Ultrasonic Evaluation of the Heel Fat Pad Under Loading Conditions Using a Polymethylpentene Resin Plate: Part 2. Reliability and Agreement Study.

Previously, we developed an instrument to evaluate the heel fat pad (HFP) two-layer structure, under varying loading conditions, with ultrasonography from the plantar surface through a polymethylpentene resin plate; the measured values were equivalent to those obtained without this plate. The study described here aimed to determine the intra- and inter-examiner reliabilities of the HFP thickness measurements and the agreement between long- and short-axis measured values using this instrument. Two examiners successively recorded the HFPs of 40 healthy adults twice under the no loading and loading conditions on the long- and short-axis scans. The HFPs were classified into two layers, and their thicknesses were measured. Short-term intra- and inter-examiner reliabilities were determined using the intraclass correlation coefficients. Measurements were repeated 1 mo later to determine the long-term intra-examiner reliability. The agreement between the measured long- and short-axis values was investigated by calculating the minimal detectable changes. The determined short- and long-term intra-examiner reliabilities ranged from 0.750 to 0.999 and from 0.765 to 0.952, respectively. Inter-examiner reliability ranged from 0.765 to 0.997. Differences may occur between the values measured at different axes. The measurements using this evaluation instrument were reliable, and it is best to unify the measurement axis for quantitative research.

Ultrasonic Evaluation of the Heel Fat Pad under Weight-Bearing Conditions Using a Polymethylpentene Resin Plate: Part 1.

To evaluate the two-layer structure of the heel fat pad (HFP) from non-weight-bearing to full-weight-bearing conditions, we developed an instrument that assesses these changes from the sole through a polymethylpentene resin plate (PMP) with ultrasonography. For actual use, we investigated the influence on measured values and ultrasonogram appearance by interposing the PMP. Additionally, as the PMP may be bent under weight-bearing conditions, its influence on the measured values was investigated. First, two examiners measured the distances inside the phantom with and without a PMP. Second, ultrasonograms were obtained from 40 healthy adults with and without a PMP, and the thicknesses of the whole layer and the two layers of the HFP were measured using the same ultrasonogram. For each experiment, reproducibility was investigated. Third, the distances inside the phantom were measured and compared through the bent PMP, which models the weight-bearing condition, and the flat PMP. The reproducibility of the measurements was equivalent with and without the PMP interposed. Potential bias in measured values arising from deformation of PMP under weight-bearing conditions was not detected. Overall, the PMP's interposition and the bending of the PMP might not influence the measured values and reproducibility of the measurements.