[On the effect of mutations of the fibroblast growth factor receptors as exemplified by three cases of craniosynostoses]. / Uber die Wirkung von Mutationen der Fibroblastenwachstumsfaktorrezeptoren (FGFR) am Beispiel dreier Fälle mit Kraniosynostosen.

PURPOSE: Craniosynostoses are premature ossifications of cranial sutures. They occur isolated and syndromic. Syndromic craniosynostoses are mainly associated with mutations of the Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptors (FGFR) 1 - 3. This paper gives an overview of the etiology and pathophysiology of isolated and syndromic craniosynostoses and discusses the molecular genetic results in 21 index cases (19 seemingly isolated craniosynostoses, 2 cases with a clinical diagnosis of Crouzon's syndrome). METHOD: Mutation analysis in exons of the FGFR 1 - 3 known to be preferentially affected in craniosynostoses was performed on DNA samples from peripheral blood and bone specimen excised at the time of surgery to correct the craniosynostosis. RESULTS: In a girl with seemingly isolated plagiocephaly we identified a P250L (749C-->T) mutation in FGFR3. Her mother showed minor signs of craniosynostosis when the family was re-evaluated. She was shown to carry the same mutation. In two patients with suspected Crouzon's syndrome 2 different mutations were detected at the same nucleotide (1025G-->A or C) and confirmed the clinical diagnosis. No mutation was found in 18/19 seemingly isolated craniosynostosis cases. CONCLUSION: In contrast to syndromic forms isolated craniosynostoses are rarely associated with mutations in FGFR. The affection of further family members is a strong indication of involvement of FGFR mutations. Because of variable expressivity, parents should be examined carefully in isolated craniosynostoses to identify minor signs.

Evidence of intrafamilial variability of CBFA1/RUNX2 expression in cleidocranial dysplasia--a family study.

AIM: To investigate the phenotypical expression of an identical mutation of the CBFA1/RUNX2 gene within a family with cleidocranial dysplasia. PATIENTS AND METHOD: A five-member family underwent clinical examination. Two members, father and son, showed dissimilar symptoms of cleidocranial dysplasia. The two affected patients were examined for syndrome-typical symptoms, and the genotype was determined by molecular-genetic analysis. RESULTS: In both patients an identical missense mutation (G146R) in exon 2 of the CBFA1/RUNX2 gene was identified. In father and son the dental disturbances were similarly clearly expressed. However, the craniofacial skeleton of the son exhibited fewer dysostotic ossification features than that of the father. In the three clinically healthy family-members no mutation of the CBFA1/RUNX2 gene was found. CONCLUSION: In two patients with cleidocranial dysplasia an identical missense mutation in the CBFA1/RUNX2 gene leading to a divergent craniofacial phenotype was determined. The results indicate marked variability in the phenotypical expression of CBFA1/RUNX2 mutations.