RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Synovial calprotectin is a promising biomarker for diagnosing chronic periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs), but its diagnostic value has not been directly compared to synovial leukocyte count and polymorphonuclear neutrophils. This study aimed to: (1) evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy between these markers in patients undergoing revision arthroplasty for chronic PJI or aseptic reasons; and (2) determine the best rule-out and rule-in test for PJI. METHODS: Synovial fluid samples from patients undergoing revision arthroplasty in hip and knee joints were collected and analyzed. Patients diagnosed with an acute PJI, patients treated with antibiotics 2 weeks prior to revision surgery, and/or patients who had active inflammatory joint disease were excluded. Periprosthetic joint infections were diagnosed based on the presence of a sinus tract and/or positive intraoperative cultures according to the European Bone and Joint Infection Society microbiological criteria. RESULTS: A total of 137 patients were included, of whom 19 (14%) were diagnosed with a PJI. Overall, synovial calprotectin had the highest diagnostic accuracy of all studied markers (area under the curve 96%). Synovial calprotectin, with a cutoff of 50 mg/L, had the highest negative predictive value of 100%. However, PMNs (> 80%) combined with a leukocyte count (> 3,000 cells/µL) showed the highest positive predictive value of an infection (positive predictive value17). CONCLUSIONS: Synovial calprotectin is the most accurate biomarker for ruling out a chronic PJI, while the combination of synovial leukocyte count and PMN is most reliable for ruling in a chronic PJI.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: To diagnose or exclude a chronic prosthetic joint infection (PJI) can be a clinical challenge. Therefore, sensitive and specific biomarkers are needed in the diagnostic work-up. Calprotectin is a protein with antimicrobial properties and is released by activated neutrophils, making it a specific marker for infection. Because of its low costs and ability to obtain a quantitative value as a point of care test, it is an attractive marker to use in clinical practice. In addition, the test is already used in routine care in most hospitals for other indications and therefore easy to implement. METHODS: Between June 2015 and June 2017 we collected synovial fluid of all consecutive patients who underwent revision surgery of a prosthetic joint because of chronic pain with or without prosthetic loosening. Synovial calprotectin was measured using a lateral flow immunoassay. A PJI was defined by the diagnostic criteria described by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients with chronic pain were included. A PJI was diagnosed in 15 of 52 (29%) patients. The median calprotectin in the PJI group was 859 mg/L (interquartile range 86-1707) vs 7 mg/L (interquartile range 3-25) in the control group (P < .001). With a cut-off value of 50 mg/L, synovial calprotectin showed a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 86.7%, 91.7%, 81.3%, and 94.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Synovial calprotectin is a useful and cheap biomarker to use in the diagnostic work-up of patients with chronic pain, especially to exclude a PJI prior to revision surgery.
