis enables further possibilities for prescribing and reporting. This study reports the systematic development of our concept applied in clinical routine. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A group of 22 patients treated with 93 fractions using a tandem-ring applicator and MRI-based individual treatment planning for each application was analyzed in detail. High-risk clinical target volumes and gross tumor volumes were contoured. The dose to bladder, rectum, and sigma was analyzed according to International Commission of Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) Report 38 and DVH parameters (e.g., D(2cc) represents the minimal dose for the most irradiated 2 cm(3)). Total doses, including external beam radiotherapy and the values for each individual brachytherapy fraction, were biologically normalized to conventional 2-Gy fractions (alpha/beta 10 Gy for target, 3 Gy for organs at risk). RESULTS: The total prescribed dose was about 85 Gy(alphabeta10), which was mainly achieved by 45 Gy external beam radiotherapy plus 4 x 7 Gy brachytherapy (total 84 Gy(alphabeta10)). The mean value was 82 Gy(alphabeta10) for the point A dose (left, right) and 84 cm(3) for the volume of the prescribed dose. The average dose to the clinical target volume was 66 Gy(alphabeta10) for the minimum target dose, 87 Gy(alphabeta10) for the dose received by at least 90% of the volume, with a mean volume treated with at least the prescribed dose of 89%. The mean D(2cc) for the bladder was 83 Gy(alphabeta3), the ICRU point dose was 75 Gy(alphabeta3), and the dose at the ICRU point plus 1.5 cm cranially was 100 Gy(alphabeta3). The average dose to the rectum was 64 Gy(alphabeta3) for D(2cc) and at ICRU point 69 Gy(alphabeta3). The sigma D(2cc) was 63 Gy(alphabeta3). CONCLUSION: A standard loading pattern should be used as the starting point for MRI-based optimization. Individual changes of active dwell positions and dwell weights are guided by a concept of DVH constraints for target and organs at risk. In our clinical routine, the dose to point A and dose received by at least 90% of the volume for the clinical target volume are both comparable to the prescribed dose. The DVH constraints for organs at risk allow reproducible treatment plans, helping to detect and avoid severe overdosage.

Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group (I): concepts and terms in 3D image based 3D treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy with emphasis on MRI assessment of GTV and CTV.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Brachytherapy (BT) plays a crucial role in the management of invasive cervix cancer from stage I to IV. Intracavitary techniques are based on afterloading devices, with different types of applicators. CT and/or MRI compatible applicators allow a sectional image based approach with a better assessment of gross tumour volume (GTV) and definition and delineation of target volume (CTV) compared to traditional approaches. Accurate and reproducible delineation of GTV, CTV and PTV, as well as of critical organs has a direct impact on BT treatment planning, especially if it is possible to adapt the pear-shape isodose by optimisation using DVH analysis. When introducing a 3D image based approach for GTV and CTV assessment, there is a need for a common language to describe the concepts and to define the terms which are to be used. METHODS: In 2000, GEC-ESTRO decided to support 3D imaging based 3D treatment planning approach in cervix cancer BT with the creation of a Working Group. The task was to describe basic concepts and terms and to work out a terminology enabling various groups working in this advanced field to use a common language. The recommendations described in this report were proposed based on clinical experience and dosimetric concepts of different institutions (IGR, Leuven, Vienna) and were stepwise validated against the background of different clinical experience. CONCLUSIONS: As GTV and CTV for BT change significantly during treatment, time frame for assessment of GTV and CTV for BT is specified in this report: at time of diagnosis GTV(D), CTV(D) and at time of BT GTV(B), CTV(B). Furthermore, CTV for BT is defined related to risk for recurrence: high risk CTV and intermediate risk CTV. Beside verbal descriptions detailed examples are given, partly in form of schematic drawings.

Bladder and rectum dose defined from MRI based treatment planning for cervix cancer brachytherapy: comparison of dose-volume histograms for organ contours and organ wall, comparison with ICRU rectum and bladder reference point.

PURPOSE: To analyze the correlation between dose-volume histograms based on organ contour and organ wall delineation for bladder and rectum, and to compare the doses to these organs with the absorbed doses at the ICRU bladder and rectum reference points. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Individual MRI based brachytherapy treatment planning was performed in 15 patients as part of a prospective comparative trial. The external contours and the organ walls were delineated for the bladder and rectum in order to compute the corresponding dose-volume histograms. The minimum dose in 2 cm(3), 5 cm(3) and 10 cm(3) volumes receiving the highest dose were referred to as [D2], [D5] and [D10] and compared with the absorbed dose at the ICRU rectum and bladder reference point. RESULTS: The bladder (bext) and rectal (rext) doses derived from external contours and computed for volumes of 2 cm(3) [D2], provided a good estimate for the doses computed for the organ walls (bw and rw) only (mean ratio [D2](bext)/[D2](bw)=1.1+/-0.2 and [D2](rext)/[D2](rw)=1.2+/-0.1, respectively). This correspondence was no longer true when larger volumes were considered (5 and 10 cm(3)). The dose at the ICRU rectum reference point did overestimate the dose computed for 2 cm(3) of the rectum wall (mean ratio: 1.5+/-0.4). In contrast, the dose at the ICRU bladder reference point did-in the case of inappropriate topographic location of the balloon-underestimate the dose computed for 2 cm(3) of the bladder wall (overall mean ratio: 0.9+/-0.4). CONCLUSION: For clinical applications, when volumes smaller than 5 cm(3) are considered, the dose-volume histograms computed from external organ contours for the bladder and rectum can be used instead of dose-volume histograms computed for the organ walls only. External organ contours are indeed easier to obtain. The dose at the ICRU rectum reference point provides a good estimate of the rectal dose computed for volumes smaller than 2 cm(3) [D2] only for a midline position of the rectum. The ICRU bladder reference point provides a good estimate of the dose computed for the bladder wall [D2] only in cases of appropriate balloon position.

Neoadjuvant hormonal treatment and radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Adjuvant hormone treatment with radiotherapy has been demonstrated in two studies (Bolla and RTOG 8531) to be beneficial in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer. However, the vast majority of patients with early prostate cancer can be cured with radiotherapy alone. Subset analysis combining RTOG 8610 and RTOG 8531 has demonstrated a survival benefit only for patients with a biopsy Gleason score < or =6 after short-term neoadjuvant hormonal therapy. The results of ongoing research will further clarify the use of hormone treatment with radiotherapy in patients with low and intermediate risk.

The impact of sectional imaging on dose escalation in endocavitary HDR-brachytherapy of cervical cancer: results of a prospective comparative trial.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this comparative prospective study was to assess the effect of CT and MR based individualisation and adaptation on the dose distribution in the target volume and organs at risk compared to a radiography based procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 15 patients MR scans, in 10 patients additional axial CT-scans with compatible tube-ring applicator in situ were performed and digitally transferred to the PLATO(R) planning system. Considering clinical examination and MR-scan before radiotherapy individual 3-D dose distribution was calculated and adapted based on (1) two orthogonal radiographs; (2) isodoses superimposed on the CT images; and (3) isodoses superimposed on the MR images. Adaptation was strictly limited by the dose level at 2 cm(3) bladder or rectum volume (D(2)) to allow comparison of CT and MR plans. All three individualised dose distributions were superimposed on the MR images and cumulative dose-volume histograms were calculated for comparison. RESULTS: 3-D individualisation based on sectional imaging enabled higher dose to the target volume (isodose enclosing 95% of the CTV=CTV(95)) compared to individualised treatment plans based on orthogonal radiographs by a mean factor of 1.2 (1-1.7). The dose to bladder and/or rectum wall was at the same time not increased beyond the prescribed tolerance level (71% of the prescribed target dose). In a subgroup of 10 patients MRI based treatment plans were superior to CT based treatment plans allowing for a higher dose (138% vs. 124%). CONCLUSION: Sectional imaging based treatment planning, in particular using MR, was superior to radiography allowing for a clinical meaningful dose escalation without increasing the dose to bladder and rectum beyond the tolerance level.

Acute side effects during 3-D-planned conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Differences between patient's self-reported questionnaire and the corresponding doctor's report.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy-induced side effects are often scored retrospectively according to the EORTC/RTOG scores for organs at risk by reviewing the medical records. Some studies could prove an over- or underestimation of side effects as assessed by the medical professionals. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate differences in side effects as described by the doctors and the patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 47 patients with prostate cancer were questioned about their side effects by a radiotherapist and asked to fill in a questionnaire at the start, in the middle and at the end of radiotherapy. The data of this questionnaire and the doctor's report were scored according to the German version of the EORTC/RTOG scores for gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) side effects and subsequently compared. We distinguished between "moderate" disagreement (better/worse by one grade, assessed by the doctor) and "pronounced" disagreement (better/worse by two grades, assessed by the doctor). RESULTS: The number of GI and GU side effects increased during radiotherapy both according to data obtained from the doctor and the patient questionnaire. Comparing doctors' reports with patients' questionnaires, for GI side effects an agreement was found in 22/47 patients, "moderately better" scores by the doctor's report were found in 13/47 patients, and "moderately worse" scores in 9/47 patients on average. "Pronouncedly better and worse" scores were found in 2/47 patients. For GU side effects an agreement was seen in 22/47 patients, "moderately better" scores in 17/47 patients and "moderately worse" scores in 3/47 patients. Regarding GU side effects, only pronouncedly better scores, as assessed by the doctor, were found in a mean of 4/47 patients. If the EORTC/RTOG score is used in its original English version, a difference is found, particularly in the assessment of GU side effects, resulting in an higher amount of agreement concerning GU side effects and a minor amount of "pronounced disagreement". CONCLUSION: In order to evaluate radiation-induced side effects, a patient's self-reported questionnaire should be included in the analysis of morbidity, above all for grade 0, 1, and 2 side effects. The validity of data seems to be questionable, particularly in the assessment of grade 0, 1 and 2 side effects, if only data from the doctors' reports are taken into account. The German version of the EORTC/RTOG score--not including the pretreatment status--leads to different results, particularly in the assessment of grade 0, 1, and 2 urinary side effects, which asks for a revision.

Biochemical response after 3-d conformal radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer to a total dose of 66 gy 4-year results.

BACKGROUND: Since the introduction of 3-D conformal radiotherapy (CRT) doses of /= 70 Gy should be considered. As a consequence of our earlier analysis a prospective multicenter treatment optimization protocol has been initiated in 1999. The protocol includes a risk-adapted dose increase from 70 Gy in low-risk patients to 74 Gy in high-risk patients including short-term androgen ablation.

Interobserver comparison of CT and MRI-based prostate apex definition. Clinical relevance for conformal radiotherapy treatment planning.

BACKGROUND: CT is widely used for conformal radiotherapy treatment planning of prostate carcinoma. Its limitations are especially at the prostatic apex which cannot be separated from the urogenital diaphragm. The aim of this study was to compare the localization of the prostatic apex in CT and axial MRI to the sagittal MRI in an interobserver analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 22 patients with pathologically proven prostatic carcinoma were included in the analysis. In all patients sagittal and axial T2-weighted MRI and conventional CT were performed. The position of the MRI and CT apices were localized independently by three observers in relation to the intertrochanteric line. Additional subjective judgment of the ability to define the apical border of the prostatic gland was performed by a five-scaled score. RESULTS: The apex of the prostate could be discriminated statistically significant (p < 0.001) better in the MRI as compared to CT with best judgement for the sagittal MRI. The interobserver variation for the definition of the prostatic apex was statistically significant (p = 0.009) smaller for the sagittal MRI compared to axial MRI and CT. On the average the apex as determined by sagittal MRI, axial MRI and CT was located 29 mm, 27 mm and 24 mm above the intertrochanteric line. The apex defined by CT would have led to an additional treatment of 6-13 mm in 10/22 patients compared to the sagittal MRI, defined by axial MRI only in five patients. CONCLUSION: Additional MRI provides a superior anatomic information especially in the apical portion of the prostate. It should be recommended for every single patient in the treatment planning process. It helps to avoid an unnecessary irradiation of healthy tissue and could lead to a decrease of anal side effects and radiation-induced impotency due to a reduction of the extent of irradiated penile structures.